Effects of Four Instruments on Coronal Pre-enlargement by Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 858-861

  Sanfelice, Cintia Mussoline ^a   da Costa, Fernanda Botega ^a   Reis Só, Marcus Vinícius ^b   Vier Pelisser, Fabiana ^a   Souza Bier, Carlos Alexandre ^c   Grecca, Fabiana Soares ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAXIAS DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; endodontic; image analysis; risk zone

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH PULP;

CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MOLAR; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 77950932053     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Lee S.J., Wu M.K., and Wesselink P.R. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from different-sized simulated plastic root canals. Int Endod J 37 (2004) 607-612
2. Abou-Rass M., Frank A.L., and Glick D.H. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc 101 (1980) 792-794
3. Vanni J.R., Santos R., Limongi O., Guerisoli D.M.Z., Capelli A., and Pécora J.D. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary molars: SE analysis. Braz Dent J 16 (2005) 181-186
4. Barroso J.M., Guerisoli D.M.Z., Capelli A., Saquy P.C., and Pécora J.D. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary premolars: SEM analysis. Braz Dent J 16 (2005) 30-34
5. Ibelli G.S., Barroso J.M., Capelli A., Spanó J.C.E., and Pécora J.D. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination in maxillary lateral incisors. Braz Dent J 18 (2007) 102-106
6. Mahran A.H., and AboEl-Fotouh M. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography. J Endod 34 (2008) 1219-1222
7. Hartmann M.S.M., Barletta F.B., Fontanella V.R.C., and Vanni J.R. Canal transportation after root canal instrumentation: a comparative study with computed tomography. J Endod 33 (2007) 962-965
8. Baratto Filho F., Zaitter S., Haragushiku G.A., de Campos E.A., and Abuabara A. Correr GM: Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. J Endod 35 (2009) 337-342
9. Gluskin A.H., Brown D.C., and Buchanan L.S. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. Int Endod J 34 (2001) 476-484
10. Estrela C. Endodontic science. 2nd ed. (2009), Artes Médicas Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil 1223
11. Bergmann L., Van Cleynenbreugel J., Beullens M., Wevers M., Van Meerbeek B., and Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi Rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36 (2003) 288-295
12. Zhang L., Luo H.X., Zhou X.D., Tan H., and Huang D.M. The shaping effect of the combination of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod 34 (2008) 456-458
13. López F.U., Fachin E.V.F., Fontanella V.R.C., Barletta F.B., Só M.V.R., and Grecca F.S. Apical transportation: a comparative evaluation of three root canal instrumentation techniques with three different apical diameters. J Endod 34 (2008) 1545-1548