Exploring relationships between touch perception and surface physical properties

International Journal of Design

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 67-76

  Chen, Xiaojuan ^a   Shao, Fei ^a   Barnes, Cathy ^a   Childs, Tom ^a   Henson, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Product experience; Roughness; Texture; Touch perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950761373     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barnes, C. J., Childs, T. H. C., Henson, B., & Southee, C. H. (2004). Surface finish and touch-A case study in a new human factors tribology. Wear, 257(7-8), 740-750.
2. Childs, T. H. C., & Henson, B. (2007). Human tactile perception of screen-printed surfaces: Self-report and contact mechanics experiments. Journal of Engineering Tribology, 221(3), 421-441.
3. Desmet, P. (2007). Product emotion. In H. N. J. Schifferstein & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product Experience-A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 379-397). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
4. Ekman, G., Hosman, J., & Lindstrom, B. (1965). Roughness, smoothness, and preference: A study of quantitative relations in individual subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(1), 18-26.
5. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415(6870), 429-433.
6. Gescheider, G. A., Bolanowski, S. J., Greenfield, T. C., & Brunette, K. E. (2005). Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: A multidimensional analysis. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 22(3), 127-140.
7. Harper, R., & Stevens, S. S. (1964). Subjective hardness of compliant materials. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(3), 204-215.
8. Henson, B., Barnes, C. J., Livesey, R., Childs, T. H. C., & Ewart, K. (2006). Affective consumer requirements: A case study of moisturizer packaging. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 14(3), 187-196.
9. Hollins, M., & Bensmaia, S. J., (2007). The coding of roughness. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 184-195.
10. Hollins, M., Bensmaia, S., Karlof, K., & Young, F. (2000). Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(8), 1534-1544.
11. Hollins, M., Faldowski, R., Rao, S., & Young, F. (1993). Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture-A multidimensional-scaling analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(6), 697-705.
12. Hollins, M., Lorenz, F., Seeger, A., & Taylor, R. (2005). Factors contributing to the integration of textural qualities: Evidence from virtual surfaces. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 22(3), 193-206
13. Hu, J. Y., Hes, L., Li, Y., Yeung, K. W., & Yao, B. G. (2006). Fabric touch tester: Integrated evaluation of thermal mechanical sensory properties of polymeric materials. Polymer Testing, 25(8), 1081-1090.
14. th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Karana, E., Hekkert, P., & Kandachar, P. (2009). Meanings of materials through sensorial properties and manufacturing processes. Materials & Design, 30(7), 2778-2784.
16. Kawabata, S. (1982). The development of the objective measurement of fabric handle. In S. Kawabata, R. Postle, & M. Niwa (Eds.), Objective specification of fabric quality, mechanical properties and performance (pp. 31-60). Osaka, Japan: Textile Machinery Society of Japan.
17. Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (2002). Touch. In A. F. Healy & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Experimental psychology (Chap. 6, pp. 147-176). New York: Wiley.
18. Kringelbach, M. L., (2005). The human orbitofrontal cortex: Linking reward to hedonic experience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(9), 691-702.
19. Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (Eds.). (2007). Special issue: New directions in touch. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 169-275.
20. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits of our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
21. Nagamachi, M. (1995). Kansei engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15(1), 3-11.
22. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois Press.
23. Schütte, S. (2005). Engineering emotional values in product design-Kansei engineering in development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden.
24. Smith, A. M., Chapman, C. E., Deslandes, M., Langlais, J-S., & Thibodeau, M-P. (2002). Role of friction and tangential force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness. Experimental Brain Research, 144(2), 211-223.
25. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677-680.
26. Strazdiene, E., Gutauskas, M. (2005). New method for the objective evaluation of textile hand. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 13(2), 35-38.
27. Tiest, W. M. B., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2006). Analysis of haptic perception of materials by multidimensional scaling and physical measurements of roughness and compressibility. Acta Psychologica, 121(1), 1-20.