Test use and political philosophy

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 29, Issue , 2009, Pages 3-20

  Fulcher, Glenn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950766414     PISSN: 02671905     EISSN: 14716356     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1017/S0267190509090023     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Alderson, J. C. (2007). The CEFR and the need for more research. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 659-663.
2. German Propaganda Archive. (1937). The educational principles of the new Germany. Frauen-Warte, 22, 692-693. Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/frau01.htm
3. Benn, T. (1976). The legacy of the levellers. [Speech delivered on May 15, 1976, at Burford, Oxfordshire] Retrieved July 12, 2008, from http://www.channel4.com/history/microsites/H/history/a-b/pdf/benn.pdf
4. Black, E. (2003). War against the weak: Eugenics and America's campaign to creat a master race. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.
5. Black, J. (2005). Using history. London: Hodder Arnold
6. Bonnet, G. (2007) The CEFR and education olicies in Europe. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 669-672.
7. Brindley, G. (2008). Educational reform and language testing. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 365-378). New York: Springer.
8. Carpenter, D. (2004). The struggle for mastery: Britain 1066-1284. London: Penguin.
9. Cassirer, E. (1946). The myth of the state. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
10. Cattell, R. B. (1937). The fight for our national intelligence. London: P. S. King and Son.
11. Cecil, R. (1971). Education and elitism in Nazi Germany. ICR Monograph Series No. 5. London: Institute for Cultural Research.
12. Chalhoub-Deville, M., & Deville, C. (2008). Nationally mandated testing for accountability: English language learners in the U.S. In B. Spolsky & F. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 510-522). London: Blackwell.
13. Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M. (Eds.). (2008). Building a validit argument for the test of English as a foreign language. London and New York: Routledge.
14. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, Teaching nd assessment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved July 12, 2008, from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/ linguistic/Source/Framework-EN.pdf
15. Council of Europe (2008). Recommendation CM/Rec(2008)7 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the use of the Council of Europe's common European framework of reference for languages (CEFR) and the promotion of plurilingualism. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
16. Davidson, F., & Fulcher, G. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference(CEFR) and the design of language tests: A matter of effect. Language Teaching, 40, 231-241.
17. Davies, A. (1997a). Introduction: The limits of ethics in language testing. Language Testing, 14(3), 235-241.
18. Davies, A. (1997b). Demands of being professional in language testing. Language Testing, 14(3), 328-339.
19. Davies, A. (2008). Ethics and professionalism. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 429-443). New York: Springer.
20. Dewey, J. (1888). The ethics of democracy. In L. Menand (Ed.), Pragmatism: Reader (pp. 182-204). New York: Vintage Books
21. Elder, C. (1997). What does test bias have to do with fairness? Language Testing, 14(3), 261-277.
22. Evans, B., & Waites, B. (1981). IQ and mental testing: An unnatural science and it social history. London: Macmillan.
23. Fejes, A. (2008). European citizens under construction: The Bologna process analysed from a governmentality perspective. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(4), 515-530.
24. Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
25. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction. New York: Vintage.
26. Fulcher, G. (2004). Deluded by artifices? The Common European Framework and harmonization. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(4), 253-266.
27. Fulcher, G. (2008, July 20-24). Testing times ahead? Liaison Magazine, 1. Retrieved July 12, 2008, from www.llas.ac.uk/resourcedownloads.aspx?resourceid= 179&filename=liaison-july08.pdf
28. Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment. London and New York: Routledge.
29. Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2008). Tests in life and learning: A deathly dialogue. Educational Theory and Philosophy, 40(3), 407-417.
30. Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2009). Test architecture. Test retrofit. Language Testing, 26, (1) 123-144 .
31. Gobineau, de, A. (1999). The inequality of human races. New York: Howard Fertig.
32. Harris, S. (2008). Internationalising the university. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(2), 346-357.
33. Jones, C. W. (1963). An early medieval licensing examination. History of Education Quarterly, 3(1), 19-29.
34. Kaftandjieva, F. (2007). Quantifying the quality of linkage between language examinations and the CEF. In C. Carlsen & E. Moe (Eds.), A human touch t language testing (pp. 33-43). Oslo: Novus Press.
35. Kelly, M. (2004) Engaging with Europe. Liaison Magazine, 5(1), 1. Retrieved August 11, 2007, from www.llas.ac.uk/resourcedownloads.aspx? resourceid=179& filename=liaison-feb04.odf
36. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, E. (2008a). Dynamic assessment. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 273-284). New York: Springer.
37. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, E. (2008b). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Multilingual Matters.
38. Locke, J. (2002). The second treatise of government. In T. Crawford (Ed.), The second treatise of government and a letter concerning toleration. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1690
39. Maier, P. (Ed.). (1998). The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States. New York: Bantam Books.
40. Mansell,W. (2007). Education by numbers: The tyranny of testing. London: Methuen.
41. McNamara, T. (2005). 21st century Shibboleth: Language tests, identity and intergroup conflict. Language Policy, 4(4), 351-370.
42. McNamara, T. (2008). The socio-political and power dimensions of tests. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 7. Language testing and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 415-427). New York: Springer.
43. McNamara, T., & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. London: Blackwell.
44. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan/American Council on Education.
45. Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. In J. Gray (Ed.), John Stuart Mill on liberty and other essays. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
46. Mill, J. S. (1873). Autobiography. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.
47. Mislevy, R. J., & Riconscente, M. M. (2005). Evidence-centered assessment design: Layers, structures, and terminology. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
48. Miyazaki, I. (1981). China's examination hell (2nd ed.) New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
49. Moss, P. (2003). Reconceptualizing validity for classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 13-25.
50. Noakes, J., & Pridham, G. (1983). Nazism: A history in documents and eyewitness accounts, 1919-1945. Exeter, England: Exeter University Press.
51. North, B., Figueras, N., Takala, S., Van Avermaet, P., & Verhelst, N. (2003). Relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEF): Manual preliminary pilot version. Strasbourg, France: Language Policy Division of the Council of Europe.
52. Paine, T. (1999). Rights of man. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1791
53. Plato. (1987). The republic (2nd rev. ed.; Desmond Lee, Trans.). London: Penguin Classics. Retrieved July 12, 2008, from http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/ republic.html (Original work published 360 BC
54. Popper, K. (2002). The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.
55. Putnam, H. (1995). A reconsideration of Deweyan democracy. R. B. Goodman (Ed.), Pragmatism: A contemporary reader (pp. 183-204). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1990: Southern Californian Law Review, 63, 1671-1697
56. Rauhvargers, A. (2004). Improving the recognition of qualifications in the framework of the Bologna process. European Journal of Education, 39(3), 331-347.
57. Rea-Dickens, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18(4), 429-462.
58. Sharp, A. (1998). The English levellers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
59. Shohamy, E. (2001a). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. London: Longman.
60. Shohamy, E. (2001b). Democratic assessment as an alternative. Language Testing, 18(4), 373-392.
61. Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence: Objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-292.
62. Sperber, J. (1994). The European revolutions, 1848-1851. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
63. Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured words. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
64. Terman, L. (1919). The measurement of intelligence. London: Harrap.
65. Thucydides. (1954). History of the Peloponnesian war (Rex Warner, Trans.). London: Penguin Classics. Cira. 404 BC]
66. Tillich, P. (1952). The courage to be (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
67. von Humboldt, W. (1854). The limits of state action. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.
68. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. (A.M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Xi, X. (forthcoming). How do e go about investigating test fairness? Language Testing.
69. Yerkes, R. M. (1921). Psychological examining in the United States Army. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. XV. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.