Multivariate statistical approach to structural damage detection

Journal of Engineering Mechanics

Volumn 136, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 12-22

  Wang, Zengrong ^a   Ong, K C G ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Methodology; Statistics; Structural dynamics; Structural health monitoring

Indexed keywords

CONTROL CHARTS; DAMAGE INDICATOR; DATA ANALYSIS; ESTIMATED PARAMETER; FREQUENCY DOMAIN RESPONSE; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE DATA; MULTIVARIATE EXPONENTIALLY WEIGHTED MOVING AVERAGE CONTROL CHART; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL APPROACHES; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; STORY SHEAR; STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DETECTION; TIME DOMAIN RESPONSE; UPPER CONTROL LIMIT; VIBRATION RESPONSE;

DATA HANDLING; FLOWCHARTING; FREQUENCY RESPONSE; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPECIAL EFFECTS; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS); VIBRATION ANALYSIS;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

DAMAGE; DETECTION METHOD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHOD; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; VIBRATION;

EID: 77950945724     PISSN: 07339399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2010)136:1(12)     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Carden E.P. Fanning P. Vibration based condition monitoring: A review. Struct. Health Monit. 2004, 3(4):355-377. 1475-9217, 10.1177/1475921704047500
2. Chang F.-K. Proc., 1st-6th Int. Workshops on Structural Health Monitoring 2007 Stanford Univ. Stanford, Calif.
3. Ching J. Beck J.L. Bayesian analysis of the Phase II IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring experimental benchmark data. J. Eng. Mech. 2004, 130(10):1233-1244. JENMDT, 0733-9399, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:10(1233)
4. Doebling S.W. Farrar C.R. Prime M.B. A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock Vib. Dig. 1998, 30(2):91-105. SHVDAN, 0583-1024, 10.1177/058310249803000201
5. Fanning P. Carden E.P. Auto-regression and statistical process control techniques applied to damage indication in telecommunication masts. Key Eng. Mater. 2001, 204-205:251-260. KEMAEY, 1013-9826, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.204-205.251
6. Farrar C.R. Dynamic characterization and damage detection in the I-40 Bridge over the Rio Grande. 1994, Los Alamos National Laboratory Rep. No.LA-12767-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M.
7. Fugate M.L. Sohn H. Farrar C.R. Vibration-based damage detection using statistical process control. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2001, 15(4):707-721. MSSPEP, 0888-3270, 10.1006/mssp.2000.1323
8. Giraldo D.F. Dyke S.J. Caicedo J.M. Damage detection accommodating varying environmental conditions. Struct. Health Monit. 2006, 5(2):155-172. 1475-9217, 10.1177/1475921706057987
9. Jensen W.A. Jones-Farmer L.A. Champ C.W. Woodall W.H. Effects of parameter estimation on control chart properties: A literature review. J. Quality Technol. 2006, 38(4):349-364. JQUTAU, 0022-4065,
10. Johnson R.A. Wichern D.W. Applied multivariate statistical analysis 2002, and 5th EdPrentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
11. Kullaa J. Damage detection of the Z24 Bridge using control charts. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2003, 17(1):163-170. MSSPEP, 0888-3270, 10.1006/mssp.2002.1555
12. Lam H.F. Katafygiotis L.S. Mickleborough N.C. Application of a statistical model updating approach on Phase I of the IASC-ASCE structural health monitoring benchmark study. J. Eng. Mech. 2004, 130(1):34-48. JENMDT, 0733-9399, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:1(34)
13. Lowry C.A. Woodall W.H. Champ C.W. Rigdon S.E. A multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics 1992, 34(1):46-53. TCMTA2, 0040-1706, 10.2307/1269551
14. Montgomery D.C. Introduction to statistical quality control 2005, 5th EdWiley, New York.
15. Nair K.K. Kiremidjian A.S. Time series based structural damage detection algorithm using Gaussian mixtures modeling. ASME J. Dyn. SystMeasControl 2007, 129(3):285-293. JDSMAA, 0022-0434, 10.1115/1.2718241
16. Nair K.K. Kiremidjian A.S. Law K.H. Time series-based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure. J. Sound Vib. 2006, 291(1-2):349-368. JSVIAG, 0022-460X, 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.06.016
17. Pi Y.L. Mickleborough N.C. Modal identification of vibrating structures using ARMA model. J. Eng. Mech. 1989a, 115(10):2232-2250. JENMDT, 0733-9399, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:10(2232)
18. Pi Y.L. Mickleborough N.C. Modal identification of a vibrating structure in the time domain. Comput. Struct. 1989b, 32(5):1105-1115. CMSTCJ, 0045-7949, 10.1016/0045-7949(89)90412-4
19. Sohn H. Czarnecki J.A. Farrar C.R. Structural health monitoring using statistical process control. J. Struct. Eng. 2000a, 126(11):1356-1363. JSENDH, 0733-9445, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:11(1356)
20. Sohn H. Farrar C.R. Hemez F.M. Shunk D.D. Stinemates D.W. Nadler B.R. A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996-2001. 2003, , andLos Alamos National Laboratory Rep. No.LA-13976-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M.
21. Sohn H. Fugate M.L. Farrar C.R. Damage diagnosis using statistical process control. 1999Los Alamos National Laboratory Rep. No.LA-UR-99-6059, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M.
22. Sohn H. Fugate M.L. Farrar C.R. Damage diagnosis using statistical process control. Proc7th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Structural Dynamics 2000b . Southampton, U.K.
23. Stoumbos Z.G. Sullivan J.H. Robustness to non-normality of the multivariate EWMA control chart. J. Quality Technol. 2002, 34(3):260-276. JQUTAU, 0022-4065
24. Testik M.C. Runger G.C. Borror C.M. Robustness properties of multivariate EWMA control charts. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int 2003, 19(1):31-38. QREIE5, 0748-8017, 10.1002/qre.498
25. Vanik M.W. Beck J.L. Au S.K. Bayesian probabilistic approach to structural health monitoring. J. Eng. Mech. 2000, 126(7):738-745. JENMDT, 0733-9399, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:7(738)
26. Wang Z. Ong K.C. G. Autoregressive coefficients based Hotelling's T2 control chart for structural health monitoring. Comput. Struct. 2008, 86(19-20):1918-1935. CMSTCJ, 0045-7949, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.02.007
27. Wang Z. Ong K.C. G. Structural damage detection using autoregressive-model-incorporating multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Eng. Struct. 2009, 31(5):1265-1275. ENSTDF, 0141-0296, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.01.023
28. Wei W.W. S. Time series analysis: Univariate and multivariate methods 2006, 2nd EdAddison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
29. Worden K. Manson G. Fieller N.R. J. Damage detection using outlier analysis. J. Sound Vib. 2000, 229(3):647-667. JSVIAG, 0022-460X, 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2514
30. Yuen K.-V. Au S.K. Beck J.L. Two-stage structural health monitoring approach for Phase I benchmark studies. J. Eng. Mech. 2004, 130(1):16-33. JENMDT, 0733-9399, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:1(16)
31. Zamba K.D. Hawkins D.M. A multivariate change-point model for statistical process control. Technometrics 2006, 48(4):539-549. TCMTA2, 0040-1706, 10.1198/004017006000000291