Participation through letters to the editor: Circulation, considerations, and genres in the letters institution

Journalism

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 21-35

  Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Editorial considerations; Letters to the editor; Media criticism; Participation; Public; Public debate; Public sphere

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951049865     PISSN: 14648849     EISSN: 17413001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1464884909350641     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. AKF (2004) Danskernes Kultur- og Fritidsaktiviteter [The Danes' cultural and leisure activities - with trends back to 1964], published by the Minister of Culture in corporation with AKF, available at: http://www.kum.dk/sw24183.asp
2. Andersen, J. G. (2004) Et Ganske Levende Demokrati [A rather lively democracy]. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag
3. Cook, T. (1998) Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
4. Eliasoph, N. (1998) Avoiding Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
5. Farrell, A. (1998) Yours in Sisterhood. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
6. Gans, H. J. (1979) Deciding What's News. New York: Vintage Books
7. Grey, D. L. and T. Brown (1970) 'Letters to the Editor: Hazy Reflections of Public Opinion', Journalism Quarterly 47: 450-6
8. Hallin, D. C. (1986) The Uncensored War. Berkeley: California University Press
9. Hallin, D. C. and P. Mancini (2004) Comparing Media Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10. Kontrabande and CFJE (2006) Dagspressens Kilder [Sources in daily newpapers], available at: http://www.cfje.dk/cfje/Kildebase.nsf/ID/KB01135495/ $file/dagspressens%20kilder-low.pdf?OpenElement
11. Lippmann, W. (1997[1922]) Public Opinion. New York: Free Press
12. Lund, A. B. and M. Horst (1998) Den Offentlige Debat. Mål, Middel, eller Mantra? [The public debate. End, mean, or mantra?]. København: Spektrum
13. March, J. G. and J. P. Olsen (1984) 'The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life', American Political Science Review 78(3): 734-49
14. Mills, C. W. (1956) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press
15. Nord, D. P. (1995) 'Reading the Newspaper: Strategies and Politics of Reader Response, Chicago, 1912-1917', Journal of Communication 45(3): 66-94
16. Politiken Analyse (2006) 'Internal Reader Survey', March 2006
17. Rancière, J. (1999) Disagreement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
18. Sigelman, L. and B. J. Walkosz (1992) 'Letters to the Editor as a Public Opinion Thermometer: The Martin Luther King Holiday Vote in Arizona', Social Science Quarterly 73(4): 938-46
19. TNS Gallup, Index Danmark, available at: http://www.gallup.dk/ nyhedscenter/statistik/laesertal.aspx
20. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2001) 'Letters to the Editor as a Forum for Public Deliberation: Modes of Publicity and Democratic Debate', Critical Studies in Media Communication 18(3): 303-20
21. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2002a) 'The Normative-economic Justification for Public Discourse: Letters to the Editor as a "Wide-open" Forum', Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79(1): 121-33
22. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2002b) 'Understanding the Conditions for Public Discourse: Four Rules for Selecting Letters to the Editor', Journalism Studies 3(1): 69-81
23. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2007) Journalists and the Public. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
24. Warner, M. (2002) Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books