Genetic analysis of cell wall traits relevant to cellulosic ethanol production in maize (Zea mays L.)

Crop Science

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 842-852

  Lorenz, A J ^a   Coors, J G ^a   Hansey, C N ^a   Kaeppler, S M ^a   de Leon, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77951048731     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0168     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Argillier, O., Y. Barriere, and Y. Hebert. 1995. Genetic variation and selection criterion for digestibility traits of forage maize. Euphytica 82:175-184.
2. Argillier, O., V. Mechin, and Y. Barriere. 2000. Inbred line evaluation and breeding for digestibility-related traits in forage maize. Crop Sci. 40:1596-1600.
3. Austin, D.F., M. Lee, and L.R. Veldboom. 2001. Genetic mapping in maize with hybrid progeny across testers and generations: Plant height and flowering. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:163-176.
4. Balint-Kurti, P.J., J.C. Zwonitzer, R.J. Wisser, M.L. Carson, M.A. Oropeza-Rosas, J.B. Holland, and S.J. Szalma. 2007. Precise mapping of quantitative trait loci for resistance to southern leaf blight, caused by Cochliobolus heterostrophus race O, and flowering time using advanced intercross maize lines. Genetics 176:645-657.
5. Barriere, Y., J. Thomas, and D. Denoue. 2008. QTL mapping for lignin content, lignin monomeric composition, p-hydroxycinnamate content, and cell wall digestibility in the maize recombinant inbred line progeny F838 x F286. Plant Sci. 175:585-595.
6. Beavis, W.D. 1994. The power and deceit of QTL experiments. p. 250-266 In D. Wilkinson (ed.) Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf., 49th, Chicago, IL. 7-8 Dec. 1994. Am. Seed Trade Assoc., Washington, DC.
7. Bertoia, L., C. Lopez, and R. Burak. 2006. Biplot analysis of forage combining ability in maize landraces. Crop Sci. 46:1346-1353.
8. Cardinal, A.J., M. Lee, and K.J. Moore. 2003. Genetic mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci affecting fiber and lignin content in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106:866-874.
9. Carpita, N., and M. McCann. 2000. The cell wall. p. 52-108. In B. Buchanan, W. Gruissem, and R. Jones (ed.) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. Am. Soc. Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD.
10. Carpita, N., M. Tierney, and M. Campbell. 2001. Molecular biology of the plant cell wall: Searching for the genes that define structure, architecture and dynamics. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:1-5.
11. Coors, J.G., K.A. Albrecht, and E.J. Bures. 1997. Ear-fill effects on yield and quality of silage corn. Crop Sci. 37:243-247.
12. Fontaine, A.S., M. Briand, and Y. Barriere. 2003. Genetic variation and QTL mapping of para-coumaric and ferulic acid contents in maize stover at silage harvest. Maydica 48:75-82.
13. Frey, T.J., J.G. Coors, R.D. Shaver, J.G. Lauer, D.T. Eilert, and P.J. Flannery. 2004. Selection for silage quality in the Wisconsin quality synthetic and related maize populations. Crop Sci. 44:1200-1208.
14. Hames, B.R., S.R. Thomas, A.D. Sluiter, C.J. Roth, and D.W. Templeton. 2003. Rapid biomass analysis: New tools for compositional analysis of corn stover feedstocks and process intermediates from ethanol production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 105:5-16.
15. Hazen, S.P., R.M. Hawley, G.L. Davis, B. Henrissat, and J.D. Walton. 2003. Quantitative trait loci and comparative genomics of cereal cell wall composition. Plant Physiol. 132:263-271.
16. Holland, J.B. 2006. Estimating genotypic correlations and their standard errors using multivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation with SAS Proc MIXED. Crop Sci. 46:642-654.
17. Infrasoft International. 1995. NIRS2 version 3.11. Routine operation and calibration software development for near-infrared instruments. Infrasoft Int., State College, PA.
18. Jung, H.G., and M.D. Casler. 2006. Maize stem tissues: Cell wall concentration and composition during development. Crop Sci. 46:1793-1800.
19. Krakowsky, M.D., M. Lee, and J.G. Coors. 2005. Quantitative trait loci for cell-wall components in recombinant inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.) I: Stalk tissue. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111:337-346.
20. Krakowsky, M.D., M. Lee, and J.G. Coors. 2006. Quantitative trait loci for cell wall components in recombinant inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.) II: Leaf sheath tissue. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112:717-726.
21. Lee, M., N. Sharopova, W.D. Beavis, D. Grant, M. Katt, D. Blair, and A. Hallauer. 2002. Expanding the genetic map of maize with the intermated B73 x Mo17 (IBM) population. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:453-461.
