Perceptual and conceptual visual rhetoric: The case of symmetric object alignment

Metaphor and Symbol

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 155-173

  Schilperoord, Joost ^a   Maes, Alfons ^a   Ferdinandusse, Heleen ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950760368     PISSN: 10926488     EISSN: 15327868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10926480903028110     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arnheim, R. (1970). Visual thinking. London: Faber & Faber.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193-215.
4. Desmarais, G., Dixon, M. J., & Roy, E. A. (2007). A role for action knowledge in visual object identification. Memory & Cognition: 35(7), 1712-1723.
5. Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge.
6. Gibbs, R. W. (1992). Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review, 99, 572-577.
7. Giora, R., Heruti, V., Metuki, N., & Fein, O. (in press). "When we say no we mean no": Interpreting negation in vision and language. Journal of Pragmatics, 41.
8. Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 92-96.
9. Glucksberg, S., & Haught, C. (2006). On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind & Language, 21, 360-378.
10. Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3-18.
11. Groupe Mu. (1992). Traité du signe visuel. Pour une rhétorique de l'image. [Treatise on the visual sign. Towards a visual rhetoric]. Paris: Seuil.
12. Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. E. (2001). Category specificity in mind and brain? [Author's response]. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 497-510.
13. Jackendoff, R. S. (1987). On beyond zebra: The relation of linguistic and visual information. Cognition, 26, 89-114.
14. Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
15. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Langley, M. M., Cleary, A. M., Kostic, B. N., & Woods, J. A. (2008). Picture recognition without picture identification: A method for assessing the role of perceptual information in familiarity-based picture recognition. Acta Psychologica, 127(1), 103-113.
17. Maes, A., & Schilperoord, J. (2008). Classifying visual rhetoric. Conceptual and structural heuristics in interpreting and classifying visual rhetoric. In B. J. Phillips & E. F. McQuarrie (Eds.), Go figure: New directions in advertising rhetoric (pp. 227-253). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
18. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.
19. Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4(1/2), 113-136.
20. Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Schilperoord, J., & Cozijn, R. (in press). The representation and processing of fixed and compositional expressions.
22. Teng, N. Y., & Sun, S. (2002). Grouping, simile, and oxymoron in pictures: A design-based cognitive approach., 17, 295-316.
23. Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(2), 194-214.
24. Tsur, R. (1992). Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
25. Tversky, B. (2001). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 79-112). Cambridge, MAs: MIT Press.
26. Van Mulken, M. (2003). Analyzing rhetorical devices in print advertisements. Document Design, 4, 114-128.
27. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2006). The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(6), 1436-1450.
28. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt [Laws of organization in perceptual forms]. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301-350.