Effect of filler particles on surface roughness of experimental composite series

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 59-67

  Marghalani, Hanadi Yousif ^a  

^a KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Filler size and shape; Resin composites; Roughness parameters; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950881838     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572010000100011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater. 2007;23(1):51-9.
2. Cavalcante LM, Masouras K, Watts DC, Pimenta LA, Silikas N. Effect of nanofillers' size on surface properties after toothbrush abrasion. Am J Dent. 2009;22(1):60-4.
3. Draughn RA, Harrison A. Relationship between abrasive wear and microstructure of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40(2):220-4.
4. Gadelmawla E, Koura M, Maksoud T, Elewa I, Soliman H. Roughness parameters. J Mater Proces Tech. 2002;123:133-45.
5. Jaarda MJ, Wang RF, Lang BR. A regression analysis of filler particle content to predict composite wear. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77(1):57-67.
6. Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(6):642-9.
7. Kirk RE, Othmer DF, editors. Encyclopedia of chemical technology. 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 1991. p. 397
8. Martinelli J, Pires-de-Souza FC, Casemiro LA, Tirapelli C, Panzer H. Abrasion resistance of composites polymerized by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units. Braz Dent J. 2006;17(1):29-33.
9. McCabe JF, Wang Y, Braem M. Surface contact fatigue and flexural fatigue of dental restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;50(3):375-80.
10. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(10):1382-90.
11. Moszner N, Klapdohr S. Nanotechnology for dental composites. Int J Nanotech 2004;1(1-2):130-56.
12. Nowicki B. Multiparameter representation of surface roughness. Wear. 1985;102:161-76.
13. Powers JM, Fan PL. Erosion of composite resins. J Dent Res. 1980;59(5):815-9.
14. Ryba T, Dunn W, Murchison D. Surface roughness of various packable composites. Oper Dent. 2002;27:243-7.
15. Sander M. Fundamentals in the assessment of surface irregularities. In: A practical guide to the assessment of surface texture. GmbH, Gottingen, Germany: Feinprufperthen; 1991. p. 1-23, 55, 375-90.
16. Scheibe KG, Almeida KG, Medeiros IS, Costa JF, Alves CM. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(1):21-6.
17. Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(5):265-73; discussion 74-5.
18. Terry DA. Applications of nanotechnology. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2004;16(3):220-2.
19. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL. Wear and fatigue behavior of nano-structured dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;78(1):196-203.
20. Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials. 2005;26(24):4932-7.
21. Venhoven BA, Gee AJ, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of filler parameters on the mechanical coherence of dental restorative resin composites. Biomaterials. 1996;17(7):735-40.
22. Wennerberg A, Ohlsson R, Rosen BG, Andersson B. Characterizing three-dimensional topography of engineering and biomaterial surfaces by confocal laser scanning and stylus techniques. Med Eng Phys. 1996;18(7):548-56.
23. Xing X S, RKY L. Wear behavior of epoxy matrix composites filled with uniform sized sub-micron spherical silica particles. Wear. 2004;256:21-6.