The Role of issue-framing functions in affecting beliefs and opinions about a sociopolitical issue

Communication Quarterly

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 247-265

  Dardis, Frank E ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmentalism; Framing; Issue Framing; Persuasion; Social Movements

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950984799     PISSN: 01463373     EISSN: 17464102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463370701290525     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alicke, M. D., (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126 (4), 556–574.
2. Anderson, N. H., (1991). Psychodynamics of everyday life: Blaming and avoiding blame. In N. H., Anderson (Ed.), Contributions to information integration theory Volume II: Social (pp. 243–275). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A., (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
4. Blaikie, N. W. H., (1992). The nature and origins of ecological worldviews: An Australian study. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 144–165.
5. Brackney, M., & McAndrew, F. T., (2001). Ecological worldviews and receptivity to different types of arguments for preserving endangered species. The Journal of Environmental Education, 33 (1), 17–20.
6. Davis, J. J., (1995). The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72 (2), 285–299.
7. Dorris, J. W., (1972). Reactions to unconditional cooperation: A field study emphasizing variables neglected in laboratory research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22 (3), 387–397.
8. Druckman, J. N., (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23 (3), 225–256.
9. Entman, R., (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43 (4), 51–58.
10. Ferrari, J. R., & Leippe, M. R., (1992). Noncompliance with persuasive appeals for a prosocial, altruistic act: Blood donating. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22 (2), 83–101.
11. Festinger, L., (1962). Cognitive dissonance. Scientific American, 207 (4), 93–107.
12. Gamson, W. A., (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G., (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114–125.
14. Gleicher, F., & Petty, R. E., (1992). Expectations of reassurance influence the nature of fear-stimulated attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 86–100.
15. Goffman, E., (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Hallahan, K., (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 205–242.
17. Klandermans, B., (1988). The formation and mobilization of consensus. In B., Klandermans, H., Kriesi & S., Tarrow (Eds.), International social movement research (vol. 1, pp. 173–196). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18. Kosicki, G. M., & Pan, Z., (1996). Framing analysis: An approach to media effects.
19. Lord, K. R., (1994). Motivating recycling behavior: A quasi-experimental investigation of message and source strategies. Psychology and Marketing, 11 (4), 341–358.
20. Marwell, G., & Schmitt, D. R., (1967). Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry, 30, 350–364.
21. Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M., (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The Journal of Politics, 61 (4), 1040–1067.
22. Olien, C. N., Tichenor, P. J., & Donohue, G. A., (1989). Media coverage and social movements. In C. T., Salmon (Ed.), Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change (pp. 139–163). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
23. Ryan, C., (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing. Boston: South End Press.
24. Ryan, C., Carragee, K. M., & Meinhofer, W., (2001). Framing, the news media, and collective action. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45 (1), 175–182.
25. Schmitt, D. R., (1964). The invocation of moral obligation. Sociometry, 27 (3), 299–310.
26. Smith, G. L., & Heath, R. L., (1990). Moral appeals in Mobil Oil's op-ed campaign. Public Relations Review, 16 (4), 48–54.
27. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D., (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B., Klandermans, H., Kriesi & S., Tarrow (Eds.), International social movement research (vol. 1, pp. 197–217). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
28. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D., (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. M., Morris & C., McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133–155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29. Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Jr., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D., (1986). Frame alignment process, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51 (4), 464–481.
30. Tittle, C. R., & Rowe, A. R., (1973). Moral appeal, sanction threat, and deviance: An experimental test. Social Problems, 20 (4), 488–498.
31. Tucker, K., Derelian, D., & Rouner, D., (1997). Public relations writing: An issue-driven behavioral approach (ed.), 3rd. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32. Van Scoy, K., (2000, March). How green is my Silicon Valley? PC Computing, 13, 56–58.
33. Weiner, B., (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.