Exploring the moral dimension of wicked problems*

International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

Volumn 29, Issue , 2009, Pages 531-542

  Wexler, Mark N ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ethics; Knowledge management; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950763063     PISSN: 0144333X     EISSN: 17586720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/01443330910986306     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Atwood, L. and Major, M. (1998), “Exploring the cry wolf hypothesis”, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 279-302.
2. Blackman, T., Elliott, E., Greene, A., Harrington, B., Hunter, D., Marks, L., McKee, L. and Williams, G. (2006), “Performance assessment and wicked problems: the case of health inequalities”, Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 66-80.
3. Breznitz, S. (1984), Cry-Wolf: The Psychology of False Alarms, Laurence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Brooks, J. and Champ, P. (2006), “Understanding the wicked nature of ‘unmanaged recreation’ in Colorado's front range”, Environmental Management, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 784-98.
5. Buchanan, R. (1995), “Wicked problems in design thinking”, in Margolis, V. and Buchanan, R. (Eds), The Idea of Design, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 3-20.
6. Calton, J. and Payne, S. (2003), “Coping with paradox: multistakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sensemaking process for addressing messy problems”, Business and Society, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 7-42.
7. Camillus, J.C. (2008), “Strategy as a wicked problem”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86 No. 5, pp. 99-106.
8. Churchman, C.W. (1967), “Wicked problems”, Management Science, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 141-42.
9. Conklin, E.J. (2006), Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems, Wiley, London.
10. Courtney, J. (2001), “Decision making and knowledge management in inquiring organizations: towards a new decision-making paradigm for DSS”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 17-38.
11. Coyne, R. (2005), “Wicked problems revisited”, Design Studies, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 5-17.
12. Dunne, D. and Martin, R. (2006), “Design thinking and how it will change management education: an interview and discussion”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 512-23.
13. Durant, R. and Legge, J. (2006), “Wicked problems: public policy and administrative theory: lessons from the GM food regulatory arena”, Administration & Society, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 309-34.
14. Fitzpatrick, G. (2003), The Locales Framework: Understanding and Designing for Wicked Problems, Springer, New York, NY.
15. Freeman, D.M. (2000), “Wicked water problems: sociology and local water organizations in addressing water resource policy”, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 483-91.
16. Grant, D. (1982), “Issue-based information system (IBIS)”, in Olsen, S.A. (Ed.), Group Planning and Problem-solving Methods in Engineering Management, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, pp. 203-46.
17. Grint, K. (2005), “Problems, problems, problems: the social construction of ‘leadership’”, Human Relations, Vol. 58 No. 11, pp. 1467-94.
18. Harrison, T. (2000), “Urban policy: addressing wicked problems”, in Davies, H., Nutley, S. and Smith, P. (Eds), What Works? Evidence-based Policy and Practice in Public Services, The Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 207-28.
19. Hisschemöller, M. and Hoppe, R. (1995), “Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis”, Knowledge, Technology and Policy, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 40-60.
20. Korac-Kakabadse, N., Kouzmin, A. and Korac-Kakabadse, A. (2000), “Information technology and development: creating IT harems, fostering colonialism or solving wicked problems?”, Public Administration and Development, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 171-84.
21. Kreuter, M., DeRosa, C., Howze, E. and Baldwin, G. (2004), “Understanding wicked problems: a key to advancing environmental health promotion”, Health Education and Behavior, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 441-54.
22. Kuhn, T.S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
23. Lyles, M. and Thomas, H. (1998), “Strategic problem formulation: biases and assumptions embedded in alternative decision-making models”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 131-45.
24. Mackenzie, A., Pidd, M., Rooksby, J., Sommerville, I., Warren, I. and Westcombe, M. (2006), “Wisdom, decision support and paradigms of decision making”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 170 No. 1, pp. 156-71.
25. Munneke, L., Andriessen, J., Kanselaar, G. and Kirschner, P. (2006), “Supporting interactive argumentation: influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 1072-88.
26. Norton, B.G. (2005), Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
27. O'Toole, L.J. (1997), “Treating networks seriously: practical and research-based agendas in public administration”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 45-52.
28. Pacanowsky, M. (1995), “Team tools for wicked problems”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 36-51.
29. Pellizzoni, L. (2001), “The myth of the best argument: power, deliberation and reason”, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 59-86.
30. Pries-Heje, J. and Baskerville, R. (2008), “The design nexus”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 731-55.
31. Rith, C. and Dubberly, H. (2007), “Why Horst W.J. Rittel matters”, Design Issues, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 72-4.
32. Rittel, H. (1973a), “On the planning crisis: systems analysis of the first and second generations”, Bedrifts Okonomen, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 390-6.
33. Rittel, H. (1973b), “The state of the art in design methods”, DMG-DRS Journal: Design Research and Methods, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 43-8.
34. Rittel, H. (1983), “How to know what is known: designing crutches for communication”, Proceedings of the Fifth International Research Forum in Information Science (IRF IPS), Heidelberg.
35. Rittel, H. and Kunz, W. (1970), “Issues as elements of information systems”, Working Paper No. 131, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkely, CA.
36. Rittel, H. and Webber, M.M. (1973), “Dilemmas in a general theory of planning”, Political Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 155-69.
37. Roberts, N.C. (2000), “Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution”, International Public Management Review, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-19.
38. Roberts, N.C. (2004), “Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation”, The American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 315-53.
39. Sementelli, A. (2007), “Distortion of progress: evolutionary theories and public administration”, Administration and Society, Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 740-60.
40. Skaburskis, A. (2008), “The origins of ‘wicked problems’”, Planning Theory and Practice, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 277-88.
41. van Bueren, E.M., Klijn, E. and Koppenjan, J.F.M. (2003), “Dealing with wicked problems in networks analysis on environmental debate from a network perspective”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 193-212.
42. Vasishth, A. and Sloane, D. (2002), “Returning to ecology, an ecosystems approach to understanding the city”, in Dear, M.J. (Ed.), From Chicago to LA: Making Sense of Urban Theory, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 343-66.
43. Weber, E. and Khademian, A. (2008), “Wicked problems, knowledge challenges and collaborative capacity builders in network settings”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 68 No. 2, pp. 334-49.
44. Wildavsky, A. (2006), Speaking Truth to Power: The Act and Craft of Policy Analysis, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.
45. Rittel, H. and Kunz, W. (1972), “Information science: on the structure of its problems”, Information Storage and Retrieval, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 95-8.
46. Roberts, N.C. (2001), “Coping with wicked problems: the case of Afghanistan”, Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 353-75.