Modeling with a view to target identification in metabolic engineering: A critical evaluation of the available tools

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 313-331

  Maertens, Jo ^a   Vanrolleghem, Peter A ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dynamic metabolic modeling; Metabolic engineering; Multivariate statistics; Stoichiometric modeling; Stoichiometric network analysis; Target identification

Indexed keywords

METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLIC MODELING; MULTIVARIATE STATISTICS; NETWORK ANALYSIS; TARGET IDENTIFICATION;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; OPTIMIZATION; TARGETS;

MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; METABOLISM; METABOLOMICS; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; METABOLOMICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 77950900814     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.349     Document Type: Review

References (168)

1. Ui S, Mimura A, Ohkuma M, Kudo T. Formation of a chiral acetoinic compound from diacetyl by Escherichia coli expressing meso-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1999; 28: 457-460.
2. Cameron DC, Cooney CL. A novel fermentation: the production of R(-)-1,2-propanediol and acetol by Clostridium thermosaccharolyticum. Bio/Technology. 1986; 4: 651-654.
3. Takiguchi Y, Mishima H, Okuda M, Terao M, Aoki A, Fukuda R. Milbemycins, a new family of macrolide antibiotics: fermentation, isolation and physico-chemical properties. J Antibiot. 1980; 33: 1120-1127.
4. De Mey M, Lequeux G, Maertens J, De Maeseneire S, Soetaert W, Vandamme E. Comparison of DNA and RNA quantification methods suitable for parameter estimation in metabolic modeling of microorganisms. Anal Biochem. 2006; 352: 198-203.
5. Hirai MY, Yano M, Goodenowe DB, Kanaya S, Kimura T, Awazuhara M, Arita M, Fujiwara T, Saito K. Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics for understanding of global responses to nutritional stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101: 10205-12012.
6. Kell DB. Metabolomics and systems biology: making sense of the soup. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004; 7: 296-307.
7. Palsson BO. In silico biology through omics. Nature Biotechnol. 2002; 20: 649-650.
8. Kromer JO, Wittman C, Schroder H, Heinzle E. Metabolic pathway analysis for rational design of L-methionine production by Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metab Eng. 2006; 8: 353-369.
9. Lee SY, Homg SH, Moon SY. In silico metabolic pathway analysis and design: succinic acid production by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli as an example. Genome Inform. 2002; 13: 214-223.
10. Raman K, Rajagopalan P, Chandra N. Flux balance analysis of mycolic acid pathway: targets for anti-tubercular drugs. PLOS Comput Biol. 2005; 1: e46.
11. Patil KR, Rocha I, Forster J, Nielsen J. Evolutionary programming as a platform for in silico metabolic engineering. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6: 308.
12. Alper H, Jin YS, Moxley JF, Stephanopoulos G. Identifying gene targets for the metabolic engineering of lycopene biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng. 2005; 7: 155-164.
13. Lee KH, Park JH, Kim TY, Kim HU, Lee SY. Systems metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for L-threonine production. Mol Syst Biol. 2007; 3: 149.
14. Park JH, Lee KH, Kim TY, Lee SY. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of L-valine based on transcriptome and in silico gene knockout simulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104: 7797-7802.
15. Cox SJ, Shalel LS, Sanchez AM, Lin H, Peercy B, Bennet GN, San KY. Development of a metabolic network design and optimization framework incorporating implement constraints: a succinate production case study. Metab Eng. 2006; 8: 46-57.
16. van Luijk N, Rochat K, Muilwijk B, van der Werff-van der Vat B, Bijlsma S, Coulier L, Jellema R, Hankemeier T, van der Werf MJ. Strain inprovement with seven-league boots: application of metabolomics to improve phenylalanine production by Escherichia coli. 2008. Availavle at: www.tno.nl/downloads/KvL_FBI_Poster_democoli_metabolomics.pdf.
