A descriptive comparison of ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation of the internal jugular vein to landmark-based subclavian vein cannulation

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 416-422

  Theodoro, Daniel ^a   Bausano, Brian ^a   Lewis, Lawrence ^a   Evanoff, Bradley ^a   Marin, Kollef ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Catheterization; Central venous; Emergency medicine; Interventional; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; ECHOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PNEUMOTHORAX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SELF REPORT; SUBCLAVIAN VEIN; SUBCLAVIAN VEIN CATHETER; WORK EXPERIENCE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CRITICAL ILLNESS; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JUGULAR VEINS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUBCLAVIAN VEIN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 77951039294     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: 15532712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00703.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. DeFrances CJ, Hall MJ. 2002 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data. 2004; 342:1-30.
2. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348:1123-1133 (Pubitemid 36337324)
3. Ameh V, Jones S. Central venous catheterization: internal jugular or subclavian approach? Emerg Med J. 2007; 24:662-663
4. Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramer MR. Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access-a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30:454-460 (Pubitemid 34158135)
5. Leung J, Duffy M, Finckh A. Real-time ultrasonographically-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department increases success rates and reduces complications: a randomized, prospective study. Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 48:540-547 (Pubitemid 44574442)
6. Milling TJ Jr, Rose J, Briggs WM, et al. Randomized, controlled clinical trial of point-of-care limited ultrasonography assistance of central venous cannulation: the Third Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program (SOAP-3) Trial. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33:1764-1769 (Pubitemid 41153702)
7. Climo M, Diekema D, Warren DK, et al. Prevalence of the use of central venous access devices within and outside of the intensive care unit: results of a survey among hospitals in the Prevention Epicenter Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003; 24:942-945 (Pubitemid 38029562)
8. Lorente L, Henry C, Martin MM, Jimenez A, Mora ML. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters. Crit Care. 2005; 9:R631-5.
9. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324:370-376
10. Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD. Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002; 14:269-276
11. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324:377-384
12. Wilson RM, Harrison BT, Gibberd RW, Hamilton JD. An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Austral. 1999; 170:411-415
13. Bo-Linn GW, Anderson DJ, Anderson KC, McGoon MD. Percutaneous central venous catheterization performed by medical house officers: a prospective study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1982; 8:23-29
14. Eisenhauer ED, Derveloy RJ, Hastings PR. Prospective evaluation of central venous pressure (CVP) catheters in a large city-county hospital. Ann Surg. 1982; 196:560-564
15. Fisher NC, Mutimer DJ. Central venous cannulation in patients with liver disease and coagulopathy-a prospective audit. Inten Care Med. 1999; 25:481-485
16. Mansfield PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD, Gregurich MA, Ota DM. Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331:1735-1738
17. Martin MJ, Husain FA, Piesman M, et al. Is routine ultrasound guidance for central line placement beneficial? A prospective analysis. Curr Surg. 2004; 61:71-74 (Pubitemid 38145817)
18. Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001; 286:700-707 (Pubitemid 33010363)
19. Peres PW. Positioning central venous catheters-a prospective survey. Anaesth Intens Care. 1990; 18:536-539
20. Sessler CN, Glauser FL. Central venous cannulation done by house officers in the intensive care unit: a prospective study. South Med J. 1987; 80:1239-1242
21. Rothschild JM. Ultrasound guidance of central vein catheterization. In: Markowitz AJ (ed). Making Health Care Safer. San Francisco, CA: University of California at San Francisco (UCSF)-Stanford University Evidence-based Practice Center, 2001, pp. 245-253
22. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Emergency Medicine Guidelines, 2009. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/RRC-110/110- guidelines.asp. Accessed Jan 8, 2010.
23. Melniker L, Milling TJ, Briggs WM. Development and validation of a scale for the clarity of anatomical landmarks for use in outcomes research of ultrasound guidance of central venous cannulation [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13:e368.
24. Miller AH, Roth BA, Mills TJ, Woody JR, Longmoor CE, Foster B. Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9:800-805 (Pubitemid 34863237)
25. Milling T, Holden C, Melniker L, Briggs WM, Birkhahn R, Gaeta T. Randomized controlled trial of single-operator vs. two-operator ultrasound guidance for internal jugular central venous cannulation. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13:245-247 (Pubitemid 43303775)
26. Gualtieri E, Deppe SA, Sipperly ME, Thompson DR. Subclavian venous catheterization: greater success rate for less experienced operators using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med. 1995; 23: 692-697
27. Moore CL, Molina AA, Lin H. Ultrasonography in community emergency departments in the United States: access to ultrasonography performed by consultants and status of emergency physician-performed ultrasonography. Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 47:147-153 (Pubitemid 43121083)
28. Kaiser CW, Koornick AR, Smith N, Soroff HS. Choice of route for central venous cannulation: subclavian or internal jugular vein? A prospective randomized study. J Surg Oncol. 1981; 17:345-354 (Pubitemid 11052193)
29. Bold RJ, Winchester DJ, Madary AR, Gregurich MA, Mansfield PF. Prospective, randomized trial of Doppler-assisted subclavian vein catheterization. Arch Surg. 1998; 133:1089-1093
30. Fluman KR, Theodoro DL, Adhikari S. Emergency physician attitudes regarding ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation [abstract]. Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 51:545.