A comparison between fractured Xience-like and Palmaz-like stents using a novel computational model

Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Engineering the Future of Biomedicine, EMBC 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1106-1108

  Tambača, Josip ^a   Čanić, Sunčica ^b   Paniagua, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

^b University of Houston   (United States)

^c BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; DISEASES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NUMERICAL METHODS; ONE DIMENSIONAL; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; STRUTS;

BENDING FORCE; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; CORONARY STENTS; DYNAMIC CONTACTS; ENDOVASCULAR STENTS; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; NUMERICAL COMPUTATIONS; UNIFORM COMPRESSION;

STENTS;

EID: 77950983967     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5334427     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J.L. Berry, A. Santamarina, J.E. Moore Jr., S. Roychowdhury, and W.D. Routh. Experimental and Computational Flow Evaluation of Coronary Stents Annal of Biomedical Engineering 28 (2000) 386-398.
2. C. Dumoulin and B. Cochelin. Mechanical behavior modeling of balloon-expandable stents Journal of Biomechanics 33(11) (2000) 1461-1470.
3. A.O. Frank, P.w. Walsh and J.E. Moore Jr. Computational Fluid Dynamics and Stent Design Artificial Organs 26(7) (2002) 614-621.
4. G. Hausdorf. Mechanical and Biophysical Aspects of Stents,in Catheter Based Devices for the Treatment of Non-coronary Cardiovascular Diseases in Adults and Children. Ed. P. Syamasundar Rao and Morton J. Kern. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2003.
5. V. Hoang, Stent Design and Engineered Coating Over Flow Removal Tool, Team #3 (Vimage), 10/29/04.
6. KW Lau, A. Johan, U. Sigwart, JS Hung, A stent is not just a stent: stent construction and design do matter in its clinical performance, Singapore Medical Journal 45 (2004) 7, 305-312.
7. McClean Dougal R, MD, Eigler N, MD, Stent Design: Implications for Restenosis, MedReviews, LLC 2002.
8. F. Migliavacca, L. Petrini, M. Colombo, F. Auricchio, R. Pietrabissa. Mechanical behavior of coronary stents investigated through the finite element method Jurnal of Biomechanics 35 (2002) 803-811.
9. J.E. Moore Jr. and J.L. Berry. Fluid and Solid Mechanical Implications of Vascular Stenting. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 30 (2002) 498-508.
10. A.C. Morton, D. Crossman, J. Gunn., The influence of physical stent parameters upon restenosis, Pathologie Biologie 52 (2004) 196-205.
11. L.H. Timmins, M.R. Moreno, C.A. Meyer, J.C. Criscione, A. Rachev and J.E. Moore Jr. Stented artery biomechanics and device design optimization. Med. Bio. Eng. Comput 45 (2007) 505-513.
12. J. Tambača, M. Kosor, S. Čanić, D. Paniagua. Mathematical Modeling of Vascular Stents. SIAM J Applied Mathematics. Conditionally Accepted 2009.
13. A. N. Makaryusm, L. Lefkowitz and A. D. K. Lee, Coronary artery stent fracture. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23 (2007) 305-309.
14. F. Shaikh, R. Maddikunta, M Djelmami-Hani, J. Solis, S. Allaqaband, and T. Bajwa. Stent fracture, an incidental finding or a significant marker of clinical in-stent restenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 71 (2008) 614-618.
15. A. Carter. Stent strut fracture: Seeing is believing. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 71 (2008) 619-620.
16. MX Issues Update. "At TCT, New Studies Support Drug-Eluting Stents," 2008 Canon Communications LLC. http://devicelink.com/mx/ issuesupdate/08/10/TCT.html