Chapter 4 Bioavailability: The underlying basis for risk-based land management

Developments in Soil Science

Volumn 32, Issue C, 2008, Pages 53-72

  Naidu, R ^a   Pollard, S J T ^a   Bolan, N S ^a   Owens, G ^a   Pruszinski, A W ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950924791     PISSN: 01660918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2481(07)32004-7     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council. National Health and Medical Research Council: Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites (1992), ANZECC, NHMRC, Canberra
2. Bardos, R.P., Vik, E., 2001a. Decision making for the remediation of contaminated sites. Presented at the ICS-UNIDO Expert Group Meeting on "Remediation of Polluted Sites in CEE Countries, Current Status and Perspectives".
3. Bardos, R.P., Vik, E., 2001b. A framework for selecting remediation technologies for contaminated Sites. Proceedings of the CLARINET Final Conference, Vienna, 21-22 June.
4. Bardos, R.P., Vik, E., 2001c. Summary of CLARINET's key findings on risk management solutions and decision support in Europe. Proceedings of the CLARINET Final Conference, Vienna, 21-22 June.
5. Bolan N.S., and Baskaran S. Biodegradation of 2,4-D herbicide as affected by its adsorption-desorption behaviour and microbial activity of soils. Aust. J. Soil Res. 34 (1996) 1041-1053
6. Brusseau M.L., and Rao P.S.C. The influence of sorbate-organic matter interactions on sorption nonequilibrium. Chemosphere 18 (1989) 1691-1706
7. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR), Environment Agency and Institute for Environment and Health. Guidelines for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management: Revised departmental guidance (2000), The Stationery Office, London
8. Ferguson, C., Darmendrail, D., Freier, K., Jensen, B.K., Jensen, J., Kasamas, H., Urselai, A., Vegter, J. (Eds.), 1998a. Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in Europe Volume 1: Scientific Basis. LQM Press, Nottingham.
9. Ferguson, C., Darmendrail, D., Freier, K., Jensen, B.K., Jensen, J., Kasamas, H., Urselai, A., Vegter, J., 1998b. Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in Europe Volume II-Policy, Land Quality Press, Nottingham.
10. Ferguson C., and Kasamas H. Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in Europe, Volume 2: Policy Frameworks (1999), LQM Press, Nottingham
11. Fischer F. The greening of risk assessment towards a participatory approach. In: Smith D. (Ed). Business and the Environment: Implications of the New Environmentalism (1993), Paul Chapman, London 98-115
12. Johnson R.M., and Sims J.T. Influence of surface and subsoil properties on herbicide sorption by Atlantic and coastal plain soils. Soil Sci. 155 (1993) 339-348
13. Linkov I., Satterstrom K., Kiker G., Ferguson E., and Bridges T. Multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: a review and framework for application to Superfund sites. In: Macey G.P., and Cannon J. (Eds). Reclaiming the Land: Rethinking Superfund Institutions, Methods and Practices (2005), Springer, New York
14. Naidu, R., 1996. Health risk assessment of arsenic contaminated site, unpublished.
15. Naidu R., Sumner M.E., and Harter R.D. Sorption of heavy metals in strongly weathered soils: an overview. J. Environ. Geochem. Health 20 (1998) 5-9
16. Natusch, J., 1997. Application and development of contaminated site remediation technologies in Australia. ANZAC Fellowship Report to Department of Internal Affairs, Wellington, New Zealand and Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Canberra, Australia.
17. National Academy of Sciences. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process (1983), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
18. NEPC, 1999. Impact Statement, in Assessment of Site Contamination. Draft National Environment Protection Measure and Impact Statement. National Environment Protection Council, Adelaide, 29 March.
19. Oscarson D.W., Huang P.M., Liaw W.K., and Hammer U.T. Kinetics of oxidation or arsenite by various manganese dioxides. Soil Sci. Society Am. J. 47 (1983) 644-648
20. Petts, J., Pollard, S.J.T., Gray, A.J., Orr, P., Homan, J., Delbridge, P., 2003. Involving lay audiences in environmental risk assessments. In: ConSoil 2003. Proceedings of the 8th International FZK/TNO Conference on Contaminated Land (Ghent, 12-16 May 2003), Theme D, pp. 2969-2978.
21. Pollard S.J.T., Brookes A., Earl N., Lowe J., Kearney T., and Nathanail C.P. Integrating decision tools for the sustainable management of land contamination. Sci. Tot. Environ. 325 1-3 (2004) 15-28
22. Pollard, S.J.T., Fisher, J., Twigger-Ross, C., Brookes, A., 2000. Approaches to decision support in the context of sustainable development. Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies for the Treatment of Contaminated Land (Phase III), Special Session, Decision Support Tools, NATO/CCMS Pilot Study.
23. Sadiq M. Arsenic chemistry in soils: an overview of thermodynamic predictions and field observations. Water Air Soil Pollut. 93 (1997) 117-136
24. Vig K., Megharaj M., Sethunathan N., and Naidu R. Bioavailability and toxicity of cadmium to microorganisms and their activities in soil: a review. Adv. Environ. Res. 8 (2002) 121-135