Transport and its enhancement caused by coupling

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Li, Jing Hui ^a   Chen, Qing Hu ^b   Zhou, Xing Fei ^a  

^a NINGBO UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL EXPRESSIONS; DICHOTOMOUS NOISE; JOSEPHSON JUNCTION ARRAYS; LATTICE SYSTEM; MEAN FIELD APPROXIMATION; NEAREST NEIGHBORS; PROBABILITY CURRENT; PROTEIN MOTORS; TRANSPORT THEORY;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

ELECTRON TRANSITIONS;

EID: 77950949970     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.041104     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Noise and Order: The New Synthesis, edited by, M. Millonas, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996).
2. L. Gammaitoni, P. Hänggi, P. Jung, and F. Marchesoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223 (1998). 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.223
3. R. Benzi, A. Sutera, and A. Vulpiani, J. Phys. A 14, L453 (1981) 10.1088/0305-4470/14/11/006
4. R. Benzi, G. Parisi, A. Sutera, and A. Vulpiani, Tellus 34, 10 (1982) 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1982.tb01787.x
5. C. Nicolis and G. Nicolis, Tellus 33, 225 (1981). 10.1111/j.2153-3490. 1981.tb01746.x
6. J.-H. Li and S.-G. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 014102 (2004) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.014102
7. J.-H. Li, Europhys. Lett. 82, 50006 (2008) 10.1209/0295-5075/82/50006
8. J.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. E 76, 021113 (2007) 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.021113
9. M. Perc, Phys. Rev. E 78, 036105 (2008) 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.036105
10. T. Kondo and T. Munakata, Phys. Rev. E 79, 061121 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.061121
11. P. Reimann, Phys. Rep. 361, 57 (2002) 10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00081-3
12. J.-H. Li and Z.-Q. Huang, Phys. Rev. E 58, 139 (1998) 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.139
13. J.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. E 74, 011114 (2006) 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.011114
14. J.-H. Li, Phys. Rev. E 76, 031120 (2007) 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.031120
15. M. Kostur, J. Luczka, and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. E 80, 051121 (2009) 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.051121
16. J.-H. Li, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 115702 (2010). 10.1088/0953-8984/22/11/115702
17. C. Van den Broeck, J. M. R. Parrondo, and R. Toral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3395 (1994) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.3395
18. J.-H. Li and Z. Q. Huang, Phys. Rev. E 53, 3315 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.3315
19. S. Pikovsky, K. Rateitschak, and J. Kurths, Z. Phys. B 95, 541 (1994) 10.1007/BF01313365
20. F. Castro, A. D. Sanchez, and H. S. Wio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1691 (1995) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1691
21. J.-H. Li and Z.-Q. Huang, Phys. Rev. E 58, 2760 (1998) 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.2760
22. J.-H. Li, Z. Q. Huang, and D. Y. Xing, Phys. Rev. E 58, 2838 (1998) 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.2838
23. P. Reimann, C. Van den Broeck, and R. Kawai, Phys. Rev. E 60, 6402 (1999) 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.6402
24. J.-H. Li, and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. E 64, 011106 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.011106
25. C. R. Doering and J. C. Gadoua, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2318 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2318
26. M. Bier and R. D. Astumian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1649 (1993) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1649
27. U. Zürcher and C. R. Doering, Phys. Rev. E 47, 3862 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevE.47.3862
28. P. Reimann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4576 (1995) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4576
29. J. Iwaniszewski, Phys. Rev. E 54, 3173 (1996) 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.3173
30. J.-H. Li, D. Y. Xing, J. M. Dong, and B. Hu, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1324 (1999) 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.1324
31. J.-H. Li and Y.-X. Han, Phys. Rev. E 74, 041118 (2006) 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.041118
32. J.-H. Li and Y.-X. Han, Phys. Lett. A 359, 573 (2006). 10.1016/j.physleta.2006.07.055
33. T. Novotny and P. Chvosta, Phys. Rev. E 63, 012102 (2000) 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.012102
34. B. Dybiec and E. Gudowska-Nowak, Phys. Rev. E 66, 026123 (2002) 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.026123
35. J.-H. Li, J. Phys. A 40, 621 (2007). 10.1088/1751-8113/40/4/004
36. O. Flomenbom and J. Klafter, Phys. Rev. E 69, 051109 (2004) 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.051109
37. B. Dybiec and E. Gudowska-Nowak, Phys, Rev. E 69, 016105 (2004) 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.016105
38. J.-H. Li, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2007, P09004 (2007). 10.1088/1742-5468/2007/09/P09004
39. R. Gommers, P. Douglas, S. Bergamini, M. Goonasekera, P. H. Jones, and F. Renzoni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 143001 (2005) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.143001
40. I. Klik and Y. D. Yao, Phys. Rev. E 71, 067102 (2005) 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.067102
41. J.-H. Li, Physica A 389, 7 (2010). 10.1016/j.physa.2009.07.039
