Multiplicative mixed models for genetic gain assessment in lupin breeding

Crop Science

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 880-891

  Stefanova, Katia T ^a   Buirchell, Bevan ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951046583     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2009.07.0402     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Becker, H.C., and Léon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 101:1-23.
2. Cooper, M., and D.E. Byth. 1996. Understanding plant adaptation to achieve systematic applied crop improvement-A fundamental challenge. p. 5-23. In M. Cooper and G.L. Hammer (ed.) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB Int., Wallingford, UK.
3. Cowling, W.A. 1999. Pedigrees and characteristics of narrowleafed lupin cultivars released in Australia from 1967 to 1998. Bull. 4365. Dep. of Agric., WA, Australia.
4. Crossa, J., J. Burgueño, P.L. Cornelius, G. McLaren, R. Trethowan, and A. Krishnamahari. 2006. Modeling genotype × environment interaction using additive genetic covariances of relatives for predicting breeding values of wheat genotypes. Crop Sci. 46:1722-1733.
5. Crossa, J., and P.L. Cornelius. 2002. Linear-bilinear models for the analysis of genotype-environment interaction. p. 305-322. In M.S. Kang (ed.) Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CAB Int., Oxford, UK.
6. Cullis, B.R., B.J. Gogel, A.P. Verbyla, and R. Thompson. 1998. Spatial analysis of multi-environment early generation trials. Biometrics 54:1-18.
7. Finlay, K.W., and G.N. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14:742-754.
8. Frensham, A.B., B.R. Cullis, and A.P. Verbyla. 1997. Genotype by environment variance heterogeneity in a two-stage analysis. Biometrics 53:1373-1383.
9. Gabriel, K.R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58:453-467.
10. Gauch, H.G., Jr. 1988. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44:705-715.
11. Gauch, H.G., Jr. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI Analysis of factorial design. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
12. Gauch, H.G., Jr. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci. 46:1488-1500.
13. Gauch, H.G., Jr., H.-P. Piepho, and P. Annicchiarico. 2008. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Further considerations. Crop Sci. 48:866-889.
14. Gilmour, A.R., B.R. Cullis, and A.P. Verbyla. 1997. Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2:269-273.
15. Gilmour, A.R., B.J. Gogel, B.R. Cullis, S.J. Welham, and R. Thompson. 2007. ASReml User guide. Release 2.0. VSN Int. Ltd, UK.
16. Gilmour, A.R., R. Thompson, and B.R. Cullis. 1995. AI, an efficient algorithm for REML estimation in linear mixed models. Biometrics 51:1440-1450.
17. Gogel, B.J., B.R. Cullis, and A.P. Verbyla. 1995. REML estimation of multiplicative effects in multi-environment variety trials. Biometrics 51:744-749.
18. Kang, M.S. 2002. Genotype-environment interaction: Progress and prospects. p. 221-243. In M.S. Kang (ed.) Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CAB Int., Oxford, UK.
19. Kelly, A.M., A.B. Smith, J.A. Eccleston, and B.R. Cullis. 2007. The accuracy of varietal selection using factor analytic models for multi-environment plant breeding trials. Crop Sci. 47:1063-1070.
20. Kempton, R.A. 1984. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 103:123-135.
21. Lin, C.S., M.R. Binns, and L.P. Levkovitch. 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Sci. 26:894-900.
22. Mardia, K.V., J.T. Kent, and J.M. Bibby. 1988. Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, London.
23. Nabugoomu, F., R.A. Kempton, and M. Talbot. 1999. Analysis of series of trials where varieties differ in sensitivity to locations. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 4:310-325.
24. Nelder, J.A. 1965. The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. I. Block structure and the null hypothesis of variance. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 147-162.
25. Oakey, H., A. Verbyla, W. Pitchford, B. Cullis, and H. Kuchel. 2006. Joint modeling of additive and non-additive genetic line effects in single field trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113:809-819.
