Earthquake analysis of reinorced concrete minarets using ambient vibration test results

Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 257-273

  Bayraktar, Alemdar ^a   Sevim, Bariş ^a   Altunişik, Ahmet Can ^a   Türker, Temel ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBIENT VIBRATION TEST; ANALYTICAL FREQUENCIES; BEFORE AND AFTER; DAMPING RATIO; DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING; FREQUENCY DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION; HUMAN MOVEMENTS; MATERIAL PROPERTY; MODAL PARAMETERS; MODAL PROPERTIES; MODAL TESTINGS; MODE SHAPES; MODEL UPDATING; NATURAL EXCITATIONS; OPERATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) MODEL; TRABZON; TURKISHS;

CONCRETE TESTING; DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS; EARTHQUAKES; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; MODAL ANALYSIS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; POSITIVE IONS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TOWERS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VIBRATION ANALYSIS; WIND EFFECTS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 77950825068     PISSN: 15417794     EISSN: 15417808     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tal.464     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andersen P, Brincker R, Goursat M, Mevel L. 2007. Automated modal parameter estimation for Operational Modal Analysis of large systems. Proceedings of the 2nd International Operational Modal Analysis Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 299-308.
2. ANSYS. 2006. Swanson Analysis System, USA.
3. Baruch M, Bar Itzhac Y. 1978. Optimization weighted orthogonaliztion of measured modes. AIAA Journal 16(4): 346-351. (Pubitemid 8589101)
4. Bathe KJ. 1996. Finite Element Procedures In Engineering Analysis. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
5. Bayraktar A, Altunisik AC, Sevim B, Türker T. 2007. Modal testing and finite element model calibration of an arch type steel footbridge. Steel and Composite Structures. 7: 487-502.
6. Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P. 2000. Modal identifi cation from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. In Proceedings of the 18th International Modal Analysis Conference, San Antonio, TX, 7-10 February; 625-630. (Pubitemid 30591296)
7. Brincker R, Ventura CE, Andersen P. 2001a. Modal damping by frequency domain decomposition. In Proceedings of the XIX International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, 5-8 February; 698-703. (Pubitemid 32369944)
8. Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P. 2001b. Modal identifi cation of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition. Smart Material Structures. 10: 441-445. (Pubitemid 32637024)
9. Brownjohn JMW, Dumanoǧlu AA, Severn RT. 1992. Ambient vibration survey of the Fatih Sultan Mehmet (Second Bosporus) suspension bridge. Earthquake Engineering and Structural. Dynamics 21: 907-924.
10. Brownjohn JMW. 1997. Vibration characteristics of a suspension footbridge. Journal of Sound and Vibration 202(1): 29-46.
11. Caesar B. 1986. Update and identifi cation of dynamic mathematical models. Proceedings of the 4th International Modal Analysis Conference, Los Angeles, USA, 394-401.
12. Cantieni R. 2004. Experimental methods used in system identifi cation of civil engineering structures. 2th Workshop: Problemi di vibrazioni nelle strutture civili e nelle costruzioni meccaniche. Perugia: 1011.
13. Deger Y, Felber A, Cantieni R, Smet CAM. 1996. Dynamic modelling and testing of a cable stayed pedestrian bridge. In Proceedings of the 14th International Modal Analysis Conference, Dearborn, MI, 12-15 February; 211-217.
14. Dooms D, Degrande G, Roeck GD. 2006. Finite element modeling of a silo based on experimental modal analysis. Engineering Structures 28: 532-542. (Pubitemid 43055471)
15. Ewins DJ. 1984. Modal Testing: Theory and Practice. Res. Studies Press Ltd: England
16. Gentile C, Saisi A. 2007. Ambient vibration testing of historic masonry towers for structural identifi cation and damage assessment. Construction and Building Materials. 21: 1311-1321. (Pubitemid 46216789)
17. Imregun M, Visser WJ, Ewins DJ. 1995. Finite element model updating using frequency response function data I: Theory and initial investigation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 9(2): 187-202.
18. Jaishi B, Ren WX. 2005. Structural fi nite element model updating using ambient vibration test results. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE. 131(4): 617-628. (Pubitemid 40430157)
19. Juang JN. 1994. Applied System Identification, Prentice-Hal: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
20. Larsson PO, Sas P. 1992. Model updating based on forced vibration testing using numerically stable formulations. In Proceedings of the 10th International Modal Analysis Conference, San Diego, CA, 3-7 February; 966-974.
21. Ljung L. 1987. System Identification: Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
22. Lord JF, Ventura CE, Dascotte E. 2004. Automated model updating using ambient vibration data from a 48-storey building in Vancouver. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Modal Analysis Conference, Dearborn, Detroit, MI, 26-29 January; 26-29.
23. Maia NMM, Silva JMM. 1997. Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis. Research Studies Press Ltd: England.
24. Modak SV, Kundra TK, Nakra BC. 2002. Comparative study of model updating methods using experimental data. Computers and Structures 80(5-6): 437-447. (Pubitemid 34284524)
25. OMA. 2006. Operational Modal Analysis, Release 4.0, Structural Vibration Solution A/S, Denmark. PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre) http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/data (25 October 2007).
26. Peeters B, Roeck GD. 2000. Reference based stochastic subspace identifi cation in civil engineering. Inverse Problems in Engineering 8(1): 47-74.
27. Rainieri C, Fabbrocino G, Cosenza E, Manfredi G. 2007. Implementation of OMA procedures using labview: theory and application. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Modal Analyses Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, February 1984; 1-13.
28. Ren WX, Zhao T, Harik IE. 2004. Experimental and analytical modal analysis of steel arch bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE. 130: 1022-1031. (Pubitemid 40265004)
29. Roeck GD, Peeters B, Ren WX. 2000. Benchmark study on system identifi cation through ambient vibration measurements. In Proceedings of the 18th International Modal Analysis Conference, San Antonio, TX, 7-10 February; 1106-1112. (Pubitemid 30591514)
30. Sortis AD, Antonacci E, Vestroni F. 2005. Dynamic identification of a masonry building using forced vibration tests. Engineering Structures 27: 155-165. (Pubitemid 40102320)
31. Van Overschee P, De Moor B. 1996. Subspace Identifi cation for Linear Systems: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands.
32. Ventura CE, Lord JF, Simpson RD. 2002. Effective use of ambient vibration measurements for modal updating of a 48-storey building in Vancouver, Canada. In International Conference on Structural Dynamics Modelling-Test, Analysis Correlation and Validation, Instituto de Engenharia Macânica, Madeira Island, Portuga.
33. Wu JR, Li QS. 2004. Finite element model updating for a high-rise structure based on ambient vibration measurements. Engineering Structures 26(7): 979-990.
34. Yu DJ, Ren WX. 2005. EMD-based stochastic subspace identifi cation of structures from operational vibration measurements. Engineering Structures 27: 1741-1751.
35. Zivanovic S, Pavic A, Reynolds P. 2006. Modal testing and FE model tuning of a lively footbridge structure. Engineering Structures 28: 857-868. (Pubitemid 43204622)
36. Zivanovic S, Pavic A, Reynolds P. 2007. Finite element modelling and updating of a lively footbridge: the complete process. Journal of Sound and Vibration 301: 126-145. (Pubitemid 46110996)
37. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaret (02 November 2007)
38. http://lexicorient.com/e.o/minaret.htm (02 November 2007)