Implementing integrated land management in western Canada: Policy reform and the resilience of clientelism

Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 321-334

  Rayner, Jeremy ^a   Howlett, Michael ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950783507     PISSN: 19390459     EISSN: 19390467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19390450903137565     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alberta, Government of Alberta (2008) Final Land Use Framework. http://www.landuse.alberta.ca/ (Accessed:1 March 2009).
2. Appleby, A., Bell, A., Bingeman, K., Churchill, B., & Plotkin, R. (2004) Integrated Land Use Planning and Canada's New National Forest Strategy (Ottawa:Sierra Club of Canada). http://ilm.law.uvic.ca/resources/index.htm (Accessed:3 January 2009).
3. Atkinson, M., and Coleman, W., 1989. The State, Business and Industrial Development in Canada, Toronto:University of Toronto Press.
4. Beland, D., 2007. Ideas and institutional change in social security:Conversion, layering and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly, 88 (1):20–38.
5. Bode, I., 2006. Disorganized welfare mixes:Voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 16 (4):346–359.
6. Briassoulis, H., Policy integration for complex policy problems:What, why and how. Paper presented at the 2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change:Greening of Policies—Interlinkages and Policy Integration. December5–62004, Berlin.
7. Briassoulis, H., 2005. “ Analysis of policy integration:Conceptual and methodological consideration ”. In Policy Integration for Complex Environmental Problems:The Example of Mediterranean Desertification, Edited by:Briassoulis, H., 50–80. Aldershot:Ashgate.
8. Butler, S., 2009. Obstacles to the implementation of an integrated national alcohol policy in Ireland:Nannies, neo-liberals and joined-up government. Journal of Social Policy, 38 (2):343–359.
9. Canada, Policy Research Initiative (n.d.) Integrated Landscape Management Models for Sustainable Development Policy Making. http://ilm.law.uvic.ca/resources/index.htm (Accessed:3 January 2009).
10. CILMC (Canadian Integrated Landscape Management Coalition) (2005) Integrated Landscape Management:Applying Sustainable Development to Land Use. http://ilm.law.uvic.ca/resources/index.htm (Accessed:3 January 2009).
11. Cashore, B, Hoberg, G., Howlett, M., Rayner, J., and Wilson, J., 2001. In Search of Sustainability:British Columbia Forest Policy in the 1990s, Vancouver:University of British Columbia Press.
12. Cashore, B., and Howlett, M., 2007. Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest forestry. American Journal of Political Science, 51 (3):532–551.
13. Day, J. C., Gunton, T. J., and Frame, T. M., 2003. Toward environmental sustainability in British Columbia:The role of collaborative planning. Environments, 31 (2):21–38.
14. Demulder, B., and Thorp, W., 2007. Integrated Landscape Management:Moving Forward, 2003–2007, Edmonton:Alberta Chamber of Resources.
15. Farr, D., Kennett, S., Ross, M., Stelfox, B., & Weber, M. (2004) Al-Pac Case Study Report—Part 2, Regulatory Barriers and Options. Prepared for the NRTEE (Calgary:Canadian Institute for Resource Law). http://ilm.law.uvic.ca/resources/index.htm (Accessed:3 January 2009).
16. Foster, D., Motzkin, G., and Slater, B., 1998. Land use history as long term, broad scale disturbance:Regional forest dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems, 1:96–119.
17. Grabosky, P., 1995. Counterproductive regulation. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 23:347–369.
18. Gregersen, H., Folliot, P., and Brooks, K., 2008. Integrated Watershed Management, Wallingford:CABI.
19. Hacker, J. S., 2004a. Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state:The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98 (2):243–260.
20. Hacker, J. S., 2004b. Reform without Change, Change without Reform:The Politics of US Transatlantic Policymaking in an Age of Austerity:Diversity and Drift, 13–63. Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press.
21. Hacker, J. S., 2004c. Review article:Dismantling the health care state? Political institutions, public policies and the comparative politics of health reform. British Journal of Political Science, 34:693–724.
22. Hacker, J. S., 2005. “ Policy drift:The hidden politics of US welfare state retrenchment ”. In Beyond continuity:Institutional change in advanced political economies, Edited by:Streek, W., and Thelen, K., 40–82. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
23. Hall, P., and Thelen, K., 2009. Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 7 (1):7–34.
24. Hall, P. A., 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning and the state:The case of economic policy making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25 (3):275–296.
25. Hanna, K., and Slocombe, D. S., 2007. Integrated Resource and Environmental Management:Concepts and Practice, Toronto:Oxford University Press.
26. Hawkins, V., and Selman, P., 2002. Landscape scale planning:Exploring alternative land use scenarios. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60 (4):211–224.
27. Howlett, M., and Brownsey, K., eds. 2008. Canada's Resource Economy in Transition:The Past, Present and Future of Canadian Staples Industries, Toronto:Emond Montgomery.