22. Lorenz, A.J., R.P. Anex, A. Isci, J.G. Coors, N. de Leon, and P.J. Weimer. 2009a. Forage quality and composition measurements as predictors of ethanol yield from maize stover. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2:5.
23. Lorenz, A.J., J.G. Coors, N. de Leon, E.J. Wolfrum, B.R. Hames, A.D. Sluiter, and P.J. Weimer. 2009b. Characterization, variation, and combining ability of maize traits relevant to cellulosic ethanol production. Crop Sci. 49:85-98.
24. Lundvall, J.P., D.R. Buxton, A.R. Hallauer, and J.R. George. 1994. Forage quality variation among maize inbreds: In vitro digestibility and cell-wall components. Crop Sci. 34:1672-1678.
25. Lynd, L.R., W.H. van Zyl, J.E. McBride, and M. Laser. 2005. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: An update. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16:577-583.
26. Mechin, V., O. Argillier, Y. Hebert, E. Guingo, L. Moreau, A. Charcosset, and Y. Barriere. 2001. Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of cell wall digestibility and lignification in silage maize. Crop Sci. 41:690-697.
27. Mihaljevic, R., C.C. Schon, H.F. Utz, and A.E. Melchinger. 2005. Correlations and QTL correspondence between line per se and testcross performance for agronomic traits in four populations of European maize. Crop Sci. 45:114-122.
28. Mikel, M.A., and J.W. Dudley. 2006. Evolution of North American dent corn from public to proprietary germplasm. Crop Sci. 46:1193-1205.
29. Mosier, N., C. Wyman, B. Dale, R. Elander, Y.Y. Lee, M. Holtzapple, and M. Ladisch. 2005. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 96:673-686.
30. Murray, S.C., W.L. Rooney, S.E. Mitchell, A. Sharma, P.E. Klein, J.E. Mullet, and S. Kresovich. 2008. Genetic improvement of Sorghum as a biofuel feedstock: II. QTL for stem and leaf structural carbohydrates. Crop Sci. 48:2180-2193.
31. Olofsson, K., M. Bertilsson, and G. Liden. 2008. A short review on SSF-An interesting process option for ethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Biotechnol. Biofuels 1:7.
32. Ostrander, B.M., and J.G. Coors. 1997. Relationship between plant composition and European corn borer resistance in three maize populations. Crop Sci. 37:1741-1745.
33. Perlack, R.D., L.L. Wright, A.F. Turhollow, R.L. Graham, B.J. Stokes, and D.C. Erbach. 2005. Biomass as a feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: The technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. ORNL/TM-2005/66. Available at http://feedstockreview.ornl.gov/pdf/billion_ton_vision.pdf (verified 1 Feb. 2010). Oak Ridge Natl. Lab., Oak Ridge, TN.
34. Roth, L.S., G.C. Marten, W.A. Compton, and D.D. Stuthman. 1970. Genetic variation of quality traits in maize (Zea mays L.) forage. Crop Sci. 10:365-367.
35. Roussel, V., C. Gibelin, A.S. Fontaine, and Y. Barriere. 2002. Genetic analysis in recombinant inbred lines of early dent forage maize II: QTL mapping for cell wall constituents and cell wall digestibility from per se value and top cross experiments. Maydica 47:9-20.
36. Seitz, G., H.H. Geiger, G.A. Schmidt, and A.E. Melchinger. 1992. Genotypic correlations in forage maize. II: Relationship between inbred line and testcross performance. Maydica 37:101-105.
37. Shenk, J.S., and M.O. Westerhaus. 1991. Population definition, sample selection, and calibration procedures for near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Crop Sci. 31:469-474.
38. Shenk, J.S., J.J. Workman, and M.O. Westerhaus. 2001. Application of NIR spectroscopy to agricultural products. p. 419-474. In D.A. Burns and E.W. Ciurczak (ed.) Handbook of near-infrared analysis. 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, New York.
39. Theander, O., P. Aman, E. Westerlund, R. Andersson, and D. Petersson. 1995. Total dietary fiber determined as neutral sugar residues, uronic acid residues, and Klason lignin (the Uppsala method): Collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 78:1030-1044.
40. Wang, S., C.J. Basten, and Z.B. Zeng. 2007. Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Available at http://statgen.ncsu.edu/qtlcart/WQTLCart.htm (verified 1 Feb. 2010). Dep. of Statistics, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.
41. Wolf, D.P., J.G. Coors, K.A. Albrecht, D.J. Undersander, and P.R. Carter. 1993. Forage quality of maize genotypes selected for extreme fiber concentrations. Crop Sci. 33:1353-1359.
42. Wolfrum, E.J., and A.D. Sluiter. 2009. Improved multivariate calibration models for corn stover feedstock and dilute-acid pretreated corn stover. Cellulose 16:567-576.
43. Wyman, C.E. 2007. What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol. 25:153-157.
44. Yu, J., J.B. Holland, M.D. McMullen, and E.S. Buckler. 2008. Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 178:539-551.