Assessing the accuracy of using aggregated traffic traces in network engineering

Telecommunication Systems

Volumn 43, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 223-236

  Janowski, Lucjan ^a   Owezarski, Philippe ^a  

^a LAAS CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Aggregated vs. real traffic; Aggregation scale; Loss probability; Unit translation

Indexed keywords

ARRIVAL TIME; IN-NETWORK; LOSS PROBABILITY; MARKED POINT PROCESS; PACKET-DROP PROBABILITY; PERFORMANCE MODEL; PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS; REAL TRAFFIC; TRAFFIC PARAMETERS; TRAFFIC TRACES;

PACKET LOSS;

PROBABILITY;

EID: 77951024277     PISSN: 10184864     EISSN: 15729451     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11235-009-9210-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723.
2. Bhattacharyya, S., Diot, C., & Jetcheva, J. (2001). Pop-level and access-link-level traffic dynamics in a tier-1 pop. In IMW '01: proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Internet measurement (pp. 39-53). New York: ACM.
3. Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
4. Cleary, J., Donnelly, S., Graham, I.,McGregor, A., & Pearson, M. (2000). Design principles for accurate passive measurement. In PAM2000 passive and active measurement workshop (pp. 1-7), May 2000.
5. Crovella, M., & Bestavros, A. (1996). Self-similarity in world wide web traffic: Evidence and possible causes. Performance Evaluation Review, 24(1), 160-169. Also, in Proceedings of SIGMETRICS' 96: the ACM international conference on measurement and modeling of computer systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May 1996.
6. Fraleigh, C., Moon, S., Lyles, B., Cotton, C., Khan, M., Moll, D., Rockell, R., Seely, T., & Diot, C. (2003). Packet-level traffic measurements from the sprint ip backbone. IEEE Network, 17(6), 6-16.
7. Garrett, M. W., & Willinger, W. (1994). Analysis, modeling and generation of self-similar VBR video traffic. In SIGCOMM (pp. 269-280).
8. Janowski, L., Ziegler, T., & Hasenleithner, E. (2006). A scaling analysis of umts traffic. In NEW2AN (pp. 211-222). (Pubitemid 44070973)
9. Leland, W. E., Taqqu, M. S., Willinger, W., & Wilson, D. V. (1994). On the self-similar nature of Ethernet traffic (extended version). IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2(1), 1-15.
10. McCullagh, P., & Nelders, J. (1991). Generalized linear models (2nd edn.). London: Chapman & Hall.
11. METROSEC (2005). Metrology for security and quality of service. http://www.laas.fr/METROSEC/.
12. NIST (2002). NIST/SEMATECH e-handbook of statistical methods. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook.
13. NLANR (2003). Measurement & network analysis, Auckland-VIII. http://pma.nlanr.net/Special/auck8.html.
14. Norros, I. (1994) A storage model with self-similar input.
15. Packet statistics for Auckland-VIII 20031209, 2003. http:// pma.nlanr.net/Special/auck8/20031209-p.html.
16. Park, K., & Willinger, W. (2000). Self-similar network traffic and performance evaluation. New York: Wiley.
17. Prasad, R. S., Dovrolis, C., & Thottan, M. (2007). Router buffer sizing revisited: the role of the output/input capacity ratio. In J. Kurose & H. Schulzrinne (Eds.), CoNEXT (p. 15). New York: ACM.
18. Scherrer, A., Larrieu, N., Borgnat, P., Owezarski, P., & Abry, P. (2007). Non-Gaussian and long memory statistical characterisations for Internet traffic with anomalies. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 4(1), 56-70. (Pubitemid 46384621)
19. Sheluhin, O., Smolskiy, S., & Osin, A. (2007). Self-similar processes in telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
20. The R project for statistical computing. (2008). http://www. r-project.org/.
21. Troubleshooting output drops with priority queueing (August 2005). http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/ priorityqueuedrops.pdf.
22. Wang, Z. (2001). Internet QoS-architecture and mechanisms for quality of service. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann.