Plantar shear stress distribution in athletic individuals with frictional foot blisters

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 116-120

  Yavuz, Metin ^a   Davis, Brian L ^b  

^a Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951036672     PISSN: 87507315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7547/1000116     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. CUA AB, WILHELM KP, MAIBACH HI: Frictional properties of human skin: relation to age, sex and anatomical region, stratum corneum hydration and transepidermal water loss. Br J Dermatol 123: 473, 1990.
2. KNAPIK JJ, HAMLET MP, THOMPSON KJ, ET AL: Influence of boot-sock systems on frequency and severity of foot blisters. Mil Med 161: 594, 1996.
3. BRENNAN FH: Managing blisters in competitive athletes. Curr Sports Med Rep 1: 319, 2002.
4. XING M, PAN N, ZHONG W, ET AL: Skin friction blistering: computer model. Skin Res Technol 13: 310, 2007.
5. SPENCE WR, SHIELDS MN: Prevention of blisters, callosities and ulcers by absorption of shear forces. JAPA 58: 428, 1968.
6. MAILLER EA, ADAMS BB: The wear and tear of 26.2: dermatological injuries reported on marathon day. Br J Sports Med 38: 498, 2004.
7. POLLIACK AA, SCHEINBERG S: A new technology for reducing shear and friction forces on the skin: implications for blister care in the wilderness setting. Wilderness Environ Med 17: 109, 2006.
8. PATTERSON HS, WOOLLEY TW, LEDNAR WM: Foot blister risk factors in an ROTC summer camp population. Mil Med 159: 130, 1994.
9. TAYLOR CM, RIORDAN FA, GRAHAM C: New football boots and toxic shock syndrome. BMJ 332: 1376, 2006.
10. YAVUZ M, BOTEK G, DAVIS BL: Plantar shear stress distributions: comparing actual and predicted factional forces at the foot-ground interface. J Biomech 40: 3045, 2007.
11. Bus SA, DE LANGE A: A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 20: 892, 2005.
12. MCPOIL TG, CORNWALL MW, DUPUIS L, ET AL: Variability of plantar pressure data: a comparison of the two-step and midgait methods. JAPMA 89: 495, 1999.
13. YAVUZ M, TAJADDINI A, BOTEK G, ET AL: Temporal characteristics of plantar shear distribution: relevance to diabetic patients. J Biomech 41: 556, 2008.
14. KIISTALA U: Dermal-epidermal separation. Ann Clin Res 4: 236, 1972.
15. GREENHALGH DG, LAWLESS MB, CHEW BB, ET AL: Temperature threshold for burn injury: an oximeter safety study. J Burn Care Rehabil 25: 411, 2004.
16. HALL M, SHURR DG, ZIMMERMAN MB, ET AL: Plantar foot surface temperatures with use of insoles. Iowa Orthop J 24: 72, 2004.
17. SCHMIDT H, HATTEL J, WERT J: An analytical model for the heat generation in friction stir welding. Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng 12: 143, 2004.
18. ZMITROWICZ A: Constitutive models for anisotropic frictional heat. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 38: 563, 1995.
19. GRABINER MD, FEUERBACH JW, LUNDIN TM, ET AL: Visual guidance to force plates does not influence ground reaction force variability. J Biomech 28: 1115, 1995.
20. YAVUZ M, ERDEMIR A, BOTEK G, ET AL: Peak plantar pressure and shear locations: relevance to diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 30: 2643, 2007.