Amide Cis-trans isomerization in aqueous solutions of methyl N -Formyl- d -glucosaminides and Methyl N -Acetyl- d -glucosaminides: Chemical equilibria and exchange kinetics

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 132, Issue 13, 2010, Pages 4641-4652

  Hu, Xiaosong ^a   Zhang, Wenhui ^a   Carmichael, Ian ^a   Serianni, Anthony S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2-DEOXY-2; ACETAMIDO; ACTIVATION PARAMETER; AMINO SUGAR; ANOMERIC CONFIGURATION; ANOMERICS; ANOMERS; AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; BOND ROTATIONS; CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUMS; CIS-TRANS; CIS-TRANS ISOMERIZATION; DFT CALCULATION; EXCHANGE KINETICS; GLUCOPYRANOSIDE; INTERCONVERSIONS; NMR SPECTROSCOPY; SATURATION TRANSFER; SIDE CHAINS; SOLUTION TEMPERATURE; SPIN-COUPLING; TEMPERATURE RANGE; TEMPERATURE STUDY; THERMODYNAMIC PARAMETER;

ACTIVATION ENERGY; AMIDES; ELECTRON TRANSITIONS; ISOMERIZATION; ISOMERS; MODEL STRUCTURES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; RATE CONSTANTS; SOLUTIONS; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

SOLUTION MINING;

AMIDE; AMINOSUGAR; CARBOHYDRATE; GLUCOPYRANOSIDE; METHYL N ACETYL DEXTRO GLUCOSAMINIDE; METHYL N FORMYL DEXTRO GLUCOSAMINIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; ENERGY TRANSFER; ISOMERIZATION; KINETICS; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

AMIDES; CARBOHYDRATE CONFORMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; METHYLGLUCOSIDES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SOLUTIONS; STEREOISOMERISM; THERMODYNAMICS; WATER;

