Privatisation as state advance: Private indirect government in Vietnam

New Political Economy

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 257-274

  Gainsborough, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC REFORM; GOVERNMENT; PRIVATIZATION; STATE OWNED ENTERPRISE;

VIET NAM;

EID: 77950783816     PISSN: 13563467     EISSN: 14699923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13563460902826013     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson, B. (1983), 'Old State, New Society: Indonesia's New Order in Comparative Historical Perspective', Journal of Asian Studies, 42 (3), pp. 477-8.
2. Aslund, A. (2007), Russia's capitalist revolution: why market reform succeeded and democracy failed (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics).
3. Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W. (1996), 'A Theory of Privatisation', Economic Journal, 106 (435), pp. 309-19.
4. Camack, P. (2001), 'Making the Poor Work for Globalisation', New Political Economy, 6 (3), pp. 397-408.
5. Cameron, A., and Palan, R. (2004), The imagined economies of globalisation (London: Sage).
6. Cheshier, S. and Penrose, J. (2007), Top 200: industrial strategies of Vietnam's largest firms, UNDP. Available from: http://www.undp.org.vn/undpLive/System/Publications/Publication-Details?contentId=2395&languageId=1 [Accessed 23 January 2009]
7. Clarke, G. (2004), 'The social challenges of reform: restructuring state-owned enterprises in Vietnam', in D. McCargo ed., Rethinking Vietnam (London: RoutledgeCurzon), pp. 91-109.
8. Fforde, A. (2004), Vietnamese state-owned enterprises: 'real property', commercial performance and political economy. City University of Hong Kong, Working Paper Series 69, August.
9. Gainsborough, M. (2002), 'Political Change in Vietnam: In Search of the Middle Class Challenge to the State', Asian Survey, 42 (5), pp. 694-707.
10. Gainsborough, M. (2003), 'Slow, Quick Quick: Assessing Equitisation and Enterprise Performance Prospects in Vietnam', Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 19 (1), pp. 49-63.
11. Gainsborough, M. (2007), 'Globalisation and the State Revisited: A View from Provincial Vietnam', Journal of Contemporary Asia, 37 (1), pp. 1-18.
12. Gainsborough, M. (ed.) (2009), On the borders of state power: frontiers in the Greater Mekong sub-region (Oxford: Routledge).
13. Goldman, M.I. (2004), 'Putin and the Oligarchs', Foreign Affairs, 83 (6), pp. 33-44.
14. Guriev, S., and Rachinsky, A. (2005), 'The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1), pp. 131-50.
15. Heng, R.H.-K. (1999), Of the state, for the state, yet against the state: the struggle paradigm in Vietnam's media politics. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.
16. Hibiou, B. (ed.) (2004), Privatising the state, Trans. Jonathan Derrick (London: C. Hurst).
17. Jayasuriya, K. (2001), Governance, post-Washington Consensus and the new anti-politics, Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong, Working Paper Series, No. 2, April.
18. Jomo, K.S., and Fine, B. (eds.) (2006), The new development economics: after the Washington Consensus (London: Zed Books).
19. Kokko, A. (2004), 'Growth and reform since the Eighth Party Congress', in D. McCargo ed., Rethinking Vietnam (London: RoutledgeCurzon), pp. 69-90.
20. McMichael, P. (2000), 'Globalisation: myths and realities', in T. Roberts and A. Hite eds, From modernization to globalisation: perspectives on development and social change (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 274-91.
21. Ministry of Planning and Investment (2005), The Five-Year Socio-Economic Development Plan 2006-2010 Draft, Hanoi, September.
22. Nordholt, H., and van Klinken, G. (eds.) (2007), Renegotiating boundaries: local politics in post-Suharto Indonesia (Leiden: KITLV Press).
23. Painter, M. (2003), Marketisation, integration and state restructuring in vietnam: the case of state owned enterprise reform, City University of Hong Kong, Working Paper Series, No. 39, January, pp. 9-11.
24. Parker, D., and Kirkpatrick, C. (2005), 'Privatisation in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence and the Policy Lessons', Journal of Development Studies, 41 (4), pp. 513-41.
25. Phillips, N. (1998), Globalisation and the 'paradox of state power': perspectives from Latin America, CSGR Working Paper 16/98, University of Warwick.
26. Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W. (1994), 'Politicians and Firms', The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109 (4), pp. 995-1025.
27. Tai Chinh [Finance] (2005), 'Co Phan Nha nuoc vao tui tu nhan?' [Do equitised state assets end up in private pockets?], Tai Chinh, 2 November.
28. UNDP (2006), The state as investor: equitisation, privatisation and the transformation of SOEs in Viet Nam, UNDP Viet Nam Policy Dialogue Paper 2006/3, Ha Noi, October. Available from: http://www.undp.org.vn/undpLive/digitalAssets/6/6155_HP_paper__E_.pdf [Accessed 23 January 2009]
29. Vietnam Development Report (2004). Governance, Joint Donor Report to the Vietnam Consultative Group Meeting Hanoi, 1-2 December 2003.
30. Vietnam Development Report (2007). Aiming High, Joint Donor Report to the Vietnam Consultative Group Meeting Hanoi, 14-15 December 2006, pp. 59-64.
31. Vietnam News Agency (2008), 'Learning to speed-up equitisation', Vietnam News Agency, 3 September 2008. Available from: http://www.vnagency.com.vn/Home/EN/tabid/119/itemid/265823/Default.aspx [Accessed 22 January 2009].
32. Walker, A. (1999), The legend of the golden boat: regulation, trade and traders in the borderlands of Laos, Thailand, China and Burma (Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press).
33. Weiss, L. (1997), 'Globalisation and the Myth of the Powerless State', New Left Review, 1 (225), pp. 1-25.
34. World Bank (2002), Transition: the first ten years: analysis and lessons for Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union (Washington, DC: World Bank).