Effects of communication media on the interpretation of critical feedback

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 467-476

  Bietz, Matthew J ^a  

^a Ringgold Standard Institution Informatics   (United States)

Author keywords

Affordances; CMC; Computer mediated communication; Criticism; Gender; Instant messaging; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

AFFORDANCES; COMMUNICATION MEDIA; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; ELECTRONICALLY-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; INSTANT MESSAGING;

COMMUNICATION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MESSAGE PASSING; TELECONFERENCING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

GROUPWARE;

EID: 77950791151     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1460563.1460637     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & VandeWalle, D. Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedbackseeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29, 6 (2003), 773-799.
2. Blumberg, H. H. Communication of interpersonal evaluations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, Vol.23, 2 (1972), 157-162.
3. Bond, C. F., & Anderson, E. L. The reluctance to transmit bad news: Private discomfort or public display? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 2 (1987), 176-187.
4. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. Grounding in communication In Perspectives on socially shared cognition. L. B. Resnick & J. M. Levine & S. Teasley, Eds. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1991, 127-149.
5. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 5 (1986), 554-571.
6. Fredrickson, B. L. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 3 (2001), 218-226.
7. Hebert, B. G., & Vorauer, J. D. Seeing through the screen: Is evaluative feedback communicated more effectively in face-to-face or computer-mediated exchanges? Computers in Human Behavior, 19 (2003), 25-38.
8. Ilgen, D. R. Satisfaction with performance as a function of the initial level of expected performance and the deviation from expectations. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 6 (1971), 345-361.
9. Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 4 (1979), 349-371.
10. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work In Distributed Work. P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler, Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002, 137-162.
11. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33 (1977), 159-174.
12. Matheson, K. Social cues in computer-mediated negotiations: Gender makes a difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 3 (1991), 137-145.
13. Nease, A. A., Mudgett, B. O., & Quinones, M. A. Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptance of performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 5 (1999), 806-814.
14. O'Neill, J., & Martin, D. Text chat in action In Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, New York, 2003, 40-49.
15. Peterson, R. S., & Behfar, K. J. The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 92, 1/2 (2003), 102-112.
16. Podsakoff, P. M., & Farh, J.-l. Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 44, 1 (1989), 45-67.
17. Pornpitakpan, C. The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2 (2004), 243-281.
18. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization. Group Dynamics, 6, 1 (2002), 3-16.
19. Roche, E., Fox, J. A., Kaufer, S., Pearson, C., Porath, C., & Schouten, R. Do something - He's about to snap. Harvard Business Review, 81, 7 (2003), 23-35.
20. Shrauger, J. S., & Rosenberg, S. E. Self-esteem and the effects of success and failure feedback on performance. Journal of Personality, 38 (1970), 404-417.
21. Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 2 (1990), 121-134.
22. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991.
23. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 1 (1992), 50-88.
24. Williams, M. Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 32, 2 (2007), 595-621.