How do health care providers perceive technologies for monitoring older adults?

Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Engineering the Future of Biomedicine, EMBC 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 4315-4318

  Thompson, Hilaire J ^a   Thielke, Stephen M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE;

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; CLINICAL UTILITY; HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS; HUMAN INTERACTIONS; MONITORING TECHNOLOGIES; NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS; OBJECTIVE INFORMATION; RECORDING ACTIVITIES;

HEALTH RISKS;

EID: 77950967681     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333599     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. de Bruin M, Hospers HJ, van den Borne HW, Kok G, Prins JM, Theory- and evidence-based intervention to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected patients in the Netherlands: a pilot study. AIDS Patient Care STDS, vol.19, pp.384-394, 2005.
2. Martin S, Kelly G, Kernohan WG, McCreight B, Nugent C, Smart home technologies for health and social care support. Cochrane Database Syst Rev vol.4, CD006412 2008.
3. Beaudin JS, Intille SS, Morris ME, To track or not to track: user reactions to concepts in longitudinal health monitoring. J Med Internet Res, vol.8(4):e29, 2006.
4. Sandelowski M, Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health, vol.23, pp. 334-340, 2000.
5. Harlow HF, Love in infant monkeys. Sci Am, vol.200, pp. 68-74, 1959.