Framing nuclear waste as a political issue in France

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 12, Issue 7-8, 2009, Pages 941-954

  Barthe, Yannick ^a  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Agenda building; Decision; France; Nuclear waste; Path dependency; Risk regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950785842     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669870903126119     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Akrich, M., 1995. “ User representations:Practices, methods and sociology ”. In Managing technology in society:The approach of constructive technology assessment, Edited by:Rip, A., Misa, T.J., and Schot, J., 167–84. London:Pinter.
2. Akrich, M., Callon, M., and Latour, B., 2002. The key to success in innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6:187–206.
3. Arthur, W.B., 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99:116–31.
4. Barthe, Y., and Mays, C., 2001. Communication and information in France’s underground laboratory siting process:Clarity of procedure, ambivalence of effects. Journal of Risk Research, 4:411–30.
5. Baumgartner, F.R., and Jones, B.D., 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics, Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
6. Bourdieu, P., 1980. Le mort saisit le vif. Les relations entre l’histoire réifiée et l’histoire incorporée. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 32–33:3–14.
7. Callon, M., 1986. “ Some elements of a sociology of translation:Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc bay ”. In Power, action and belief:A new sociology of knowledge?, Edited by:Law, J., 196–229. London:Routledge.
8. Cobb, R.W., and Elder, C.D., 1983. Participation in American politics:The dynamic of agenda-building, Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press.
9. Cobb, R.W., and Ross, M.H., eds. 1997. Cultural strategies of agenda denial:Avoidance, attack, and redefinition, Lawrence, KS:University Press of Kansas.
10. David, P.A., 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75:332–7.
11. Favre, P., 1992. “ L’émergence des problèmes dans le champ politique ”. In Sida et politique. Les premiers affrontements 1981-1987, Edited by:Favre, P., 5–37. Paris:L’Harmattan.
12. Foray, D., 1992. “ Choix des techniques, rendements croissants et processus historiques:la nouvelle économie du changement technique ”. In La technoscience:Les fractures des discours, Edited by:Prades, J., 57–92. Paris:L’Harmattan.
13. Foucault, M., 1990. The history of sexuality, Vol. 2:The use of pleasure, New York:Vintage.
14. Foucault, M., 2003. Abnormal:Lectures at the College de France, 1974–1975, New York:Picador.
15. Garraud, P., 1980. “ Politique électro-nucléaire et stratégies de l’information ”. In L’information locale, Edited by:Mabileau, A., and Tudesq, A.-J., 129–45. Paris:Pedone.
16. Guedeney, C., and Mendel, G., 1973. L’angoisse atomique et les centrales nucléaires, Paris:Payot.
17. Hilgartner, S., Bell, R.C., and O’Connor, R., 1982. Nukespeak:Nuclear language, visions, and mindset, San Francisco:Sierra Club Books.
18. Hirschman, A.O., 1982. Shifting involvements:Private interest and public action, Princeton:Princeton University Press.
19. Hourcade, J.-C., 1991. “ La construction sociale des irréversibilités ”. In Les figures de l’irréversibilité en économie, Edited by:Boyer, R., Chavance, B., and Godard, O., 273–310. Paris:Editions de l’EHESS.
20. Jasper, J.M., 1992. “ Rational reconstructions of energy choices in France ”. In Organizations, uncertainties and risk, Edited by:Short, J.F., and Clarke, L., 223–33. Oxford:Westview Press.
21. Kasperson, R.E., 1992. “ The social amplification of risk:Progress in developing an integrative framework ”. In Social theories of risk, Edited by:Krimsky, S., and Golding, D., 153–78. Westport, CT:Praeger.
22. Kingdon, J.W., 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, Glenview:Scott, Foresman.
23. Lagroye, J., François, B., and Sawicki, F., 2002. Sociologie politique, Paris:Presses de Sciences Po and Dalloz.
24. Pierson, P., 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94:251–67.
25. Renn, O., Burns, W.J., Kasperson, J.X., Kasperson, R.E., and Slovic, P., 1992. The social amplification of risk:Theoretical foundations and empirical applications. Journal of Social Issues, 48:137–60.
26. Rochefort, D.A., and Cobb, R.W., eds. 1994. The politics of problem definition:Shaping the policy agenda, Lawrence, KS:University Press of Kansas.
27. Rose, R., 1990. Inheritance before choice in public policy. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2:263–91.
28. Sainteny, G., 1998. L’émergence d’un nouvel enjeu de politique publique:le pouvoir face à l’environnement. Politiques et Management Public, 16:130–58.
29. Walker, W., 2000. Entrapment in large technology systems:Institutional commitment and power relations. Research Policy, 29:833–46.
30. WHO (World Health Organization). 1958. Mental health aspects of the peaceful uses of atomic energy, Geneva:WHO. (Report of a Study Group, Technical Report Series no. 151)