Understanding the key factors for enzymatic conversion of pretreated lignocellulose by partial least square analysis

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 384-392

  Huang, Renliang ^a   Su, Rongxin ^a   Qi, Wei ^a   He, Zhimin ^a  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Cellulase; Cellulose conversion; Lignocellulose; Partial least squares; Pretreatment

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE CONVERSION; CELLULOSE CRYSTALLINITY; CELLULOSE DIGESTION; ENZYMATIC CONVERSIONS; ENZYME DIGESTION; INTERIOR SURFACES; INTRAMOLECULAR HYDROGEN BOND; KEY FACTORS; LIGNOCELLULOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSIC SUBSTRATES; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE ANALYSIS; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; PRE-TREATMENT; PRE-TREATMENTS; REPORTER MOLECULES; SOLUTE EXCLUSION;

BIOFUELS; BIOMATERIALS; CELLULOSE; DELIGNIFICATION; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; HYDROGEN; LIGNIN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RESONANCE; X RAY DIFFRACTION; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS;

HYDROGEN BONDS;

CELLULASE; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROLYSIS; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MAIZE; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PARTICLE SIZE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

CELLULASES; HYDROGEN BONDING; HYDROLYSIS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LIGNIN; MODELS, CHEMICAL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PARTICLE SIZE; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; X-RAY DIFFRACTION; ZEA MAYS;