17. van der Werf MJ. TNO: microbial biotechnology, 2008. Available at: www.tno.nl/downloads\%5CMicrobial\%20Production\%20Proceses1.pdf, www.tno.nl/downloads\%5CMicrobial\%20Production\%20Proceses1.pdf.
18. Cánovas M, Bernal V, Sevilla A, Iborra JL. Role of wet experiment design in data generation: from in vivo to in silico and back. In Silico Biol. 2007; 7: S3-S16.
19. Sevilla A, Schmid JW, Mauch K, Iborra JL, Reuss M, Cánovas. Model of central and trimethylammonium metabolism for optimizing L-carnitine production by E. coli. Metab Eng. 2005; 7: 401-425.
20. van Gulik WM, de Laat WT, Vinke JL, Heijnen JJ. Application of metabolic flux analysis for the identification of metabolic bottlenecks in the biosynthesis of penicillin-G. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000; 68: 602-618.
21. Rizzi M, Baltes M, Theobald U, Reuss M. In vivo analysis of metabolic dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: II. Mathematical model. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997; 55: 592-608.
22. De Mey M, Maertens J, Lequeux GJ, Soetaert WK, Vandamme EJ. Construction and model-based analysis of a promoter library for E. coli: an indispensable tool for metabolic engineering. BMC Biotechnol. 2007; 7: 34.
23. Jonsson J, Norberg T, Carlsson L, Gustafsson C, Wold S. Quantative sequence-activity models (QSAM)-tools for sequence design. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993; 21: 733-739.
24. van der Werf MJ, Jellema RH, Hankemeier T. Microbial metabolomics: replacing trial-and-error by the unbiased selection and ranking of targets. J Ind Microbiol Biot. 2005; 32: 234-252.
25. Patil KR, Nielsen J. Uncovering transcriptional regulation of metabolism by using metabolic network topology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102: 2685-2689.
26. Hammer K, Mijakovic I, Jensen PR. Synthetic promoter libraries - tuning of gene expression. Trends Biotechnol. 2006; 24: 53-55.
27. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000; 97: 6640-6645.
28. Garoff H. Using recombinant DNA techniques to study protein targeting in the eucaryotic cell. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985; 1: 403-445.
29. Hieter P, Boguski M. Functional genomics: it's all how you read it. Science. 1997; 278: 601-602.
30. Bailey JE, Sburlati AR, Hatzimanikatis V, Lee K, Renner WA, Tsai PA. Inverse metabolic engineering: a strategy for directed genetic engineering of useful phenotypes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996; 52: 109-121.
31. Schuster S, Fell DA, Dandekar T. A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks. Nature Biotechnol. 2000; 18: 326-332.
32. Papin JA, Price ND, Palsson BO. Extreme pathway lengths and reaction participation in genome-scale metabolic networks. Genome Res. 2002; 12: 1889-1900.
33. Ramakrishna R, Edwards JS, McCulloch A, Palsson BO. Flux-balance analysis of mitochondrial energy metabolism: consequences of system stoichiometric constraints. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001; 280: 695-704.
34. Schuetz R, Kuepfer L, Sauer U. Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol. 2007; 3: 119.
35. Beard DA, Liang S-D, Qian H. Energy balance for analysis of complex metabolic network. Biophys J. 2002; 83: 79-86.
36. Segre D, Vitkup D, Church GM. Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99: 15112-15117.
37. Shlomi T, Berkman O, Ruppin E. Regulatory on/off minimization of metabolic flux changes after genetic perturbations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102: 7695-7700.
38. Schmidt K, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. Quantitative analysis of metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli using two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy and complete isotopomer models. J Biotechnol. 1999; 71: 175-190.
39. Wiechert W, Mollney M, Isermann N, Wurzel M, de Graaf AA. Bidirectional reaction steps in metabolic networks: III. Explicit solution and analysis of isotopomer labeling systems. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999; 66: 69-85.
40. Antoniewicz MR, Kelleher JK, Stephanopoulos G. Elementary metabolite units (EMU): A novel framework for modeling isotopomer distributions. Metab Eng. 2007; 9: 68-86.
41. Degenring D, Froemel C, Dikta G, Takors R. Sensitivity analysis for the reduction of complex metabolism models. J Process Control. 2004; 14: 729-745.
42. Wong P, Gladney S, Keasling JD. Mathematical model of the lac operon: inducer exclusion, catabolite repression, and diauxic growth on glucose and lactose. Biotechnol Prog. 1997; 13: 132-143.
43. Peercy BE, Cox SJ, Shalel-Levanon S, San K-Y, Bennet G. A kinetic model of oxygen regulation of cytochrome production in Escherichia coli. J Theor Biol. 2006; 242: 547-563.
44. Kompala DS, Ramkrishna D, Tsao GT. Cybernetic modeling of microbial growth on multiple substrates. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1984; 26: 1272-1281.
45. Young JD. A System-Level Mathematical Description of Metabolic Regulation Combining Aspects of Elementary Flux Mode Analysis with Cybernetic Control Laws. PhD thesis, Purdue University, USA, 2005.
46. Francke C, Siezen RJ, Teusink B. Reconstucting the metabolic network of a bacterium from its genome. Trends Microbiol. 2005; 13: 550-558.
47. DeJongh M, Formsma K, Boillot P, Gould J, Rycenga M, Best A. Towards the automated genetaion of genome-scale metabolic networkds in the seed. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007; 8: 139.
48. Suthers PF, Dasika MS, Kumar VS, Denisov F, Glass JI, Maranas CD. A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of Mycoplasma genitalium, iPS189. PLOS Comput Biol. 2009; 5: 1-14.
49. Keseler IM, Collado-Vides J, Gama-Castro S, Ingraham J, Paley S, Paulsen IT, Peralta-Gil M, Karp PD. EcoCyc: a comprehensive database resource for Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33: D334-D337.
50. Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, Kanehisa M. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 27: 29-34.
51. Schomburg I, Hofmann O, Bansch C, Chang A, Schomburg D. Enzyme data and metabolic information: BRENDA, a resource for research in biology, biochemistry, and medicine. Gene Funct Dis. 2000; 3-4: 109-118.
52. Reed JL, Vo TD, Schilling CH, Palsson BO. An expanded genome-scale model of Escherichia coli K-12. Genome Biol. 2003; 4: 54.
53. Stephanopoulos GN, Aristidou AA, Nielsen J. Metabolic Engineering. New York: Academic Press, 1998.
54. van der Werf MJ. Towards replacing closed with open target selection strategies. Trends Biotechnol. 2005; 23: 11-16.
55. Papin JA, Stelling J, Price ND, Klamt S, Schuster S, Palsson BO. Comparison of network-based pathway analysis methods. Trends Biotechnol. 2004; 22: 400-405.
56. Schilling CH, Letscher D, Palsson BO. Theory of the systemic definition of metabolic pathways and their use in interpreting metabolic function from a pathway-oriented perspective. J Theor Biol. 2000; 203: 229-248.
57. Carlson R, Fell D, Scrienc F. Metabolic pathway analysis of a recombinant yeast for rational strain development. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002; 79: 121-134.
58. Carlson R, Scrienc F. Fundamental Escherichia coli biochemical pathways for biomass and energy production: creation of overall fluxes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003; 86: 149-162.
59. Nookaew I, Meechai A, Thammarongtham, C, Laoteng K, Ruanglek V, Cheevadhanarak S, Nielsen J, Bhumiratana S. Identification of flux regulation coefficients from elementary flux modes: a systems biology tool for analysis of metabolic networks. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007; 97: 1535-1549.
60. Schwarts JM, Gauguin C, Nacher J, de Daruvar A, Kanehisa M. Observing metabolic functions at the genome scale. Genome Biol. 2007; 8: R123.
61. Lequeux G, Johansson L, Maertens J, Vanrolleghem PA, Lidén G. MFA for overdetermined systems reviewed and compared with RNA expression data to elucidate the difference in shikimate yield between carbon- and phosphate-limited continuous cultures of E. coli W3110. shik1. Biotechnol Prog. 2006; 22: 1056-1070.
62. von Kamp A, Schuster S. Metatool 5.0: fast and flexible elementary modes analysis. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22: 1930-1931.
63. Wiback SJ, Palsson BO. Extreme pathway analysis of human red blood cell metabolism. Biophys J. 2002; 83: 808-818.
64. Terzer M, Stelling J. Large-scale computation of elementary flux modes with bit pattern trees. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24: 2229-2235.
65. van der Heijden RTJM, Romein B, Heijnen JJ, Hellinga C, Luyben KCAM. Linear constraint relations in biochemical reaction systems: II. Diagnosis and estimation of gross errors. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994; 43: 11-20.
66. Forster J, Famili I, Fu P, Palsson BO, Nielsen J. Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res. 2003; 13: 244-253.
67. Schilling CH, Covert MW, Famili I, Church GM, Edwards JS, Palsson BO. Genome-scale metabolic model of Helicobacter pylori 26695. J Bacteriol. 2002; 184: 4582-4593.
68. Baart GJE, Zomer B, de Haan A, van der Pol LA, Beuvery C, Tramper J, Martens DE. Modeling Neisseria meningitidis metabolism: from genome to metabolic fluxes. Genome Biol. 2007; 8: R316.
69. Henry CS, Broadbelt LJ, Hatzimanikatis V. Thermodynamics-based metabolic flux analysis. Biophys J. 2007; 92: 1792-1805.
70. Kummel A, Panke S, Heineman M. Putative regulatory sites unraveled by network-embedded thermodynamic analysis of metabolome data. Mol Syst Biol. 2006; 2: 2006-2034.
71. Dauner M, Bailey JE, Sauer U. Metabolic flux analysis with a comprehensive isotopomer model in Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001; 76: 144-156.
72. van Winden WA, van Dam JC, Ras C, Kleijn RJ, Vinke JL, van Gulik WM, Heijnen JJ. Metabolic-flux analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN. PK113-7D based on mass isotopomer measurements of 13C-labeled primary metabolites. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005; 5: 559-568.
73. Akesson M, Forster J, Nielsen J. Integration of gene expression data into genome-scale metabolic models. Metab Eng. 2004; 6: 285-293.
74. Cakir T, Kirdar B, Onsan ZI, Ulgen KO, Nielsen J. Effect of carbon source perturbations on transcriptional regulation of metabolic fluxes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Syst Biol. 2007; 1: 18.
75. Shlomi T, Eisenberg Y, Sharan R, Ruppin E. A genome-scale computational study of the interplay between transcriptional regulation and metabolism. Mol Syst Biol. 2007; 3: 101.
76. Edwards JS, Palsson B. The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: its definition, characteristics, and capabilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000; 97: 5528-5533.
77. Oliveira AP, Nielsen J, Forster J. Modeling Lactococcus lactis using a genome-scale flux model. BMC Microbiol. 2005; 5: 39.
78. Knorr AL, Jain R, Srivastava R. Bayesian-based selection of metabolic objective functions. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23: 351-357.
79. Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J. 1965; 7: 308-313.
80. Srinivas M, Patnaik LM. Genetic algorithms: a survey. Computer. 1994; 27: 17-26.
81. Kvasnicka V, Pospichal J. A hybrid of simplex method and simulated annealing. Chemom Intell Lab. 1997; 39: 161-173.
82. Burgard AP, Pharkya P, Maranas CD. Optknock: a bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003; 30: 887-899.
83. Gombert AK, Nielsen J. Mathematical modeling of metabolism. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2000; 11: 180-186.
