The Numbers Do(n't) Always Add Up: Dilemmas in Using Quantitative Research Methods in Feminist IR Scholarship

Politics and Gender

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 410-419

  Parisi, Laura ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950780540     PISSN: 1743923X     EISSN: 17439248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X09990201     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Ackerly Brooke A., Stern Maria, and True Jacqui. 2006. “Feminist Methodologies for International Relations.” In Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, ed. Ackerly Brooke A., Stern Maria, and True Jacqui. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barker Drucilla K. 2006. “A Seat at the Table: Feminists Negotiate Development.” In Feminist Economics and the World Bank: History, Theory, and Policy, ed. Kuiper Edith and Barker Drucilla K. London and New York: Routledge.
3. Barriteau V. Eudine. 2006. “Engendering Development or Gender Mainstreaming? A Critical Assessment from the Commonwealth Caribbean.” In Feminist Economics and the World Bank: History, Theory, and Policy, ed. Kuiper Edith and Barker Drucilla K. London and New York: Routledge.
4. Beetham Gwendolyn, and Demetriades Justina. 2007. “Feminist Research Methodologies and Development: Overview and Practical Application.” Gender & Development 15 (2): 199–216.
5. Benería Lourdes. 2003. Gender, Development, and Globalization: Economics as If All People Mattered. New York and London: Routledge.
6. Caprioli Mary. (2004). “Feminist IR Theory and Quantitative Methodology: A Critical Analysis.” International Studies Review 6 (2): 253–70.
7. Chant Sylvia. 2006. “Contributions of a Gender Perspective to the Analysis of Poverty.” In Women and Gender Equity in Development Theory and Practice: Institutions, Resources, and Mobilization, ed. Jaquette Jane and Summerfield Gale. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
8. Fukuda-Parr Sakiko. 1999. “What Does Feminization of Poverty Mean? It Isn't Just Lack of Income.” Feminist Economics 5 (2): 99–103.
9. Jackson Cecile, 2002. “Disciplining Gender?” World Development 30 (3): 497–509.
10. Kinsella Helen. 2003. “For a Careful Reading: The Conservatism of Gender Constructivism.” Review of International Studies 5: 287–302.
11. Lind Amy, and Share Jessica. 2003. “Queering Development: Institutionalized Heterosexuality in Development Theory, Practice, and Politics in Latin America.” In Feminist Futures: Re-Imagining Women, Culture, and Development, ed. Bhavnani Kum-Kum, Foran John, and Kurian Priya. London and New York: Zed Books.
12. McIlwaine Cathy, and Datta Kavita. 2003. “From Feminising to Engendering Development.” Gender, Place, and Culture 10 (4): 369–82.
13. Morris Morris David. 1979. Measuring the Condition of the World's Poor: The Physical Quality of Life Index. New York: Pergamon.
14. Otto Dianne. 2001. “Defending Women's Economic and Social Rights: Some Thoughts on Indivisibility and a New Standard of Equality.” In Giving Meaning to Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, ed. Merali Isfahan and Oosterveld Valerie, eds. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
15. Parisi Laura. 2006. “‘Disciplining’ and ‘Engendering’ the World Bank: A Comment.” In Feminist Economics and the World Bank: History, Theory, and Policy, ed. Kuiper Edith and Barker Drucilla K. London and New York: Routledge.
16. Staudt Kathleen. 2002. “Dismantling the Master's House with the Master's Tools? Gender Work in and with Powerful Bureaucracies.” In Feminist Post-Development Thought: Rethinking Modernity, Post-Colonialism, and Representation, ed. Saunders Kriemild. London and New York: Zed Books: 57–69.
17. Tickner J. Ann. 2006. “Feminism Meets International Relations: Some Methodological Issues.” In Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, ed. Ackerly Brooke A., Stern Maria, and True Jacqui. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. UNDP 1995. Human Development Report, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. World Bank. 2001. Engendering Development: Through Gender Equality in Rights, Resources, and Voice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.