An empirical investigation of the Paramount antitrust case

Applied Economics

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 171-183

  Gil, Ricard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FILM; PRODUCTION SYSTEM;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 77950891207     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: 14664283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840701604404     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Blass, A. A. and Carlton, D. W. (2001) The choice of organizational form in gasoline retailing and the cost of laws that limit that choice, Journal of Law and Economics, 44-, 511-24.
2. Chisholm, D. (1993) Asset specificity and long-term contracts: the case of the motion-pictures industry, Eastern Economic Journal, 19, 143-55.
3. Corts, K. S. (2001) The strategic effects of vertical market structure: common agency and divisionalization in the US motion picture industry, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 509-52.
4. DeLorme, C., Frame, W. and Kamerschen, D. (1996) Special-interest-group perspective before and after the Clayton and federal trade commission acts, Applied Economics, 28, 773-7.
5. De Vany, A. and Eckert, R. (1991) Motion picture antitrust: the paramount cases revisited, Research in Law and Economics, 14, 51-112.
6. De Vany, A. and McMillan, H. (2004) Was the antitrust action that broke up the studios good for the movies? evidence from the stock market, American Law and Economics Review, 6, 135-52.
7. De Vany, A. (2004) Hollywood Economics: How Extreme Uncertainty Shapes the Film Industry, Routledge, New York.
8. Feinberg, R. (1984) The timing of antitrust effects on pricing, Applied Economics, 16, 397-409.
9. Fu, W. W. (2004) Vertical integration, movie foreclosure and exhibitors' screening behavior in the Singapore cinema market, Working Paper, Nanyang Technological University.
10. Gil, R. (2004) Contracting in the Spanish movie industry, Ph.D. Dissertation, Economics Department, University of Chicago.
11. Gilbert, R. and Hastings, J. (2001) Vertical integration in Gasoline supply: an empirical test of raising rivals' costs, Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley
12. Hart, O. and Tirole, J. (1990) Vertical integration and market foreclosure, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1990, pp. 205-276 and 285-286.
13. Hastings, J. S. (2004) Vertical relationships and competition in retail Gasoline markets: empirical evidence from contract changes in Southern California, American Economic Review, 94, 317-28.
14. Hollywood Renegades, The Hollywood Antitrust Case: The Paramount Antitrust Case, http://www.cobbles.com/simpp_archive/1film_antitrust.htm
15. Joskow, P. (1987) Contract duration and relation-specific investments: empirical evidence from coal markets, American Economic Review, 77, 168-85.
16. Lafontaine, F. (1999) Franchising or corporate ownership: the effect on price dispersion, The Journal of Business Venturing, 14, 17-34.
17. Masten, S. (1984) The organization of production: evidence from the aerospace industry, Journal of Law and Economics, 27, 403-17.
18. Monteverde, K. and Teece, D. (1982) Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry, Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 206-13.
19. Mullainathan, S. and Scharfstein, D. (2001) Do firm boundaries matter?, American Economic Review AEA Papers and Proceedings, 91, 195-99.
20. National Association of Theater Owners (2002) EOE: The 2001-2002 Encyclopedia of Exhibition, The NATO Communications Dept.
21. Shepard, A. (1993) Contractual form, retail price, and asset characteristics in Gasoline retailing, RAND Journal of Economics, 24, 58-77.
22. Smith, S. and Smith, V. (1986) Successful movies: a preliminary empirical analysis, Applied Economics, 18,501-7.
23. Television Digest (1964), Television Factbook Television Digest Inc. Washington.