Data-driven analyses of an fMRI study of a subject experiencing phosphenes

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 821-828

  Missimer, John H ^a   Seitz, Rüdiger J ^b   Kleiser, Raimund ^b,c  

^a PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

^c KEPLER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Austria)

Author keywords

fMRI; Independent component analysis; Phosphenes; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERY; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN INFARCTION; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BRAIN MAPPING; IMAGE PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BRAIN INFARCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); OCCIPITAL LOBE; PHOSPHENES; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 77950891002     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22122     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alexander GE, Moeller JR. Application of the scaled subprofile model to functional imaging in neuropsychiatric disorders: a principal component approach to modeling brain function in disease. Hum Brain Mapp 1994;2:79-94.
2. Biswal BB, Ulmer JL. Blind source separation of multiple signal sources of fMRI data sets using independent component analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:265-271.
3. Friston KJ, Phillips J, Chawla D, Büchel C. Nonlinear PCA: characterizing interactions between modes of brain activity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2000;355:135-146.
4. Quigley MA, Haughton VM, Carew J, et al. Comparison of independent component analysis and conventional hypothesis-driven analysis for clinical functional MR image processing. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:49-58. (Pubitemid 34098260)
5. Svensén M, Kruggel F, Benali H. ICA of fMRI group study data. Neuroimage 2002;16(3 Pt 1):551-563.
6. Tehovnik EJ, Slocum WM, Carvey CE, Schiller PH. Phosphene induction and the generation of saccadic eye movements by striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 2005;93:1-19.
7. Gu H, Engelien W, Feng H, et al. Mapping transient randomly occurring neuropsychological events using independent component analysis. Neuroimage 2001;14:1432-1443. (Pubitemid 33124191)
8. Seitz RJ, Knorr U, Azari NP, Weder B. Cerebral networks in sensorimotor disturbances. Brain Res Bull 2001;54:299-305.
9. McKeown MJ, Makeig S, Brown GG, et al. Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Hum Brain Mapp 1998;6:160-188. (Pubitemid 28247339)
10. Beckmann CF, Smith SM. Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject fMRI analysis. Neuroimage 2005;25:294-311. (Pubitemid 40289157)
11. Esposito F, Formisano E, Seifritz E, et al. Spatial independent component analysis of functional MRI time-series: to what extent do results depend on the algorithm used? Hum Brain Mapp 2002;16:146-157.
12. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. 3-dimensional proportional system. An approach to cerebral imaging. 1998. Stuttgart: Thieme.
13. Andersen AH, Gash DM, Avison MJ. Principal component analysis of the dynamic response measured by fMRI: a generalized linear systems framework. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:795-815.
14. Smith JF, Chen K, Johnson S, et al. Network analysis of single subject fMRI during a finger opposition task. Neuroimage 2006; 32:325-332.
15. Brett M, Johnsruede IS, Owen AM. The problem of functional localisation in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002;3:243-249. (Pubitemid 135706594)
16. Watson JDG. The human visual system. In: Toga AW, Mazziotta JC, editors. Brain mapping - the systems. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. p 263-289.
17. Kaas JH, Lyon DC. Pulvinar contributions to the dorsal and ventral streams of visual processing in primates. Brain Res Rev 2007;55:285-296. (Pubitemid 47538753)
18. Cavanna AE, Trimble MR. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 2006;129(Pt 3): 564-583.
19. Weiss PH, Marshall JC, Wunderlich G, et al. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain 2000;123(Pt 12):2531-2541.
20. Nickel J, Seitz RJ. Functional clusters in the human parietal cortex as revealed by an observer-independent meta-analysis of functional activation studies. Anat Embryol (Berl) 2005;210:463-472. (Pubitemid 41752608)
21. Seghier ML, Vuilleumier P. Functional neuroimaging findings on the human perception of illusory contours. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2006;30:595-612.
22. Wunderlich G, Suchan B, Volkmann J, et al. Visual hallucinations in recovery from cortical blindness: imaging correlates. Arch Neurol 2000;57:561-565. (Pubitemid 30212131)
23. Gilbert SJ, Spengler S, Simons JS, et al. Functional specialization within rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10): a meta-analysis. J Cogn Neurosci 2006;18:932-948. (Pubitemid 44066131)
24. Seitz RJ, Nickel J, Azari NP. Functional modularity of the medial prefrontal cortex: involvement in human empathy. Neuropsychology 2006;20:743-751. (Pubitemid 44747873)