Pitfalls of prenatal ultrasound screening in diagnostics of serious inborn developmental defects of the kidney and urinary pathways prospective study and preliminary results;Úskalí prenatálního ultrazvukového screeningu v diagnostice závažných vrozených vývojových vad ledvin a močových cest Prospektivní studie, předběžné výsledky

Cesko-Slovenska Pediatrie

Volumn 63, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 606-613

  Flogelova H ^a,d   Smakal O ^a   Halek J ^a,b   Michalkova K ^c   Geier, P ^a   Koranda, P ^c   Doubrava, L ^b   Janout, V ^a  

^a PALACKÝ UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OLOMOUC   (Czech Republic)

^c I chirurgicka klinika FN   (Czech Republic)

^d Ústav Lékařské Biofyziky A Biometrie LF UP A FN ^*  (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Inborn developmental defects of the kidney; Prenatal and postnatal ultrasound screening

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951023460     PISSN: 00692328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: Introduction to the system used by the society for fetal urology. Pediatr. Radiol. 1993; 23: 478-480.
2. Dinkel E, Ertel M, Dittrich M, Peters H, Berres M, et al. Kidney size in childhood. Sonographical growth charts for kidney length and volume. Pediatr. Radiol. 1985; 15: 38-43.
3. Levi S, Hyjazi Y, Schaaps J-P, Defoori P, Colon R, Buekens P. Sensitivity and specifity of routine antenatal screening of congenital anomalies by ultrasound: The Belgian multicentric study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1991; 1: 102-110.
4. Grandjean H, Larroque D, Levi S, and the Eurofetus Study Group. The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999; 181: 446-454.
5. Riccabona M. Assessment and management of newborn hydronephrosis. World J. Urol. 2004; 22: 73-78.
6. Beetz R, Bökenkamp A, Brandis M, Hoyer P, John U, Rascher W. Diagnostik bei konatalen Dilatationen der Harnwege. Urologe A 2001; 40: 495-509.
7. Dudley JA, Haworth JM, McGraw ME, Frank JD, Tizard EJ. Clinical revelance and implications of antenatal hydronephrosis. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997; 76: 31-34.
8. Bhide A, Sairam S, Farrugia MK, Boddy SA, Thilaganathan B. The sensitivity of antenatal ultrasound for predicting renal tract surgery in early childhood. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 25: 489-492.
9. Dremsek PA, Gindl K, Voitl P, Strobl R, Hafner E, et al. Renal pyelectasis in fetuses and neonates: diagnostic value of renal pelvis diameter in pre- and postnatal sonographic screening. AJR 1997; 168: 1017-1019.
10. Narchi H. Postnatal ultrasound: a minimum requirement for moderate antenatal renal pelvic dilatation. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006; 91: 154-155.
11. Gramellini D, Fieni S, Caforio E, Benassi G, Bedochi L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter as a predictor of significant postnatal nephrouropathy: second versus third trimester of pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 194: 167-173.
12. Ismaili K, Hall M, Donner C, Thomas D, Vermeylen D, Avni FE. Results of systematic screening for minor degrees of fetal renal pelvis dilatation in an unselected population. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003; 188: 242-246.
13. Damen-Elias HAM, De Jong TPVM, Stigter RH, Visser GHA, Stoutenbeek PH. Congenital renal tract anomalies: otcome and follow-up of 402 cases detected antenatally between 1986 and 2001. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 25: 134-143.
14. Bouzada MCF, Oliveira EA, Pereira AK, Leite HV, Rodrigues AM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter as a predictor of uropathy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 24: 745-749.
15. John U, Kähler Ch, Schulz S, Mentzel HJ, Vogt S, Misselwitz J. The impact of fetal renal pelvic diameter on postnatal outcome. Prenat. Diagn. 2004; 24: 591-595.
16. Odibo AO, Marchiano D, Quinones JN, Riesch D, Egan JFX, Macones GA. Mild pyelectasis: evaluating the relationship between gestational age and renal pelvic anterior-posterior diameter. Prenat. Diagn. 2003; 23: 824-827.
17. Bouzada MCF, Oliveira EA, Pereira AK, Leite HV, Rodrigues AM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of postnatal renal pelvic diameter as a predictor of uropathy: a prospective study. Pediatr. Radiol. 2004; 34: 798-804.