The Rover Task Force: A case study in proactive and reactive policy intervention?*

Regional Science Policy and Practice

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 109-124

  Bailey, David ^a   MacNeill, Stewart ^a  

^a Birmingham Graduate School   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

automotive industry; cluster policy; industrial policy; L52; L62; MG Rover; N94; R11; R58; regional development agencies; Rover Task Force

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950977143     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17577802     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1757-7802.2008.00007.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Accelerate (2002) URL: http://www.accelerate.co.uk
2. Andersson T, Serger S, Sörvik J, Hansson E (2004) The cluster policies whitebook. IKED, Mälmo
3. Andriani P, Jones C, Perkmann M, De Propris L, Sena V et al. (2005). Challenging clusters. The prospects and pitfalls of clustering for innovation and economic development. AIM Research, London
4. Armstrong K (2006) Life after MG Rover: A report prepared for BBC Radio 4. London, The Work Foundation
5. Armstrong K, Bailey D, De Ruyter A, Mahdon H, Thomas H (2008) The impact of plant closures on workers: A comparison of MG Rover in the UK and Mitsubishi in Australia. Policy Studies 29: 343–355
6. Asheim B, Cooke P, Martin R (2006) Clusters and regional development: Critical reflections and explorations. Routledge, London
7. AWM (1999) Creating Advantage. The West Midlands Economic Strategy. Advantage, Birmingham
8. AWM (2001) Agenda for action spring 2001. Advantage, Birmingham
9. Ayers S, Mawson J, Pearce G (2002) Institutional collaboration in the West Midlands region. In: Tomaney J, Mawson J, (eds) England: The state of the regions. Policy Press, Bristol
10. Bailey D (2003a) Globalisation, regions and cluster policies: The case of the Rover Task Force. Policy Studies 24: 67–85
11. Bailey D (2003b) Does the EU need a transnationals policy? The BMW-Rover affair as a case of corporate, strategic and government failure. Birmingham Business School Working Paper, 2003-11
12. Bailey D, De Propris L (2007) Industrial and regional policies in an enlarging Europe. Policy Studies 28: 291–294
13. Bailey D, Kobayashi S, MacNeill S (2008) Rover and out? Globalisation, the West Midlands auto cluster, and the end of MG-Rover. Policy Studies 29: 267–279
14. Benneworth P (2001) Regional development agencies: The early years. Regional Studies Association, Seaford
15. Benneworth P, Henry N (2004) Where is the value added in the cluster approach? Hermeneutic theorising, economic geography and clusters as a multiperspectival approach. Urban Studies 41: 1011–1023
16. The Birmingham Post (2006a) Could DTI have stopped this becoming this? 14/03/06
17. The Birmingham Post (2006b) Aerospace creates three times as many jobs as automotive. 20 April
18. The Birmingham Post (2008) Longbridge news is a step in the right direction. 10 May
19. Birmingham Mail (2005). The real cost of Rover's collapse. 21 September
20. BSEDF (Birmingham and Solihull Economic Development Forum). 2005. Economic review 2005/6. Birmingham and Solihull Economic Development Forum, Birmingham
21. Burfitt A, Ferrari E (2008) The housing and neighbourhood impacts of knowledge-based economic development following industrial closure. Policy Studies 29: 293–304
22. Burfitt A, MacNeill S, Gibney J (2007) The dilemmas of operationalising cluster policy: The medical technology cluster in the West Midlands. European Planning Studies 15: 1273–1290
23. Camagni R (1991) Local ‘milieu’, uncertainty and innovation networks: Towards a new dynamic theory of economic space. In: Camagni R (ed) Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. Belhaven, London
24. Cowling M, Isles N (2005) Sent to Coventry? The re-employment of the Longbridge 5000. The Work Foundation, London
25. DTI. (Department of Trade and Industry) (1998) Our competitive future: Building the knowledge driven economy. White Paper. TSO, London
26. DTI. (Department of Trade and Industry) (2003) Criteria for success in cluster development. Report by ECOTEC Consulting Ltd. DTI, London
27. DTI/DfES (Department of Trade and Industry and Department for Education and Science) (2001) Opportunity for all in a world of change. White Paper on enterprise, skills and innovation. TSO, London
28. De Propris L (2000) Innovation and inter-firm co-operation: The case of the West Midlands. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 9: 421–446
29. Enright MJ (2001) Regional clusters: What we know and what we should know. Paper presented at the Kiel Institute International Workshop on Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition. November
30. Fuller C, Bennett RJ, Ramsden, M (2002) The economic development role of English RDAs: The need for greater discretionary power. Regional Studies 36: 421–428
31. Gough J (2003) The genesis and tensions of the English regional development agencies. European Urban and Regional Studies 10: 23–38
32. Holweg M, Oliver N (2005) Who killed MG Rover? The Cambridge-MIT Institute, Cambridge