84. Koffas M, del Cardayre S. Evolutionary metabolic engineering. Metab Eng. 2005; 7: 1-3.
85. Schmidt K, Marx A, de Graaf AA, Wiechert W, Sahm H, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. 13C tracer experiments and metabolite balancing for metabolite flux analysis: Comparing two approaches. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998; 58: 254-257.
86. Wittmann C, Heinzle E. Application of MALDI-TOF MS to lysine-producing Corynebacterium glutamicum a novel approach for metabolic flux analysis. Eur J Biochem. 2001; 268: 2441-2455.
87. Fong SS, Joyce AR, Palsson BO. Parallel adaptive evolution cultures of Escherichia coli lead to convergent growth phenotypes with different gene expression states. Genome Res. 2005; 15: 1365-1372.
88. Covert MW, Palsson BO. Constraints-based models: regulation of gene expression reduces the steady state solution space. J Theor Biol. 2003; 221: 309-325.
89. Covert MW, Palsson BO. Transcriptional regulation in constraints-based metabolic models of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 28058-28064.
90. Nagrath D, Avila-Elchiver M, Berthiaume F, Tilles AW, Messac A, Yarmush ML. Integrated energy and flux balance based multiobjective framework for large-scale metabolic networks. Ann Biomed Eng. 2007; 35: 863-885.
91. De Noronha Pissarr P, Nielsen J. Thermodynamics of metabolic pathways for penicillin production: analysis of thermodynamic feasibility and free energy charges during fed-batch cultivation. Biotechnol Prog. 1997; 13: 156-165.
92. Lee JM, Gianchandani EP, Papin JA. Flux balance analysis in the era of metabolomics. Brief Bioinformactics. 2006; 7: 140-150.
93. Mahadevan R, Edwards JS, Doyle FJ. Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. Biophys J. 2002; 83: 1331-1340.
94. Lee JM, Gianchandani EP, Eddy JA, papin JA. Dynamic analysis of integrated signaling, metabolic, and regulatory networks. PLOS Comput Biol. 2008; 4: 1-20.
95. Schmidt K, Carlsen M, Nielsen J, Villadsen J. Modeling isotopomer distributions in biochemical networks using isotopomer mapping matrices. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997; 1997: 831-840.
96. Grotkjaer T, Cristakopoulos P, Nielsen J, Olsson L. Comparative metabolic network analysis of two xylose fermenting recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Metab Eng. 2005; 7: 437-444.
97. Kleijn RJ, Geertman J-MA, Nfor BK, Ras C, Schipper D, Pronk JT, Heijnen JJ, Maris AJ, van Winden WA. Metabolic flux analysis of a glycerol-overproducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain based on GC-MS, LC-MS and NMR-derived 13C-labeling data. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007; 7: 216-231.
98. Van Winden WA, Verheijen PJT, Heijnen JJ. Possible pitfalls of flux calculations based on 13C labeling. Metab Eng. 2001: 3: 151-162.
99. Mollney M, Wiechert W, Kownatzki D, De Graaf AA. Bidirectional reaction steps in metabolic networks: IV. Optimal design of isotopomer labeling experiments. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999; 66: 86-103.
100. Zamboni N, Fischer E, Sauer U. FiatFlux - a software for metabolic flux analysis from 13C-glucose experiments. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6: 209.
101. Quek L-E, Wittmann C, Nielsen LK, Kromer JO. OpenFLUX: efficient modeling software for 13C-based metabolic flux analysis. Microb Cell Fact. 2009; 8: 25.
102. Nanchen A, Schicker A, Sauer U. Nonlinear dependency of intracellular fluxes on growth rate in miniaturized continuous cultures of Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microb. 2006; 72: 1164-1172.
103. Grotkjaer T, Akesson M, Christensen B, Gombert AK, Nielsen J. Impact of transamination reactions and protein turnover on labeling dynamics in 13C-labeling experiments. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004; 86: 209-216.
104. Noh K, Wahl A, Wiechert W. Computational tools for isotopically instationary 13C labeling experiments under metabolic steady state conditions. Metab Eng. 2006; 8: 554-577.
