Social language network analysis

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 23-26

  Scholand, Andrew J ^a   Tausczik, Yla R ^b   Pennebaker, James W ^b  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Content analysis; Group; Network structure; Social language processing; Social network analysis

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION CONTENT; LANGUAGE NETWORKS; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NETWORK ANALYSIS; NETWORK STRUCTURES; POST-PROCESSING STAGES; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

GROUPWARE; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LINGUISTICS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS;

EID: 77950869554     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1718918.1718925     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Baldwin, T.T., Bedell, M.D., and Johnson, J.L., The Social Fabric of a Team-Based M.B.A. Program, Acad. of Management Journal, 40, 6 (1997), pp. 1369-1397.
2. Borgatti, S.P. and Cross, R., A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks, Management Science, 49, 4 (2003), pp. 432-445.
3. Chung, C.K. and Pennebaker, J.W., The psychological function of function words. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication: Frontiers of social psychology, Psychology Press (2007), pp. 343-359.
4. Hansen, M.T., Knowledge Networks, Organization Science, 13, 3 (2002), pp. 232-248.
5. Hossain, L., Wu, A., and Chung, K.K.S, Actor Centrality Correlates to Project Based Coordination, Proc. CSCW'06, ACM Press (2006), pp. 363-372.
6. Ibarra, H. and Andrews, S. B., Power, Social Influence, and Sense Making, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (1993), pp. 277-303.
7. Issacs, E., Walendowski, A., Whittaker, S., Schiano, D.J., and Kamm, C., The Character, Functions, and Styles of Instant Messaging in the Workplace, Proc. CSCW'02, ACM Press (2002), pp. 11- 20.
8. Julsrud, T.E, Core/periphery Structures and Trust in Distributed Work Groups, Structure and Dynamics, 2, 2 (2007) pp. 1-28.
9. Kacewicz, E., Pennebaker, J.W., Davis, M., Jeon, M., and Graesser, A.C. (under review). The language of status hierarchies.
10. Lave, J. and Wagner, E., Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge Press (1994).
11. Milroy, L. and Milroy, J., Social network and social class: towards an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society, 21, 1 (1992), pp. 1-26.
12. Mutton, P., Inferring and Visualizing Social Networks on Internet Relay Chat, IV 2004, (2004), pp. 35-43.
13. Newman, M.L., Pennebaker, J.W., Berry, D.S., and Richards, J.M., Lying words, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (2003), pp. 665-675.
14. Paollilo, J.C., Language variation on Internet Relay Chat: A social network approach, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 2 (2001), pp.180 - 213.
15. Pennebaker, J.W., Mehl, M.R., and Niederhoffer, K., Psychological aspects of natural language use, Annual Review of Psychology, 54 (2003), pp. 547-577.
16. Pentland, A. Honest Signals, MIT Press (2008).
17. Sexton, J.B. and Helmreich, R.L., Analyzing cockpit communications, Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 5, 1 (2000), pp. 63-68.
18. Slatcher, R.B. and Pennebaker, J.W., How do I love thee? Psychological Science, 17 (2006), pp. 660-664.
19. Sparrowe, R.T., Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., and Kraimer, M.L., Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 2 (2001), pp. 316-325.
20. Tichy, N.M., Tushman, M.L., Fombrun, C., Social Network Analysis for Organizations, The Academy of Management Review, 4, 4 (1979), pp. 507-519.
21. Tyler, J., Wilkinson, D., and Huberman, B., Email as Spectroscopy, (2003), http://www.hpl.hp.com/shl/papers/email/index.html
22. Weick, K.E., Sensemaking in organizations, Sage Publications (1997).
23. White, S. and Smyth, P., Algorithms For Estimating Relative Importance In Networks, KDD '03, ACM Press (2003), pp. 266-275.