26. Palta, J.A., N.C. Turner, R.J. French, and B.J. Buirchell. 2007. Physiological responses of lupin genotypes to terminal drought in a Mediterranean-type environment. Ann. Appl. Biol. 150:269-279.
27. Patterson, H.D., and F. Nabugoomu. 1992. REML and the analysis of series of crop variety trials. p. 77-93. In Proc. from the 25th Int. Biometric Conf., Hamilton, NZ.
28. Patterson, H.D., V. Silvey, M. Talbot, and S.T.C. Weatherup. 1977. Variability of yields of cereal varieties in U.K. trials. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 89:238-245.
29. Piepho, H.-P. 1997. Analyzing genotype-environment data by mixed models with multiplicative terms. Biometrics 53:761-767.
30. Piepho, H.-P. 1998a. Empirical best linear unbiased prediction in cultivar trials using factor-analytic variance-covariance structures. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:195-201.
31. Piepho, H.-P. 1998b. Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 180:193-213.
32. Piepho, H.-P. 1999. Stability analysis using the SAS system. Agron. J. 91:154-160.
33. Piepho, H.-P., J.B. Denis, and F.A. van Eeuwijk. 1998c. Predicting cultivar differences using covariates. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 3:151-162.
34. Piepho, H.-P., J. Möhring, A.E. Melchinger, and A. Büchse. 2007. BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 56:310-333.
35. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
36. Shukla, G.K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29:237-245.
37. Singh, S.P., H. Terán, M. Lema, D.M. Webster, C.A. Strausbaugh, P.N. Miklas, H.F. Schwartz, and M.A. Brick. 2007. Seventyfive years of breeding dry bean of the Western USA. Crop Sci. 47:981-989.
38. Smith, A.B., B.R. Cullis, and R. Thompson. 2001. Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed model and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics 57:1138-1147.
39. Smith, A.B., B.R. Cullis, and R. Thompson. 2002. Exploring variety-Environment data using random effects AMMI models with adjustments for spatial fields trends: Part I. Theory. p. 323-336. In M.S. Kang (ed.) Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CAB Int., Oxford, UK.
40. Smith, A.B., B.R. Cullis, and R. Thompson. 2005. The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: An overview of current mixed model approaches. J. Agric. Sci. 143:449-462.
41. Sneller, C.H., L. Kilgore-Norquest, and D. Dombek. 1997. Repeatability of yield stability statistics in soybean. Crop Sci. 37:383-390.
42. Stefanova, K.T., A.B. Smith, and B.R. Cullis. 2009. Enhanced diagnostics for the spatial analysis of field trials. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 14:1-19.
43. Talbot, M. 1984. Yield variability of crop varieties in the UK. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 102:315-321.
44. Theobald, C., M. Talbot, and F. Nabugoomu. 2002. A Bayesian approach to regional and local-area prediction from crop variety trials. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 7:403-419.
45. Thompson, R., B.R. Cullis, A.B. Smith, and A.R. Gilmour. 2003. A sparse implementation of the average information algorithm for factor analytic and reduced rank variance models. Aust. N.Z. J. Stat. 45:445-460.
46. Wilkinson, G.N., S.R. Eckert, T.W. Hancock, and O. Mayo. 1983. Nearest neighbour (NN) analysis of field experiments (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 45:151-211.
47. Yan, W., and L.A. Hunt. 2002. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data. p. 289-303. In M.S. Kang (ed.) Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CAB Int., Oxford, UK.
48. Yan, W., L.A. Hunt, and Z. Szlavnics. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40:597-605.
49. Yan, W., M.S. Kang, B. Ma, S. Woods, and P.L. Cornelius. 2007. GGE Biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47:643-655.
50. Yang, R.-C., J. Crossa, P.L. Cornelius, and J. Burgueño. 2009. Biplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction: Proceed with caution. Crop Sci. 49:1564-1576.
51. Zimmerman, D.L., and D.A. Harville. 1991. A random field approach to the analysis of field plot experiments. Biometrics 47:223-239.