Do coder characteristics influence validity of ICD-10 hospital discharge data?

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Hennessy, Deirdre A ^a   Quan, Hude ^a   Faris, Peter D ^a   Beck, Cynthia A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

CANADA; FEMALE; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT DISCHARGE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77951043773     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-99     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes. L Iezzoni, Chicago: Health Administration Press 3 2003
2. Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database: A Validation Study. D Jurrlink C Preyra R Croxford A Chong P Austin JV Tu, Toronto: Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences 2006
3. Validity of information on comorbidity derived rom ICD-9-CCM administrative data. H Quan GA Parsons WA Ghali, Med Care 2002 40 8 675 85 10.1097/00005650-200208000-00007 12187181
4. Validity of procedure codes in International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification administrative data. H Quan GA Parsons WA Ghali, Med Care 2004 42 8 801 9 10.1097/01.mlr.0000132391.59713.0d 15258482
5. Assessing accuracy of diagnosis-type indicators for flagging complications in administrative data. H Quan GA Parsons WA Ghali, J Clin Epidemiol 2004 57 4 366 72 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.01.002 15135837
6. Data quality in an information-rich environment: Canada as an example. LL Roos S Gupta RA Soodeen L Jebamani, Can J Aging 2005 24 Suppl 1 153 70 Spring 10.1353/cja.2005.0055 16080132
7. Identifying priorities in methodological research using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data: report from an international consortium. C De Coster H Quan A Finlayson M Gao P Halfon KH Humphries, et al. BMC Health Serv Res 2006 6 77 10.1186/1472-6963-6-77 16776836
8. Coding of acute myocardial infarction. Clinical and policy implications. LI Iezzoni S Burnside L Sickles MA Moskowitz E Sawitz PA Levine, Ann Intern Med 1988 109 9 745 51 3142326
9. Comparison of coding of heart failure and comorbidities in administrative and clinical data for use in outcomes research. DS Lee L Donovan PC Austin Y Gong PP Liu JL Rouleau, et al. Med Care 2005 43 2 182 8 10.1097/00005650- 200502000-00012 15655432
10. Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program. SN Weingart LI Iezzoni RB Davis RH Palmer M Cahalane MB Hamel, et al. Med Care 2000 38 8 796 806 10.1097/00005650-200008000- 00004 10929992
11. Disease classification: measuring the effect of the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases on cause-of-death data in the United States. RN Anderson HM Rosenberg, Stat Med 2003 22 9 1551 70 10.1002/sim.1511 12704615
12. ICD coding changes and discontinuities in trends in cause-specific mortality in six European countries, 1950-99. F Janssen AE Kunst, Bull World Health Organ 2004 82 12 904 13 15654404
13. Assessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded database. H Quan B Li LD Saunders GA Parsons CI Nilsson A Alibhai, et al. Health Serv Res 2008 43 4 1424 41 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00822.x 18756617
14. Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. KJ O'Malley KF Cook MD Price KR Wildes JF Hurdle CM Ashton, Health Serv Res 2005 40 5 Pt 2 1620 39 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00444.x 16178999
15. Benchmarking variation in coding accuracy across the United States. DP Lorence IA Ibrahim, J Health Care Finance 2003 29 4 29 42 12908652
16. Reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10. J Stausberg N Lehmann D Kaczmarek M Stein, Int J Med Inform 2008 77 1 50 7 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.11. 005 17185030
17. Impact of the medical record credential on data quality. E Green C Benjamin, J Am Med Rec Assoc 1986 57 11 29 38 10280223
18. Is coding in theatres a viable option? A review of current theatre coding process at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. J Callen J Rust B Hines l Robertson J Killen, Journal of the Australian Confederation of Operating Room Nurses 1998 11 2 34
19. The quality of abstracting medical information from the medical record: the impact of training programmes. L Lorenzoni R Da Cas UL Aparo, Int J Qual Health Care 1999 11 3 209 13 10.1093/intqhc/11.3.209 10435841
20. Organisational factors affecting the quality of hospital clinical coding. S Santos G Murphy K Baxter KM Robinson, Him J 2008 37 1 25 37 18245862
21. Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases. W D'Hoore A Bouckaert C Tilquin, J Clin Epidemiol 1996 49 12 1429 33 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00271-5 8991959
22. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. ME Charlson P Pompei KL Ales CR MacKenzie, J Chronic Dis 1987 40 5 373 83 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 3558716
23. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. A Elixhauser C Steiner DR Harris RM Coffey, Med Care 1998 36 1 8 27 10.1097/00005650-199801000- 00004 9431328
24. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. M Charlson TP Szatrowski J Peterson J Gold, J Clin Epidemiol 1994 47 11 1245 51 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129- 5 7722560
25. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. H Quan V Sundararajan P Halfon A Fong B Burnand JC Luthi, et al. Med Care 2005 43 11 1130 9 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83 16224307
26. A coefficients of agreement for nominal scales. J Cohen, Edu and Psych Meas 1960 20 37 46 10.1177/001316446002000104
27. Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappa. G Chen P Faris B Hemmelgarn RL Walker H Quan, BMC Med Res Methodol 2009 9 5 10.1186/1471-2288-9-5 19159474
28. Manager's reports of variation in coding accuracy across U.S. oncology centers. DP Lorence A Spink R Jameson, J Oncol Manag 2002 11 6 20 6 12502289
29. Coding for quality measurement: the relationship between hospital structural characteristics and coding accuracy from the perspective of quality measurement. P Rangachari, Perspect Health Inf Manag 2007 4 3 18066353
30. Health Records Department Staffing in the Calgary Calgary. S Bulloch, 2009
31. Coding variation in CIHI discharge abstract database data. CIHI, Canadian Institute of Health Research 2003
32. Australian coder workforce survey 2002 - managers' responses. K McKenzie S Walker M Spallek, Journal (Inst Health Rec Inf Manag) 2003 44 2 8 14 12868220