105. Wahl SA, Noh K, Wiechert W. 13C labeling experiments at metabolic nonstationary conditions: An exploratory study. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9: 152.
106. Zhao Z, Kuijvenhoven K, Ras C, van Gulik WM, Heijnen JJ, Verheijen PJT, van Winden WA. Isotopic non-stationary 13C gluconate tracer method for accurate determination of the pentose phosphate pathway split-ratio in Penicilium chrysogenum. Metab Eng. 2008; 10: 178-186.
107. Chassagnole C, Noisommit-Rizzi N, Schmid JW, Mauch K, Reuss M. Dynamic modeling of the central carbon metabolism of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002; 79: 53-73.
108. Vaseghi S, Baumeister A, Rizzi M, Reuss M. In vivo dynamics of the pentose phosphate pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 1999; 1: 128-140.
109. Savageau MA. Biochemical System Analysis, 1st ed. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1976.
110. Hatzimanikatis V, Bailey JE. MCA has more to say. J Theor Biol. 1996; 182: 233-242.
111. Hatzimanikatis V, Bailey JE. Effects of spatiotemporal variations on metabolic control: approximative analysis using (log) linear kinetic models. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997; 54: 91-104.
112. Westerhoff HV, Van Dam K. Thermodynamics and Control of Biological Free Energy Transduction. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1987.
113. Heijnen JJ. Approximative kinetic formats used in metabolic network modeling. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005; 91: 534-545.
114. Visser D, Heijnen JJ. Dynamic simulation and metabolic re-design of a branched pathway using lin-log kinetics. Metab Eng. 2003; 5: 164-176.
115. Fell D. Metabolic control analysis: a survey of its theoretical and experimental development. Biochem J. 1992; 286: 313-330.
116. Stephanopoulos G, Simpson T. Flux amplification in complex metabolic networks. Chem Eng Sci. 1997; 52: 2607-2627.
117. Thomas S, Fell DA. The role of multiple enzyme activation in metabolic flux control. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1998; 38: 65-85.
118. Lee B, Yen J, Yang L, Liao JC. Incorporating qualitative knowledge in enzyme kinetic models using fuzzy logic. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999; 62: 722-729.
119. Yang YT, Bennet GN, San KY. Genetic and metabolic control. Eur J Biotechnol. 1998; 1: 3.
120. Mauch K, Arnold S, Reuss M. Dynamic sensitivity analysis for metabolic systems. Chem Eng Sci. 1997; 52: 2589-2598.
121. Tomita M. Whole-cell simulation: a grand challenge of the 21st century. Trends Biotechnol. 2001; 19: 205-210.
122. Tomita M, Takahashi K, Matsuzaki Y, Saito K, Tanida S, Yugi K, Venter JC, Hutchison CA III. E-cell: software environment for whole-cell simulation. Bioinformatics. 1999; 15: 72-84.
123. Theobald U, Mailinger W, Baltes M, Rizzi M, Reuss M. In vivo analysis of metabolic dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: I. Experimental observations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997; 55: 305-316.
124. Theobald U, Mailinger W, Reuss M, Rizzi M. In vivo analysis of glucose-induced fast changes in yeast adenine nucleotide pool applying a rapid sampling technique. Anal Biochem. 1993; 214: 31-37.
125. Visser D, van Zuylen GA, van Dam JC, Eman MR, Proll A, Ras C, Wu L, van Gulik WM, Heijnen JJ. Analysis of in vivo kinetics of glycolysis in aerobic Saccharomyces cerevisiae by application of glucose and ethanol pulses. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004; 88: 157-167.
126. Gao J, Gorenflo VM, Scharer JM, Budman HM. Dynamic metabolic modeling for a MAB bioprocess. Biotechnol Prog. 2007; 23: 168-181.