EID: 77950804843     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: 15205126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja9086787     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. cis-trans Isomerization in Biochemistry; Dugave, C., Ed.; J Wiley & Sons: New York, 2006.
2. Stein, R. L. Adv. Protein Chem. 1993, 44, 1 - 24
3. Schmid, F. X., Mayr, L. M., Mücke, M., and Schönbrunner, E. R. Adv. Protein Chem. 1993, 44, 25 - 66
4. Hur, S. and Bruice, T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7303 7313
5. Agarwal, P. K., Geist, A., and Gorin, A. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 10605 10618
6. Fanghänel, J. and Fischer, G. Front. Biosci. 2004, 9, 3453 3478
7. Lu, K. P., Finn, G., Lee, T. H., and Nicholson, L. K. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 619 - 629
8. Voet, D. and Voet, J. G. Biochemistry, 3 rd ed.; J. Wiley & Sons: New York, 2004; p 290.
9. Scherer, G., Kramer, M. L., Schutkowski, M., Reimer, U., and Fischer, G. J. Am. Chem., Soc. 1998, 120, 5568 - 5574
10. Schiene-Fischer, C. and Fischer, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6227 - 6231
11. Schiene-Fischer, C., Habazettl, J., Schmid, F. X., and Fischer, G. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9, 419 - 424
12. Tchaicheeyan, O. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 783 - 789
13. Bode, W., Wei, A. Z., Huber, R., Meyer, E., Travis, J., and Neumann, S. EMBO J. 1986, 5, 2453 - 2458
14. Austin, P. W., Hardy, F. E., Buchanan, J. C., and Baddiley, J. J. Chem. Soc. 1963, 5350 - 5353
15. Zhu, Y., Pan, Q., Thibaudeau, C., Zhao, S., Carmichael, I., and Serianni, A. S. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 466 - 479
16. Hodge, J. E. and Hofreiter, B. T. Methods Carbohydr. Chem. 1962, 1, 380 - 394
17. 2 octahydrate in this prior work; BaO was used as a substitute in the current work.)
18. Angyal, S. J., Bethell, G. S., and Beveridge, R. J. Carbohydr. Res. 1979, 73, 9 - 18
19. Tropper, F. D., Andersson, F. O., Grand-Maitre, C., and Roy, R. Carbohydr. Res. 1992, 229, 149 - 154
20. von Kienlin, M., Moonen, C. T. W., van der Toorn, A., and van Zijl, P. C. M. J. Magn. Reson. 1991, 93, 423 - 429
21. Canet, D. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 1997, 30, 101 - 135
22. Vuister, G. W., Boelens, R., Kaptein, R., Hurd, R. E., John, B., and van Zijl, P. C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9688 - 9690
23. Kay, L. E., Keifer, P., and Saarinen, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10663 - 10665
24. Forsén, S. and Hoffman, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 2892 - 2901
25. Campbell, I. D., Dobson, C. M., Ratcliffe, R. G., and Williams, R. J. P. J. Magn. Reson. 1978, 29, 397 - 417
26. Serianni, A. S., Pierce, J., Huang, S.-G., and Barker, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4037 - 4044
27. Snyder, J. R., Johnston, E. R., and Serianni, A. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2681 - 2687
28. Vold, R. L., Waugh, J. S., Klein, M. P., and Phelps, D. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 48, 3831 - 3832
29. Weiss, G. H. and Ferretti, J. A. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 1988, 4, 317 - 335
30. Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian03, Revision A.1; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
31. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648 - 5652
32. Hehre, W. J., Ditchfield, R., and Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 2257 - 2261
33. Cancés, M. T., Mennucci, B., and Tomasi, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3032 - 3041
34. Cammi, R., Mennucci, B., and Tomasi, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 5631 - 5637
35. Barone, V., Cossi, M., and Tomasi, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3210 - 3221
36. Katzenellenbogen, E., Romanowska, E., Kocharova, N. A., Shashkov, A. S., Knirel, Y. A., and Kochetkov, N. K. Carbohydr. Res. 1995, 273, 187 - 195
37. Muldoon, J., Shashkov, A. S., Senchenkova, S. N., Tomshich, S. V., Komandrova, N. A., Romanenko, L. A., Knirel, Y. A., and Savage, A. V. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 330, 231 - 239
38. Kocharova, N. A., Maszewska, A., Zatonsky, G. V., Bystrova, O. V., Ziolkowski, A., Torzewska, A., Shashkov, A. S., Knirel, Y. A., and Rozalski, A. Carbohydr. Res. 2003, 338, 1425 - 1430
39. Breazeale, S. D., Ribeiro, A. A., McClerren, A. L., and Raetz, C. R. H. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 14154 - 14167
40. Wawra, S. and Fischer, G. In cis-trans Isomerization in Biochemistry; Dugave, C., Ed.; J. Wiley & Sons: New York, 2006; pp 167 - 193.
41. Horton, D., Jewell, J. S., and Philips, K. D. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 4022 4025
42. Neuberger, A. and Fletcher, A. P. Carbohydr. Res. 1971, 17, 79 - 88 Two arguments have been offered to explain the predominant α-anomeric configuration of GlcNAc in aqueous solution. The first invokes a dipole-dipole interaction between the C1-O1 and the amide C - O bonds that is minimized in the α-pyranose. (34b) The second invokes hydrogen-bonding between the amide NAc side chain hydrogen and O1 as a means of preferentially stabilizing the α-pyranose (cis -fused five-membered ring). (34a) Both arguments presume an approximate α- anti /β- trans conformation of the NAc side chain in GlcNAc.
43. Mobli, M. and Almond, A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 2243 - 2251
44. Church, T., Carmichael, I., and Serianni, A. S. Carbohydr. Res. 1996, 280, 177 186
45. Serianni, A. S., Bondo, P. B., and Zajicek, J. J. Magn. Reson. 1996, 112B, 69 74
46. Zhao, S., Bondo, G., Zajicek, J., and Serianni, A. S. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 309, 145 - 152
47. Legube, G. and Trouche, D. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4, 944 - 847
48. Verdone, L., Agricola, E., Caserta, M., and Di Mauro, E. Briefings Funct. Genomics Proteomics 2006, 5, 209 - 221
49. McMillan, J. M. and McMillan, D. C. Toxicology 2006, 222, 175 - 184
50. Hurtado-Guerrero, R., Raimi, O. G., Min, J., Zeng, H., Vallius, L., Shepherd, S., Ibrahim, A. F. M., Wu, H., Plotnikov, A. N., and van Aalten, D. M. F. Biochem. J. 2008, 415, 217 - 223
51. Isaacs, N. Physical Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Longman Scientific and Technical: Harlow, England, 1995; p 350.
52. This survey was conducted on 1311 pdb files (from the RCSB PDB database) containing a total of 7994 GlcNAc residues. Within the latter group, 917 residues contained a H2-C2-N2-H torsion angle between 60° and -60°, producing an -11% α- syn population; the remaining -89% is α- trans. More pertinent to the present work, 463 residues contained a C2-N2-C1-C2 torsion angle between 60° and -60°, giving an -6% β- cis population.
53. Eliel and Wilen have suggested that the preference for trans amide conformations in solution is due to a combination of steric (attractive in trans, repulsive in cis) and charge interaction factors. See ref 44 for further discussion.
54. Eliel, E. L. and Wilen, S. H. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; Wiley: New York: 1994; pp 620 - 621.
55. 6 solvent (Figure S4 in Supporting Information). For 2, nearly identical coupling magnitudes were observed in both amide conformations (9.6 Hz in β- cis; 9.5 Hz in β- trans), suggesting similar bond conformations about bond α. On the other hand, the effect of amide conformation on α is probably smaller for N -formyl than for N -acetyl substituents. At present, similar J -coupling measurements have not been attempted in MeGlcNAc anomers because of the considerably less intense cis signals.