CELLULASE; DELIGNIFICATION; ENZYMOLYSIS; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN BONDS; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; LIGNOCELLULOSE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PARTICLE SIZE; PRETREATMENT; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 77950908335     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.324     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ Jr, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, Mielenz JR, Murphy R, Templer R, Tschaplinski T. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science. 2006; 311: 484-489.
2. Zhang YHP, Ding SY, Mielenz JR, Cui JB, Elander RT, Laser M, Himmel ME, McMillan JR, Lynd LR. Fractionating recalcitrant lignocellulose at modest reaction conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007; 97: 214-223.
3. Saha BC, Cotta MA. Ethanol production from alkaline peroxide pretreated enzymatically saccharified wheat straw. Biotechnol Prog. 2006; 22: 449-453.
4. Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY. Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol. 2005; 96: 1959-1966.
5. Alriksson B, Rose SH, van Zyl WH, Sjode A, Nilvebrant NO, Jonsson LJ. Cellulase production from spent lignocellulose hydrolysates by recombinant Aspergillus niger. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75: 2366-2374.
6. Kim S, Holtzapple MT. Lime pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol. 2005; 96: 1994-2006.
7. Zheng YZ, Lin HM, Tsao GT. Pretreatment for cellulose hydrolysis by carbon dioxide explosion. Biotechnol Prog. 1998; 14: 890-896.
8. Kim TH, Kim JS, Sunwoo C, Lee YY. Pretreatment of corn stover by aqueous ammonia. Bioresour Technol. 2003; 90: 39-47.
9. Mansfield SD, Mooney C, Saddler JN. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog. 1999; 15: 804-816.
10. Chandra RP, Bura R, Mabee WE, Berlin A, Pan X, Saddler JN. Substrate pretreatment: the key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics? Biofuels. 2007: 67-93.
11. Jeoh T, Ishizawa CI, Davis MF, Himmel ME, Adney WS, Johnson DK. Cellulase digestibility of pretreated biomass is limited by cellulose accessibility. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007; 98: 112-122.
12. Chandra R, Ewanick S, Hsieh C, Saddler JN. The characterization of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates prior to enzymatic hydrolysis. Part 1: a modified Simons' staining technique. Biotechnol Prog. 2008; 24: 1178-1185.
13. Mooney CA, Mansfield SD, Touhy MG, Saddler JN. The effect of initial pore volume and lignin content on the enzymatic hydrolysis of softwoods. Bioresour Technol. 1998; 64: 113-119.
14. Sewalt VJH, Glasser WG, Beauchemin KA. Lignin impact on fiber degradation. 3. Reversal of inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by chemical modification of lignin and by additives. J Agric Food Chem. 1997; 45: 1823-1828.
15. Grethlein HE, Allen DC, Converse AO. A comparative study of the enzymatic hydrolysis of acid-pretreated white pine and mixed hardwood. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1984; 26: 1498-1505.
16. Wong KKY, Deverell KF, Mackie KL, Clark TA, Donaldson LA. The relationship between fiber-porosity and cellulose digestibility in steam-exploded Pinus radiata. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988; 31: 447-456.
17. Stone JF, Scallan AM, Donefer E, Ahlgren E. Digestibility as a simple function of a molecular of similar size to a cellulase enzyme. Adv Chem Ser. 1969; 95: 219-241.
18. Grethlein HE, Converse AO. Common aspects of acid prehydrolysis and steam explosion for pretreating wood. Bioresour Technol. 1991; 36: 77-82.
19. Neuman RP, Walker LP. Solute exclusion from cellulose in packed columns: experimental investigation and pore volume measurements. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1992; 40: 218-225.
20. Yang B, Wyman CE. Effect of xylan and lignin removal by batch and flowthrough pretreatment on the enzymatic digestibility of corn stover cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004; 86: 88-98.
21. Converse AO, Ooshima H, Burns DS. Kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials based on surface area of cellulose accessible to enzyme and enzyme adsorption on lignin and cellulose. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1990; 24/25: 67-73.
22. Grethlein HE. The effect of pore size distribution on the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substrates. Biotechnology 1985; 3: 155-160.
23. Kamide K, Okajima K, Kowsaka K. Dissolution of natural cellulose into aqueous solution: role of super molecular structure of cellulose. Polym J. 1992; 24: 71-86.
24. Kamide K, Okajima K, Kowsaka K, Matsui T. CP/MASS 13CNMR spectra of cellulose solids: an explanation by the intramolecular hydrogen bond concept. Polym J. 1985; 17: 701-706.
25. Oh SY, Yoo DI, Shin Y, Seo G. FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Carbohydr Res. 2005; 340: 417-428.
26. Kamide K, Okajima K, Matsui T, Kowsaka K. Study on the solubility of cellulose in aqueous alkali solution by deuteration IR and 13C NMR. Polym J. 1984; 16: 857-866.
27. US Department of Energy. Breaking the biological barriers to cellulosic ethanol: A joint research agenda. Available at: http://genomicsgtl.energy.gov/biofuels/b2bworkshop.shtml.
28. O'Dwyer JP, Zhu L, Granda CB, Chang VS, Holtzapple MT. Neural network prediction of biomass digestibility based on structural features. Biotechnol Prog. 2008; 24: 283-292.
29. Tenenhaus M, Pagès J, Ambroisine L, Guinot C. PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgements and product characteristics. Food Qual Prefer. 2005; 16: 315-325.
30. Toscas PJ, Shaw FD, Beilken SL. Partial least squares (PLS) regression for the analysis of instrument measurements and sensory meat quality data. Meat Sci. 1999; 52: 173-178.
31. Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2001; 58: 109-130.
32. Jørgensen K, Næs T. The use of LS-PLS for improved understanding, monitoring and prediction of cheese processing. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2008; 93: 11-19.
33. Ibbett RN, Kaenthong S, Phillips DAS, Wilding MA. Solute adsorption and exclusion studies of the structure of never-dried and re-wetted cellulosic fibres. J Mater Sci. 2007; 42: 6809-6818.
34. Changquan S. True density of microcrystalline cellulose. J Pharm Sci. 2005; 94: 2132-2134.
35. Sánchez CG, Alvarez LAE. Micromechanics of lignin/polypropylene composites suitable for industrial applications. Macromol Mater Eng. 1999; 272: 65-70.
36. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the x-ray diffractometer. Text Res J. 1959; 29: 786-794.
37. Weimer PJ, Weston WM. Relationship between the fine structure of native cellulose and cellulose degradability by the cellulase complexes of Trichoderma reesei and Clostridium thermocellum. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1985; 27: 1540-1547.
38. Grous WR, Converse AO, Grethlein HE. Effect of steam explosion pretreatment on pore size and enzymatic hydrolysis of poplar. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1986; 8: 274-280.
39. Colom X, Carrillo F. Crystallinity changes in lyocell and viscose-type fibres by caustic treatment. Eur Polym J. 2002; 38: 2225-2230.
40. Rivers DB, Emert GH. Factors affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of municipal-solid-waste components. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988; 31: 278-281.
41. Sinitsyn AP, Gusakov AV, Vlasenko EY. Effect of structural and physico-chemical features of cellulosic substrates on the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1991; 30: 43-59.
42. Laivins GV, Scallan AM. The influence of drying and beating on the swelling of fines. J Pulp Pap Sci. 1996; 22: J178-J184
43. Fan LT, Lee YH, Beardmore DH. Mechanism of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: effects of major structural features of cellulose on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1980; 22: 177-199.