127. Kresnowati MTAP, van Winden WA, Almering MJH, ten Pierick A, Ras C, Knijnenburg TA, Daran-Lapujade P, Pronk JT, Heijnen JJ, Daran JM. When transcriptome meets metabolome: fast cellular responses of yeast to sudden relief of glucose limitation. Mol Syst Biol. 2006; 2: 49.
128. Mashego MR, van Gulik WM, Heijnen JJ. Metabolome dynamic responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to simultaneous rapid perturbations in external electron acceptor and electron donor. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007; 7: 48-66.
129. Voit EO, Alvarez-Vasquez F, Sims KJ. Analysis of dynamic labeling data. Math Biosci. 2004; 191: 83-99.
130. Maranas CD. Computational analysis and redesign of biological networks. In IECA 2006, Jeju Island; 2006.
131. Dunn WB, Bailey NJC, Johnson HE. Measuring the metabolome: current analytical technologies. Analyst. 2005; 130: 606-625.
132. Mashego MR, Rumbold K, De Mey M, Vandamme E, Soetaert W, Heijnen JJ. Microbial metabolomics: past, present and future methodologies. Biotechnol Lett. 2007; 29: 1-11.
133. Oldiges M, Lutz S, Pflug S, Schroer K, Stein N, Wiendahl C. Metabolomics: current state and evolving methodologies and tools. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007; 76: 495-511.
134. Villas-Boas SG, Bruheim P. Cold glycerol-saline: the promising quenching solution for accurate intracellular metabolite analysis of microbial cells. Anal Biochem. 2007; 370: 87-97.
135. Benevolensky SV, Clifton D, Fraenkel DG. The effect of increased PGI on glucose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In situ study of the glycolytic pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 4878-4882.
136. Teusink B, Passarge J, Reijenga CA, Esgalhado E, van der Weijden CC, Schepper M, Walsh MC, Bakker BM, van Dam K, Westerhoff HV, Snoep JL. Can yeast glycolysis be understood in terms of in vitro kinetics of the constituent enzymes? Testing biochemistry. Eur J Biochem. 2000; 267: 5313-5329.
137. Bucholz A, Takors R, Wandrey C. Quantification of intracellular metabolites in Escherichia coli K12 using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric techniques. Anal Biochem. 2001; 295: 129-137.
138. Schaefer U, Boos W, Takors R, Weuster-Botz D. Automated sampling device for monitoring intracellular metabolite dynamics. Anal Biochem. 1999; 270: 88-96.
139. Abdel-Hamid AM, Attwood MM, Guest JR. Pyruvate oxidase contributes to the aerobic growth efficiency of Escherichia coli. Microbiology. 2001; 147: 1483-1498.
140. Li M, Yao S, Shimizu K. Effect of poxB gene knockout on metabolism in Escherichia coli based on growth characteristics and enzyme activities. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007; 23: 573-580.
141. Canonaco F, Hess TA, Heri S, Wang T, Szyperski T, Sauer U. Metabolic flux response to phosphoglucose isomerase knock-out in Escherichia coli and impact of overexpression of the soluble transhydrogenase UdhA. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001; 104: 247-252.
142. Lerondel G, Doan T, Zamboni N, Sauer U, Ayermich S. YtsJ has the major physiological role of the four paralogous malic enzyme isoforms in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2006; 188: 4727-4736.
143. Sauer U, Eikmanns BJ. The PEP-pyruvate-oxaloacetate node as the switch point for carbon flux distribution in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005; 29: 765-794.
144. Kacser H, Burns JA. The control of flux. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1973; 27: 65-104.
145. Beven K. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. J Hydrol. 2006; 320: 18-36.
146. Mashego MR, Jansen MLA, Vinke JL, van Gulik WM, Heijnen JJ. Changes in the metabolome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae associated with evolution in aerobic glucose-limited chemostats. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005; 5: 419-430.
147. Patnaik PR. Are microbes intelligent beings? An assessment of cybernetic modeling. Biotechnol Adv. 2000; 18: 267-288.