28. Howlett, M., and Cashore, B., 2009. The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change:Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice, 11 (1):33–46.
29. Howlett, M., and Rayner, J., 2001. “ The business and government nexus:Principal elements and dynamics of the Canadian forest policy regime ”. In Canadian Forest Policy:Adapting to Change, Edited by:Howlett, M., 23–62. Toronto, Buffalo and London:University of Toronto Press.
30. Howlett, M., and Rayner, J., 2007. Design principles for policy mixes:Cohesion and coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26 (4):1–18.
31. Jackson, T., and Curry, J., 2004. Peace in the woods:Sustainability and the democratization of land use planning and resource management on Crown lands in British Columbia. International Planning Studies, 9 (1):27–42.
32. Kennett, S., 2002. Integrated Resource Management in Alberta:Past, Present and Benchmarks for the Future Canadian Institute of Resources Law, Calgary:Canadian Institute of Resources Law. Occasional Paper No. 11
33. Kennett, S. A., 2006. Integrated Landscape Management in Canada:Getting from Here to There, Calgary:Canadian Institute of Resources Law. Occasional Paper, 17
34. Kennett, S., and Schneider, R., 2008. Making it Real:Implementing Alberta's Land Use Framework, Edmonton:Pembina Institute and Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society.
35. Keysar, E., 2005. Procedural integration in support of environmental policy objectives:Implementing sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48 (4):549–569.
36. Mackendrick, N., Fluet, C., Davidson, D. J., Krogman, N., & Ross, M. (2002) Integrated Resource Management in Alberta's Boreal Forest:Opportunities and Constraints. Interim project report (Edmonton:Sustainable Forest Management Network). http://ilm.law.uvic.ca/resources/index.htm (Accessed:3 January 2009).
37. Manitoba, Manitoba Conservation (2008) East Side Lake Winnipeg:Wabanong Nakaygum Okimawin. http://www.gov.mb.ca/conservation/wno/pdf/com_services_eastside_160316.pdf (Accessed:1 March 2009).
38. Mason, M., 1999. Environmental Democracy, London:Earthscan.
39. May, P. J., Jones, B. D., Beem, B. E., Neff-Sharum, E. A., and Pogue, M. K., 2005. Policy coherence and component-driven policymaking:Arctic policy in Canada and the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 33 (1):37–63.
40. Meijers, E., and Stead, D., Policy integration:What does it mean and how can it be achieved? A multi-disciplinary review. Paper presented at the 2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change:Greening of Policies—Interlinkages and Policy Integration. December5–62004, Berlin.
41. NRTEE (National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy) (2005) Boreal Futures:Governance, Conservation and Development in Canada's Boreal (Ottawa:Renouf). http://ilm.law.uvic.ca/resources/index.htm (Accessed:3 January 2009).
42. Pierce Lefebvre Consulting. 2001. Socio-economic Assessment of the Provincial Government's Land Use Plans on Key Ssectors in British Columbia. Presented to the Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management.
43. Pratt, L., and Urquhart, I., 1994. The Last Great Forest:Japanese Multinationals and Alberta's Northern Forests, Edmonton:NewWest.
44. Saglie, I.-L., 2006. “ Fragmented institutions:The problems facing natural resource management ”. In Networks and Institutions in Natural Resource Management, Edited by:Rydin, Y., and Falleth, E., 1–14. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
45. Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan Environment. 1995. A Framework for Integrated Land and Resource Management Planning, Regina, Canada:Queen's Printer.
46. Schneider, R. R., Stelfox, J. B. Boutin, S., & Wasel, S. (2002) The Management of Cumulative Impacts of Land-Uses in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin:A Case Study Sustainable Forest Management NCE Working Paper. http://www.sfmnetwork.ca/docs/e/WP_2002-5.pdf (Accessed:12 May 2009).
47. Geerlings, H., and Meijers, E., 2004. Policy Integration in Practice:The Integration of Land Use Planning, Transport and Environmental Policy-Making in Denmark, England and Germany, Edited by:Stead, D., Delft:Delft University Press.
48. Streeck, W., and Thelen, K., 2005. “ Institutional change in advanced political economies ”. In Beyond Continuity:Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Edited by:Streeck, W., and K. Thelen. 1–39. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
49. Thelen, K., 2003. “ How institutions evolve:Insights from comparative historical analysis ”. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Edited by:Mahoney, J., and Rueschemeyer, D., 208–240. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
50. Torenvlied, R., and Akkerman, A., 2004. Theory of ‘soft’ policy implementation in multilevel systems with an application to social partnership in the Netherlands. Acta Politica, 39:31–58.
51. Wilson, J., 1998. Talk and Log:Wilderness Politics in British Columbia, Vancouver:UBC Press.