42. J. Kula, T. Czernik, and J. Luczka, Phys. Lett. A 214, 14 (1996). 10.1016/0375-9601(96)00172-7
43. J. Kula, T. Czernik, and J. Luczka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1377 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1377
44. S. Klumpp, A. Mielke, and C. Wald, Phys. Rev. E 63, 031914 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.031914
45. H. C. Fogedby, R. Metzler, and A. Svane, Phys. Rev. E 70, 021905 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.021905
46. A. Igarashi, S. Tsukamoto, and H. Goko, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051908 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.051908
47. R. C. Desai and R. Zwanzig, J. Stat. Phys. 19, 1 (1978). 10.1007/BF01020331
48. J. J. Brey, J. M. Casado, and M. Morillo, Physica A 128, 497 (1984) 10.1016/0378-4371(84)90188-2
49. L. L. Bonilla, J. Stat. Phys. 46, 659 (1987) 10.1007/BF01013379
50. L. L. Bonilla, J. M. Casado, and M. Morillo, J. Stat. Phys. 48, 571 (1987) 10.1007/BF01019689
51. M. Shiino, Phys. Rev. A 36, 2393 (1987). 10.1103/PhysRevA.36.2393
52. C. W. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Method for Physics, Chemistry and Natural Science (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983)
53. H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984).
54. In general, the definition that a dichotomous noise is symmetric or not is made as follows. First, we assume that η (t) is a general dichotomous noise which takes two values u and w ( u and w can be zero, positive or negative, the transition rate from u to w is λ1 and vice versa is λ2). Then, if η (t) =0, we can get u λ2 +w λ1 =0, i.e., -u/w= λ1 / λ2. Now, if -u/w=1, we say that the dichotomous noise η (t) is symmetric; otherwise, we say that it is asymmetric. Here, we must notice that if η (t) even if -u/w=1, we can not say that η (t) is symmetric.
55. K. K. Mon and S. Teitel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 673 (1989). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.673
56. Q.-H. Chen, L.-H. Tang, and P. Tong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067001 (2001) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.067001
57. J.-P. Lv, H. Liu, and Q.-H. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 79, 104512 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.104512
58. The relationship between the stationary probability current J and stationary average velocity V s = dx/dt V s for Eq. is s = (d-c ) J (see Ref.).
59. J. Houlrik, A. Jonsson, and P. Minnhagen, Phys. Rev. B 50, 3953 (1994) 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.3953
60. B. J. Kim, P. Minnhagen, and P. Olsson, Phys. Rev. B 59, 11506 (1999) 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.11506
61. Q.-M. Nie, M.-B. Luo, and Q.-H. Chen, Phys. Lett. A 350, 274 (2006). 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.09.080
62. D. C. Ralph and R. A. Buhrman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2118 (1992) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2118
63. B. Golding, N. M. Zimmerman, and S. N. Coppersmith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 998 (1992) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.998
64. C. J. Muller, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, and L. J. de Jongh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 140 (1992) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.140
65. J. M. Krans, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, and L. J. de Jongh, Physica B 218, 228 (1996) 10.1016/0921-4526(95)00601-X
66. R. J. P. Keijsers, O. I. Shklyarevskii, and H. van Kempen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3411 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3411
67. A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987). 10.1103/RevModPhys.59.1
68. R. D. Astumian and M. Bier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1766 (1994) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1766
69. J.-H. Li and Z. Q. Huang, Phys. Rev. E 57, 3917 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.3917
70. A. B. Kolomeisky and H. Phillips III, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, S3887 (2005) 10.1088/0953-8984/17/47/017
71. E. B. Stukalin, H. Phillips III, and A. B. Kolomeisky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 238101 (2005) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.238101
72. E. B. Stukalin and A. B. Kolomeisky, Phys. Rev. E 73, 031922 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.031922
73. A. G. Hendricks, B. I. Epureanu, and E. Meyhofer, Phys. Rev. E 79, 031929 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.031929
74. A. F. Taylor and G. R. Smith, Nature (London) 423, 889 (2003). 10.1038/nature01674
75. For a colored Gaussian noise, one can note (without a proof) that, usually, the results (or properties) of stochastic particles subject to a this noise (Gaussian colored) are the same as the ones for an equivalent system driven by a symmetric dichotomous noise.
76. If we add a thermal (Gaussian white) noise in Eq., two methods can be used for us to solve the problem. One is the numerical simulation method directly using the Langevin equation, but this will result in a long-time calculation for the workstations or computers and, of course, we cannot get the exact (or approximate) analytical formula for the stationary probability current. The other is the method using the method in Ref. together with the mean-field approximation in Ref. but, for this method, the exact (or approximate) analytical formula for the stationary probability current cannot be gotten because of the complexity caused by the coupling.
77. J.-H. Li, Physica D 226, 209 (2007). 10.1016/j.physd.2006.12.002