Rhetoric of innovation policy making in hong kong using the innovation systems conceptual approach

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 408-434

  Sharif, Naubahar ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Hong Kong; Innovation systems; Policy making; Rhetoric

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951015064     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0162243909337120     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Albert, Mathieu, and Suzanne Laberge. 2007. The legitimation and dissemination processes of the innovation system approach: The case of Canadian and Québec science and technology policy. Science, Technology and Human Values 32:221-49.
2. Baark, Erik, and Naubahar Sharif. 2006. Hong Kong's innovation system in transition. In Asian innovation systems in transition, pp. 123-147. ed. B.-Å. Lundvall, P. Intarakumnerd, and J. Vang. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
3. Edquist, Charles. 1997. Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions, and organizations. London: Pinter.
4. Edquist, Charles, and Leif Hoemmen. 2008. National innovation systems in ten small countries. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
5. European Commission. 1996. First action plan for innovation in Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission.
6. European Commission. 2002. Innovation policy in Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission.
7. Fagerberg, Jan. 2005. Innovation: A guide to the literature. In Oxford Handbook of Innovations, ed. J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Godin, Benoît. 2005a. Measurement and statistics on science and technology: 1920 to the present. London: Routledge.
9. Godin, Benoît. 2005b. The knowledge-based economy: Conceptual framework or buzz-word? Journal of Technology Transfer 31:17-30.
10. Godin, Benoît. 2006. The linear model of innovation: The Historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology & Human Values 31:639-67.
11. Government of Canada. 2002. National summit on innovation and learning: Canada's innovation strategy. Ottowa: Government of Canada.
12. Government of New Zealand. 2002. Growing an innovative New Zealand. Aukland: Government of New Zealand.
13. Guston, David H. 2000. Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Halfon, Saul. 2006. The disunity of consensus: International population policy coordination as socio-technical practice. Social Studies of Science 36:783-807.
15. Hellström, Tomas, and Merle Jacob. 2005. Taming unruly science and saving national competitiveness: Discourses on science by Sweden's strategic research bodies. Science, Technology & Human Values 30:443-67.
16. HKSAR. 1998. Commission on innovation and technology first report. Hong Kong SAR.
17. HKSAR. 1999. Commission on innovation and technology second report. Hong Kong SAR.
18. HKSAR, Census and Statistics Department, Science and Technology Statistics Section. 2002. Report on 2002 annual survey of innovation activities in the business sector. Hong Kong SAR.
19. HKSAR, Innovation and Technology Commission. 2004. New strategy of innovation and technology development. Hong Kong SAR.
20. Irwin, Alan. 2006. The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 36:299-320.
21. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2004. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.
22. Kivinen, Osmo, and Jukka Varelius. 2003. The emerging field of biotechnology- The case of Finland. Science, Technology & Human Values 28:141-61.
23. Kline, Stephen J., and Nathan Rosenberg. 1986. An overview of innovation. In The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth, 275-305. ed. R. Landau & N. Rosenberg. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24. Kraemer, Kenneth, L., Siegfried Dickhoven, Susan Fallows Tierney, and John Leslie King. 1987. Datawars: The politics of modeling in federal policymaking. New York: Columbia University Press.
25. Larédo, Philippe, and Philippe Mustar. 2001. Research and innovation policies in the new global economy: An international comparative analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
26. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke. 1992. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
29. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke. 1998. Why study national systems and national styles of innovation? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10:407-21.
30. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke, Patarapong Intarakumnerd, and Jan Vang. 2006. Asian innovation systems in transition. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
31. Metcalfe, Stan. 1995. The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In Handbook of the economics of innovations and technological change, 409-512. ed., P. Stoneman. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
32. Miettinen, Reijo. 2002. National innovation system: Scientific concept or political rhetoric. Helsinki: Edita Prima Ltd.
33. Mytelka, Lynn, and Keith Smith. 2002. Policy learning and innovation theory: An interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy 31:1467-79.
34. National Technology Agency of Finland. 2002. Benchmarking innovation systems: Government funding for R&D. Helsinki: National Technology Agency of Finland.
35. Nelson, Richard R. 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. OECD. 1992. Technology and the economy: The key relationships. Paris: OECD.
37. OECD. 1994. The measurement of scientific and technical activities: Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. Frascati Manual. Paris: OECD.
38. OECD. 1996. Innovation, patents, and technological strategies. Paris: OECD.
39. OECD. 1997a. National innovation systems. Paris: OECD.
40. OECD. 1997b. Oslo manual: Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Paris: OECD.
41. OECD. 1999. Managing national innovation systems. Paris: OECD.
42. Parayil, Govindan, and T.T. Sreekumar. 2004. Industrial Development and the dynamics of innovation in Hong Kong. International Journal of Technology Management 27:369-92.
43. Radosevic, Slavo. 1998. Defining systems of innovation: A methodological discussion. Technology in Society 20:75-86.
44. Reppy, Judith. 2000. Conceptualizing the role of defense industries in national systems of innovation. In The place of the defense industry in national systems of innovation, ed., J. Reppy. Ithaca, NY: Peace Studies Program, Cornell University.
45. Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46. Sharif, Naubahar. 2006a. Emergence and development of the national innovation systems concept. Research Policy 35:745-66.
47. Sharif, Naubahar. 2006b. An examination of recent developments in Hong Kong's innovation system: 1990 to the present. Science and Public Policy 33:505-18.
48. Sismondo, Sergio. 2004. An introduction to science and technology studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
49. Stenekes, Nyree, Hal K. Colebatch, David T. Waite, and Nick J Ashbolt. 2006. Risk and governance in water recycling: Public acceptance revisited. Science, Technology & Human Values 31:107-34.
50. Tung, Chee-Hwa. 1997. Annual policy address: Building Hong Kong for a new era. Hong Kong: HKSAR Government.
51. Tuunainen, Juha. 2005. Contesting a hybrid firm at a traditional university. Social Studies of Science 35:173-210.
52. UK Office of Science and Technology. 2002. Investing in innovation: A strategy for science, engineering and technology. London: Office of Science and Technology.