Reading between the lines: Linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 5-8

  Toma, Catalina L ^a   Hancock, Jeffrey T ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Deception; Linguistic cues to deception; Online dating; Social networking sites

Indexed keywords

AFFORDANCES; ASYNCHRONICITY; LINGUISTIC APPROACH; ONLINE DATING; SELF-REFERENCES; SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES; TEXT ANALYSIS;

GROUPWARE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LINGUISTICS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 77950909771     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1718918.1718921     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K. & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
2. Hancock, J.T., Curry, L.E., Goorha, S., & Woodworth, M. (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 45, 1-23.
3. Newman, M.L., Pennebaker, J.W., Berry, D.S. & Richards, J.M. (2003) Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665-675. (Pubitemid 36532851)
4. Pennebaker, J.W., Chung, C.K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R.J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Austin, TX, LIWC.Net.
5. Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023-1036.
6. Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-2557.
7. Whitty, M. T., & Joinson, A. (2009). Truth, lies and trust on the Internet. New York: Psychology Press.