33. House of Commons (2004) Support to businesses from regional development agencies. Fifth Report of Session 2003–04, Trade and Industry Committee. TSO, London
34. House of Commons (2006) The Committee of Public Accounts. The closure of MG Rover. Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence. HC10013. TSO, London
35. House of Commons. Trade and Industry Committee (2007). Success and failure in the UK car manufacturing industry. Fourth report of session 2006–07. Report together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence. HC399. TSO, London
36. Hussain M (2007) Is UK innovation on track? New Statesman 5 March: 28–29
37. Hutton W (1999) Why Rover was driven out of UK hands. In: Hutton, W (ed) The stakeholder society. Writings in politics and economics. Polity Press, Oxford
38. Hutton W (2007) Manufacturing is still critically important New Statesman 5 March: 4–6
39. Keeble D, Lawson C, Moore B, Wilkinson F (1999) Collective learning processes, networking and ‘institutional thickness’ in the Cambridge region, Regional Studies 33: 319–332
40. Leitch S (2005) Skills in the UK: The long term challenge. TSC, London
41. Lundequist P, Power D (2002) Putting Porter into practice? Practices of regional cluster building: Evidence from Sweden. European Planning Studies 10: 685–704
42. MacNeill S (2003) The West Midlands automotive cluster. Report for the European Monitoring Centre for Change (EMCC). URL: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/emcc/publications/2004/ef0493en2.pdf
43. MacNeill S, Srbljanin A, Bentley G (2001) Rover task force supply chain support phase 1: Evaluation. Report for Birmingham Chamber of Industry and Commerce. University of Birmingham, Birmingham
44. Malecki EJ (1997) Technology and economic development: The dynamics of local, regional and national competitiveness. Longman, Harlow
45. Martin R, Sunley P (2003) Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea? Journal of Economic Geography 3: 5–35
46. Mawson, J (2000) Whitehall, devolution and the English regions. In: Bentley G, Gibney J (eds) Regional development agencies and business change. Ashgate, Aldershot
47. National Audit Office (2006) The collapse of MG Rover. HC961 Session 2005–6. The Stationery Office, London
48. Office of National Statistics (2007) Annual Business Inquiry. ONS, London
49. Oughton C, De Propris L, MacNeill S (1996) The West Midlands regional innovation strategy. Advantage West Midlands, Birmingham
50. Peck F, McGuinness D (2003) Regional development agencies and cluster strategies: Engaging the knowledge-base in the North of England. Local Economy 18: 49–62
51. Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan, London
52. Porter ME (1998) Clusters and the new economic competition. In Margretta J (ed) Managing in the new economy. Harvard Business School, Cambridge MA
53. Raines P (ed) (2002) Cluster development and policy. Ashgate, Burlington VT
54. Roberts P, Benneworth P (2001) Pathways to the future? An initial assessment of RDA strategies and their contribution to integrated regional development. Local Economy 16:142–159
55. Robson B, Peck J, Holden A (2000) Regional agencies and area-based regeneration. Joseph Rowntree Foundation and The Policy Press, Bristol
56. Rosenfeld S (2002) Creating smart systems. A guide to cluster strategies in less favoured regions. European Commission, Brussels
57. Rover Task Force (RTF1). (2000) Final report and recommendations to the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry. Advantage West Midlands, Birmingham
58. Rover Task Force (RTF2). (2006) Final update report: The work goes on. Advantage West Midlands, Birmingham
59. Rowthorn R, Coutts K (2004) Deindustrialisation and the balance of payments in advanced economies. Cambridge Journal of Economics 28: 767–790
60. Sadler D (2004) Cluster evolution, the transformation of old industrial regions and the steel industry supply chain in North-east England. Regional Studies 38: 55–66
61. Steiner M (2006) Do clusters ‘think’? An institutionalist perspective on knowledge creation and diffusion in clusters. In: Asheim B, Cooke P, Martin R (eds) Clusters and regional development: Critical reflections and explorations. Routledge, London
62. Storper M (1997) The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. Guilford, New York
63. Storper M, Salais R (1997) Worlds of production: The action frameworks of the economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
64. Tilson B (1997) Survey of firms in the automotive components sector in the West Midlands region. Final report for the West Midlands Development Agency. Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham
65. Tully J, Berkeley N (2004) Visualising the operating behaviour of SMEs in sector and cluster: Evidence from the West Midlands. Local Economy 19: 38–54
66. Waters R, Lawton Smith H (2002) Regional development agencies and local economic development: Scale and competitiveness in high-technology Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire. European Planning Studies 10: 633–649
67. Webb D, Collis C (2000) Regional development agencies and the ‘new regionalism’ in England. Regional Studies 34: 857–864