Using decision aids may improve informed consent for research

Contemporary Clinical Trials

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 218-220

  Brehaut, Jamie C ^a,b   Fergusson, Dean A ^a,b   Kimmelman, Jonathan ^c   Shojania, Kaveh G ^d   Saginur, Raphael ^a,e   Elwyn, Glyn ^f  

^a OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^f CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Decision aids; Informed consent; Study recruitment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSULTATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH; SYSTEMS THEORY;

EID: 77950860541     PISSN: 15517144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators 1998 Update. 2008.
2. General Medical Council. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together (2008) 1-61 Available: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/consent_guidance_index.asp (accessed 2010 January 29
3. Flory J., and Emmanuel E. Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA 292 (2004) 1593-1601
4. Horng S., Emanuel E.J., Wilfond B., et al. Description of benefits and risks in consent forms for phase I oncology trials. N Engl J Med 347 (2002) 2134-2140
5. Resnik D.B. Do informed consent documents matter?. Contemp Clin Trials 30 (2009) 114-115
6. Brehaut J., Saginur R., and Elwyn G. Informed consent documentation necessary but not sufficient. Contemp Clin Trials 30 (2009) 388-389
7. Fleissig A., Jenkins V., and Fallowfield L. Results of an intervention study to improve communication about randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy. Eur J Cancer 37 (2001) 322-331
8. Yap T.Y., Yamokoski A., Noll R., et al. A physician-directed intervention: teaching and measuring better informed consent. Acad Med 84 (2009) 1036-1042
9. Eccles M., Grimshaw J., Walker A., et al. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol 58 (2005) 107-112
10. Durand M.A., Stiel M., Boivin J., et al. Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. Patient Educ Couns 71 (2008) 125-135
11. Elwyn G., O'Connor A., Stacey D., et al. International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 333 (2006) 417
12. O'Connor A.M., Mulley A.G., and Wennberg J.E. Standard consultations are not enough to ensure decision quality regarding preference-sensitive options. J Natl Cancer I 95 (2003) 570-571
13. Elwyn G., O'Connor A.M., Bennett C., et al. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi). PLoS ONE 4 (2009) e4705
14. O'Connor A.M., Stacey D., Entwistle V., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions [Review]. The Cochrane Library 1 (2003)
15. Brehaut J.C., Lott A., Fergusson D., et al. Can patient decision aids help people make good decisions about participating in clinical trials? A study protocol. Implement Sci 3 (2008) 38
16. Juraskova I., Butow P., Lopez A., et al. Improving informed consent: pilot of a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial. Health Expect 11 (2008) 252-262
17. Entwistle V. Supporting participation in clinical research: decision aids for trial recruitment?. Health Expect 11 (2008) 205-207