A comparison of retinal prosthesis electrode array substrate materials

Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Engineering the Future of Biomedicine, EMBC 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 4140-4143

  Weiland, James D ^a,b,c   Humayun, Mark S ^a,b,c   Eckhardt, Helmut ^d   Ufer, Stefan ^d   Laude, Lucien ^a   Basinger, Brooke ^c   Tai, Yu Chong ^e  

^a DOHENY EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c University of Southern California   (United States)

^d California Institute of Technology ^*  (United States)

^e California Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; ELECTRODES; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PROSTHETICS; SUBSTRATES;

COMPETING REQUIREMENTS; CRITICAL COMPONENT; ELECTRODE ARRAYS; MULTI CHANNEL; NEURAL STIMULATOR; NEURAL TISSUE; RETINAL PROSTHESIS; STATE OF THE ART; STIMULATING ELECTRODES; SUBSTRATE MATERIAL;

SILICONES;

EID: 77950986726     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5332751     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. E Margalit and S Sadda. Retinal and Optic Nerve Diseases, Artif. Organs, 2003 Nov;27(11):963-974
2. E Zrenner, Will retinal implants restore vision? Science, 2002 295(5557):1022-1025
3. J. Weiland, W. Liu, M. Humayun. Retinal Prosthesis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2005;7:361-401.
4. D. Yanai, J. Weiland, M. Mahadevappa, et. al. Visual performance using a retinal prosthesis in three subjects with retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 May;143(5):820-827.
5. G. Dagnelie. Psychophysical Evaluation for Visual Prosthesis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2008
6. T. Stieglitz, M. Schuetter, K.P. Koch. Implantable Biomedical Microsystems for Neural Prosthesis. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 24(5): 58-65.