An improved canopy transpiration model and parameter uncertainty analysis by Bayesian approach

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Volumn 51, Issue 11-12, 2010, Pages 1368-1374

  Li, Xianyue ^a,b   Yang, Peiling ^a   Ren, Shumei ^a   Li, Yunkai ^a   Xu, Tingwu ^a   Ren, Liang ^a   Wang, Caiyuan ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INNER MONGOLIA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Cherry trees; Improved transpiration model; Uncertainty estimation

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE VALUES; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BAYESIAN APPROACHES; ERROR TERMS; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; MEASURED DATA; MODEL UNCERTAINTIES; PARAMETER DISTRIBUTIONS; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; PENMAN-MONTEITH; PREDICTION UNCERTAINTY; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; PRUNUS AVIUM; SAP FLOW; SEASONAL VARIATION; SUB-HUMID; TRANSPIRATION RATES;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOLOGIC MODELS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; ORCHARDS; TRANSPIRATION;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 77950864596     PISSN: 08957177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.10.027     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Steve G., Keith M., Wünsche J.N., and Clothier B. Modeling light interception and transpiration of apple tree canopies. American Society of Agronomy 95 (2003) 1380-1387
2. Alves I., Perrier A., and Pereira L. Aerodynamic and surface resistances of complete cover crops: How good is the 'big leaf'?. Transactions of the ASAE 41 (1998) 345-351
3. Krzysztofowicz R. Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model. Water Resources Research 21 (1985) 805-814
4. Kingston G.B., Maier H.R., and Lambert M.F. A probabilistic method for assisting knowledge extraction from artificial neural networks used for hydrological prediction. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 44 (2006) 499-512
5. Benke K.K., Lowell K.E., and Hamilton A.J. Parameter uncertainty, sensitivity analysis and prediction error in a water-balance hydrological model. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 47 (2008) 1134-1149
6. Svensson M., Jansson P.E., Gustafsson D., Kleja D.B., Langvall O., and Lindroth A. Bayesian calibration of a model describing carbon, water and heat fluxes for a Swedish boreal forest stand. Ecological Modelling 213 (2008) 331-344
7. Liu Y., Yang P.J., Hu C., and Guo H. Water quality modeling for load reduction under uncertainty: A Bayesian approach. Water Research 42 (2008) 3305-3314
8. Monteith J.L. Evaporation and environment. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 19 (1965) 205-234
9. Samanta S., Mackay D.S., Clayton M.K., Kruger E.L., and Ewers B.E. Bayesian analysis for uncertainty estimation of a canopy transpiration model. Water Resources Research 43 W04424 (2007) 1-13
10. Pereira A.R., Green S., and Nova N.A. Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration adapted to estimate irrigated tree transpiration. Agricultural Water Management 83 (2006) 153-161
11. Shuttleworth W.J., and Wallace J.S. Evaporation from sparse crops-an energy combination theory. Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 111 (1985) 839-855
12. Kato T., Kimura R., and Kamichika M. Estimation of evapotranspiration, transpiration ratio and water-use efficiency from a sparse canopy using a compartment model. Agricultural Water Management 65 (2004) 173-191
13. Morgan C.L.S., Norman J.M., and Lowery B. Estimating plant-available water across a field with an inverse yield model. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67 (2003) 620-629
14. Sauer T.J., Singer J.W., and Prueger J.H. Radiation balance and evaporation partitioning in a narrow-row soybean canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 145 (2007) 206-214
15. Campbell G.S., and Norman J.M. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics (1998), Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg 40-45
16. Rana G., Katerji N., and Lorenzi F. Measurement and modelling of evapotranspiration of irrigated citrus orchard under Mediterranean conditions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 128 (2005) 199-209
17. Jarvis P.G. The interpretation of the variations in water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transpirations of the Royal Society of London B 273 (1976) 596-610
18. Oren R., Sperry J.S., Ewers B.E., Pataki D.E., Phillips N., and Megonigal J.P. Sensitivity of mean canopy stomatal conductance to vapor pressure deficit in a flooded Taxodium distichum L. forest: Hydraulic and non-hydraulic effects. Oecologia 126 (2001) 21-29
19. Demead O.T. Temperate cereals. In: Montieth J.L. (Ed). Vegetation and the Atomosphere vol. 2 (1976), Academic Press, London 1-31
20. Borsuk M.E., Higdon D., Stow C.A., and Reckhow K.H. A Bayesian hierarchical model to predict benthic oxygen demand from organic matter loading in estuaries and coastal zones. Ecological Modelling 143 (2001) 165-181
21. Kelliher F.M., Leuning R., Raupach M.R., and Schulze E.D. Maximum conductances for evaporation from global vegetation types. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 73 (1995) 1-16
22. White G., and Sun D. Simultaneous estimation of hunting pressure, harvest and hunter success rates using WinBUGS. Far East Journal of Theoretical Statistics 19 (2006) 91-116
23. Granier A. Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas fir stand by means of sap flow measurement. Tree Physiology 3 (1987) 309-320
24. Ahmadi S.H., Andersen M.N., Poulsen R.T., Plauborg F., and Hansen S. A quantitative approach to developing more mechanistic gas exchange models for field grown potato: A new insight into chemical and hydraulic signaling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 149 (2009) 1541-1551
25. Mackay D.S., Ahl D.E., Ewers B.E., Samanta S., Gower S.T., and Burrows S.N. Physiological tradeoffs in the parameterization of a model of canopy transpiration. Advances in Water Resources 26 (2003) 179-194