Including minor modes of transport in a tour-based mode choice model with household interactions

Journal of Transportation Engineering

Volumn 135, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 935-945

  Roorda, Matthew J ^a   Passmore, Dylan ^a   Miller, Eric J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; Modal split; Simulation models; Transportation models

Indexed keywords

HOUSEHOLD INTERACTION; LEVEL OF SERVICE; MODAL SPLIT; MODE CHOICE; MODE CHOICE MODELS; MODEL PARAMETERS; NICHE MARKETS; PUBLIC TRANSIT; RIDE-SHARING; SIMULATION MODEL; TORONTO; TOUR-BASED MODEL; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRANSPORTATION MODEL; TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING; UTILITY FUNCTIONS;

BUSES; LAND USE;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; GENETIC ALGORITHM; NUMERICAL MODEL; SIMULATION; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRAVEL DEMAND;

CANADA;

EID: 77950949730     PISSN: 0733947X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000072     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Algers S. Daly A.J. Widlert S. Modeling travel behaviour to support policy making in Stockholm. Understanding travel behaviour in an era of change 1997, P. Stopher, M. Lee-Gosselin,eds. Pergamon, Oxford.
2. Aultman-Hall L.M. Commuter bicycle route choice: Analysis of major determinants and safety implications. 1996,Ph.D. thesis, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ont.
3. Axhausen K.W. Smith R.L. Bicyclist link evaluation: a stated-preference approach. Transp. Res. Rec. 1986, 1085:7-15. TRREDM, 0361-1981
4. Beser M. Algers S. SAMPERS-The new Swedish national travel demand forecasting tool. National transport models: Recent developments and prospects 2002, L. Lundqvist, L.-G. Mattsson,eds., Springer, Stockholm.
5. Bhat C. Sardesai R. The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice. Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol. 2006, 40(9):709-730. TRBMDY, 0191-2615, 10.1016/j.trb.2005.09.008
6. Bhat C.R. A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol. 1995, 29(6):471-483. TRBMDY, 0191-2615, 10.1016/0191-2615(95)00015-6
7. Bhat C.R. Accommodating flexible substitution patterns in multi-dimensional choice modeling: Formulation and application to travel mode and departure time choice. Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol. 1998a, 32(7):455-466. TRBMDY, 0191-2615, 10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00011-3
8. Bhat C.R. Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice modeling. Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract. 1998b, 32(7):495-507. TRPPEC, 0965-8564, 10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00011-1
9. Boile M.P. Spasovic L.N. Bladikas A.K. Modeling intermodal auto-rail commuter networks. Transp. Res. Rec. 1995, 1516:38-47. TRREDM, 0361-1981
10. Bradley M. Outwater M.L. Jonnalagadda N. Ruiter E.R. Estimation of activity-based microsimulation model for San Francisco. CD Proc., 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB 2001 NRC, Washington, D.C.
11. Coleman J. An improved mode choice model for the Greater Toronto Area travel demand modeling system. Working paper 2002 Joint Program in Transportation, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
12. TTS Version 3: Data Guide 1997, Data Management Group Joint Program in Transportation, University of Toronto, Toronto.
13. Davidson WSynthesis of first practices and operational research approaches in activity-based travel demand modeling. Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract. 2007, 41(5):464-488. TRPPEC, 0965-8564, 10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.003
14. Ewing R. Schroeer W. Greene W. School location and student travel: Analysis of factors affecting mode choice. Transp. Res. Rec. 2004, 1895:55-63. TRREDM, 0361-1981, 10.3141/1895-08
15. Hess D.B. The effects of free parking on commuter mode choice: Evidence from travel diary data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2001, 1753:35-42. TRREDM, 0361-1981, 10.3141/1753-05, .
16. Hunt J.D. Abraham J. Influences on bicycle use. Transportation 2007, 34:453-470. TRPOB6, 0049-4488, 10.1007/s11116-006-9109-1
17. Hunt J.D. McMillan J. Stefan K. Estimation of a weekend choice model for Calgary. Proc., 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB 2007, and (CD-ROM), NRC, Washington, D.C.
18. Jonnalagadda N. Freedman J.W. Davidson A. Hunt J.D. Development of microsimulation activity-based model for San Francisco: Destination and mode choice models. Transp. Res. Rec. 2001, 1777:25-35. TRREDM, 0361-1981, 10.3141/1777-03,
19. Koppelman F.S. Wen C.-.H. The paired combinatorial logit model: Properties, estimation and application. Proc., 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB 1997NRC, Washington, D.C.
20. Manski C.F. Lerman S.R. The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica 1977, 45(8):1977-1988. ECMTA7, 0012-9682, 10.2307/1914121
21. Miller E.J. The Greater Toronto Area travel demand modeling system, version 2.0: Vol. 1. Model overview 2001a Joint Program in Transportation, University of Toronto, Toronto.
22. Miller E.J. The Greater Toronto Area travel demand modeling system, version 2.0: Vol. III. User's manual 2001b Joint Program in Transportation, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
23. Miller E.J. Roorda M.J. Carrasco J.A. A tour-based model of travel mode choice. Transportation 2005, 32(4):399-422. TRPOB6, 0049-4488, 10.1007/s11116-004-7962-3
24. Ortúzar J.D. Willumsen L. Modeling transport 2001, and Wiley, Chichester, N.Y.
25. Replogle M. Integrating pedestrian and bicycle factors into regional transportation planning models-Summary of the state of the art and suggested steps forward 1995 Environmental Defence Fund, Washington, D.C.
26. Roorda M.J. Carrasco J.A. Miller E.J. An integrated model of vehicle transactions, activity scheduling and mode choice. Transp. ResPart B: Methodol. 2009, 43(2):217-229. TRBMDY, 0191-2615, 10.1016/j.trb.2008.05.003
27. Roorda M.J. Miller E.J. Kruchten N. Incorporating within-household interactions into a mode choice model using a genetic algorithm for parameter estimation. Transp. Res. Rec. 2006, 1985:171-179. TRREDM, 0361-1981, 10.3141/1985-19
28. Vovsha P. The cross-nested logit model: Application to mode choice in the Tel-Aviv Metropolitan Area. Proc76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB 1997 NRC, Washington, D.C.
29. Vovsha P. Petersen E. Escorting children to school: Statistical analysis and applied modeling approach. CD Proc84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB 2005NRC, Washington, D.C.
30. Vovsha P. Petersen E. Donnelly R. Microsimulation in travel demand modeling: Lessons learned from the New York best practice model. Transp. Res. Rec. 2002, 1805:68-77. TRREDM, 0361-1981, 10.3141/1805-09
31. Vovsha P. Petersen E. Donnelly R. Explicit modeling of joint travel by household members: Statistical evidence and applied approach. Transp. Res. Rec. 2003, 1831:1-10. TRREDM, 0361-1981, 10.3141/1831-01
32. Vovsha P. Petersen E. Donnelly R. Impact of intra-household interactions on individual daily activity travel patterns. CD Proc83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB 2004NRC, Washington, D.C.
33. Walker J. Ben-Akiva M. Extensions of the random utility model. Working paper 2001MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
34. Wen C.-.H. Koppelman F.S. An integrated model system of stop generation and tour formation for the analysis of activity and travel patterns. Transp. Res. Rec. 1999, 1676:136-144. TRREDM, 0361-1981, 10.3141/1676-17