Engineering and the dual nature of technical artefacts

Cambridge Journal of Economics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 51-62

  Kroes, Peter ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dual nature; Intentionality; Ontology of technical artefacts; Physical structure; Technical artefact; Technical function

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; ENGINEERING; IDEOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; PHILOSOPHY;

EID: 77950921362     PISSN: 0309166X     EISSN: 14643545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bep019     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ASM Handbook: Materials Selection and Design, Vol. 20, 1997, Material Park, OH, ASM International.
2. Baker, L.R. 2008. The shrinking difference between artifacts and natural objects, American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, vol. 7, no. 2, 2-5.
3. Dennett, D.C. 1987. The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
4. Elder, C.L. 2007. On the place of artifacts in ontology, in Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (eds), Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representations, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
5. Hilpinen, R. 2004. Artifact, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2004 edn), in Zalta, E.N. (ed.), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/artifact/ [date last accessed 7 April 2009].
6. Houkes, W. and Meijers, A. 2006. The ontology of artefacts: the hard problem, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 37, no. 1, 118-31.
7. Houkes, W.N., Vermaas, P.E., Dorst, K. and De Vries, M.J. 2002. Design and use as plans: an action-theoretical account, Design Studies, vol. 23, no. 3, 303-20.
8. Kroes, P. 2002. Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts, Design Studies, vol. 23, 287-302.
9. Kroes, P. 2006. Coherence of structural and functional descriptions of technical artefacts, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 37, no. 1, 137-51.
10. Kroes, P. 2009. Technical artifacts, engineering practice, and emergence, in Krohs, U. and Kroes, P. (eds), Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds; Comparative Philosophical Perspectives, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
11. Kroes, P. and Meijers, A. 2006. The dual nature of technical artefacts-Introduction, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 37, no. 1, 1-4.
12. Losonsky, M. 1990. The nature of artifacts, Philosophy, vol. 65, 81-8.
13. Meijers, A.W.M. 2001. The relational ontology of technical artefacts, in Kroes, P.A. and Amsterdam, M.A.W. M. (eds), The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology Research in Philosophy and Technology, Vol 20, (series editor Carl Mitcham), Amsterdam, JAI/Elsevier.
14. Otto, K.N. and Wood, K.L. 2001. Product Design; Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.
15. Perlman, M. 2004. The modern philosophical resurrection of teleology, The Monist, vol. 97, no. 1, 3-51.
16. Ross, D. (ed.) 1970. Aristotle. Physica. The works of Aristotle, Vol. II, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
17. Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality, London, Penguin Books.
18. Simon, H.A. 1996 [1969]. The Sciences of the Artificial, third edn. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
19. Soavi, M. 2009. Realism and artifact kinds, in Krohs, U. and Kroes, P. (eds), Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds; Comparative Philosophical Perspectives, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
20. Thomasson, A.L. 2003. Realism and human kinds, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 67, no. 3, 580-609.
21. Thomasson, A.L. 2007. Artifacts and human concepts, in Laurence, S. and Margolis, E. (eds), Creations of the Mind: Essays on Artifacts and Their Representations, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
22. Vermaas, P.E. and Houkes, W.N. 2006. Technical functions: A drawbridge between the intentional and structural natures of technical artefacts, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 37, no. 1, 5-18.
23. Winner, L. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor; a Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, Chicago, Chicago University Press.