148. Varner J, Ramkrishna D. Metabolic engineering from a cybernetic perspective. 1. Theoretical preliminaries. Biotechnol Progr. 1999; 15: 407-425.
149. Varner J, Ramkrishna D. Metabolic engineering from a cybernetic perspective: aspartate family of amino acids. Metab Eng. 1999; 1: 88-116.
150. Baloo S, Ramkrishna D. Metabolic regulation in bacterial cultures: I. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1991; 38: 1337-1352.
151. Baloo S, Ramkrishna D. Metabolic regulation in bacterial cultures: II. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1991; 38: 1353-1362.
152. Turner BG, Ramkrishna D, Jansen NB. Cybernetic modeling of bacterial cultures at low gowth rates: single-substrate systems. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1989; 1989: 252-161.
153. Varner J, Ramkrishna D. Application of cybernetic models to metabolic engineering: investigation of storage pathways. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998; 58: 282-291.
154. Ramakrishna R, Ramkrishna D, Konopka AE. Cybernetic modeling of growth in mixed, substitutable substrate environments: preferential and simultaneous utilization. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996; 52: 141-151.
155. Straight JV, Ramkrishna D. Cybernetic modeling and regulation of metabolic pathways. growth on complementary nutrients. Biotechnol Prog. 1994; 10: 574-587.
156. Zak SH. Systems and Control. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
157. Stelling J, Klamt S, Bettenbrock K, Schuster S, Gilles ED. Metabolic network structure determines key aspects of functionality and regulation. Nature. 2002; 420: 190-193.
158. Namjoshi A, Kienle A, Ramkrishna D. Steady-state multiplicity in bioreactors: bifurcation analysis of cybernetic models. Chem Eng Sci. 2003; 58: 793-800.
159. Narang A, Konopka A, Ramkrishna D. New patterns of mixed-substrate utilization during batch growth of Escherichia coli K12. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997; 55: 747-757.
160. Wold S, Sjostrom M, Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool for chemometrics. Chemom Intell Lab. 2001; 58: 109-130.
161. Wold S, Trygg J, Berglund A, Antti H. Some recent developments in PLS modeling. Chemom Intell Lab. 2001; 58: 131-150.
162. Li R, Meng G, Gao N, Xie H. Combined use of partial least-squares regression and neural network for residual life estimation of large generator stator insulation. Meas Sci Technol. 2007; 18: 2074-2082.
163. van den Berg RA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, van der Werf MJ. Centering, scaling and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics. 2006; 7: 142.
164. Teppola S, Mujunen SP, Minkkinen P. Partial least squares modeling of an activated sludge plant: a case study. Chemom Intell Lab. 1997; 38: 197-208.
165. Martens H, Martens M. Modified jack-knife estimation of parameter uncertainty in bilinear modeling by partial least squares regression (PLSR). Food Qual Prefer. 2000; 11: 5-16.
166. Lopes JA, Costa PF, Alves TP, Menezes JC. Chemometrics in bioprocess engineering: process analytical technology (PAT) applications. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2004; 72: 269-275.
167. Lee DS, Vanrolleghem PA, Park JM. Parallel hybrid modeling methods for a full-scale cokes wastewater treatment plant. J Biotechnol. 2005; 115: 317-328.
168. Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, Bolouri H, Doyle JC, Kitano H, Arkin AP, Bornstein BJ, Bray D, Cornish-Bowden A, Cuellar AA, Dronov S, Gilles ED, Ginkel M, Gor V, Goryanin II, Hedley WJ, Hodgman TC, Hofmeyr JH, Hunter PJ, Juty NS, Kasberger JL, Kremling A, Kummer U, Le Novere N, Loew LM, Lucio D, Mendes P, Minch E, Mjolsness ED, Nakayama Y, Nelson MR, Nielsen PF, Sakurada T, Schaff JC, Shapiro BE, Shimizu TS, Spence HD, Stelling J, Takahashi K, Tomita M, Wagner J, Wang J. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19: 524-531.