Of mice and humans: Are they the same? - Implications in cancer translational research

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 501-504

  De Jong, Marion ^a   Maina, Theodosia ^b  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b INSTITUTE OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY   (Greece)

Author keywords

Drug development; Orthotopic subcutaneous tumors; Syngeneic xenogeneic tumors; Translational studies

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; RADIOISOTOPE;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL CARE; CANCER MODEL; CANCER RESEARCH; CARCINOGENESIS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SCREENING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HUMAN; ISOGRAFT; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOLID TUMOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TRANSGENIC MOUSE; TUMOR MODEL; TUMOR SCINTISCANNING; XENOGRAFT; ANIMAL; BODY SIZE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE MODEL; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; NEOPLASM; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTISCANNING; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HUMANS; MICE; NEOPLASMS; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

EID: 77950930742     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.065706     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Sausville EA, Newell DR. Preclinical models in cancer drug discovery and development. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:783-784.
2. Teicher BA. Tumor models for efficacy determination. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006; 5:2435-2443.
3. Sausville EA, Burger AM. Contributions of human tumor xenografts to anticancer drug development. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3351-3354.
4. Wall RJ, Shani M. Are animal models as good as we think? Theriogenology. 2008;69:2-9.
5. Mather S. Molecular imaging with bioconjugates in mouse models of cancer. Bioconjug Chem. 2009;20:631-643.
6. Lyons SK. Advances in imaging mouse tumour models in vivo. J Pathol. 2005; 205:194-205.
7. Aravalli RN, Golzarian J, Cressman ENK. Animal models of cancer in interventional radiology. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1049-1053.
8. Koo V, Hamilton PW, Williamson K. Non-invasive in vivo imaging in small animal research. Cell Oncol. 2006;28:127-139. (Pubitemid 44427396)
9. Maina T, Nock BA, Zhang H, et al. Species differences of bombesin analogs with GRP-R define the choice of animal models in the development of GRP-R-targeting drugs. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:823-830. (Pubitemid 43750761)
10. Greve JM, Les AS, Tang BT, et al. Allometric scaling of wall shear stress from mice to humans: quantification using cine phase-contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291:H1700-H1708.
11. Wolf G, Abolmaali N. Imaging tumour-bearing animals using clinical scanners. Int J Radiat Biol. 2009;85:752-762.
12. Hanusch C, Hoeger S, Beck GC. Anaesthesia of small rodents during magnetic resonance imaging. Methods. 2007;43:68-78. (Pubitemid 47285733)
13. Bebarta V, Luyten D, Heard K. Emergency medicine animal research: does use of randomization and blinding affect the results? Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10:684-687.
14. Perel P, Roberts I, Sena E, et al. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. Br Med J. 2007;334:197-200.