The Indigenous Vote in Ecuador's 2002 Presidential Election

Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 165-184

  Beck, Scott H ^a   Mijeski 1, Kenneth J ^a  

^a EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological Inference method; Ecuador; Elections; Ethnic parties; Indigenous movements; Indigenous parties; Pachakutik; Voting

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950754267     PISSN: 17442222     EISSN: 17442230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17442220600859338     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adolph, C, and King, G. 2003. Analyzing second-stage ecological regressions. Political Analysis, 11 (1):65–76.
2. Adolph, C, King, G, Herron, MC, and Shotts, KW. 2003. A consensus on second stage analyses in ecological inference models. Political Analysis, 11 (1):86–94.
3. Ayala Mora, E. 1989. Los Partidos Políticos en el Ecuador:Síntesis Histórica, Quito:Ediciones La Tierra.
4. Bebbington, A. 1992. De la protesta a la productividad:evolución de las federaciones indígenas del Ecuador. Desarrollo de base, 16 (2):11–21.
5. Beck, SH. 1998. paper presented to the South Eastern Council on Latin American Studies. 9–11 April1998. ‘Being an Indígena in Ecuador:the politics of ethnic identity,’, SECOLAS.
6. Beck, SH, and Mijeski, KJ. paper presented to the South Eastern Council on Latin American Studies. 6–8 March. ‘Ecuador's 2002 elections:implications for the indigenous movement,’, SECOLAS.
7. Beck, SH, and Mijeski, KJ. 1 September 2001. “ Barricades and ballots:Ecuador's Indians and the Pachakutik political movement ”. In Ecuadorian Studies/Estudios Ecuatorianos http://www.yachana.org/ecuatorianistas/journal/1/1.html
8. Becker, M. Paper presented at the Mid-America Conference on History. 17–19 September. ‘Nationalism and pluri-nationalism in a multi-ethnic state:indigenous organizations in Ecuador’
9. Becker, M. Paper presented at the International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association. 28–30 September. ‘Indigenismo and indian movements in twentieth-century Ecuador’
10. Burden, BC, and Kimball, DC. 1998. A new approach to the study of ticket splitting. American Political Science Review, 92:533–544. September
11. Cáceres, M. 1992. Crisis del Estado Nacional y Sociedad Plurinacional, Guaranda, Ecuador:Universidad Estatal de Bolívar.
12. Cervone, E. 1999. Los desafíos de la etnicidad:las luchas del movimiento indígena en la modernidad. Journal of Latin American Anthropology, 4 (1):46–73.
13. Collins, J. 2000. A sense of possibility:Ecuador's indigenous movement takes center stage. NACLA Report on the Americas, 33 (5):40–46.
14. Conaghan, CM. 1987. “ Party politics and democratization in Ecuador ”. In Authoritarians and Democrats:Regime Transition in Latin America, Edited by:Malloy, JM, and Seligson, MA. 145–163. Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press.
15. Conaghan, C. M, and Malloy, JM. 1994. Unsettling Statecraft:Democracy and Neoliberalism in the Central Andes, Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press.
16. Coppedge, M. 1998. “ The evolution of Latin American party systems ”. In Politics, Society, and Democracy:Latin America, Edited by:Mainwaring, S, and Valenzuela, A. 171–206. Boulder:Westview Press.
17. Corkill, D, and Cubbitt, D. 1988. Ecuador:Fragile Democracy, London:Latin American Bureau.
18. Dávalos, Pablo., 2004. Movimiento indígena, democracia, estado y plurinacionalidad en Ecuador. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, 10 (1):175–202. January–April
19. El Comercio. 2000. 21 de enero:la vorágine que acabó con Mahuad, Quito, Ecuador:El Comercio.
20. El Comercio. 21 February 2004. “ En las movilizaciones se evidenció la crisis de la Conaie ”. http://www.elcomercio.com/
21. El Comercio. 11 April2005. “ El sector indígena reconoce pérdida de credibilidad en el país ”. http://www.elcomercio.com
22. Guerrero, A. 1993. “ De sujetos indios a ciudadanos-étnicos:de la manifestación de 1961 al levantamiento indígena de 1990 ”. In Democracia, Etnicidad y Violencia Política en los Paises Andinos, Edited by:Degregori, C. 83–101. Lima, Peru:IEP/IFEA.
23. Herron, MC, and Shotts, KW. 2003a. Using ecological inference point estimates as dependent variables in second-stage linear regressions. Political Analysis, 11 (1):44–64.
24. Herron, MC, and Shotts, KW. 2003b. Cross-contamination in EI-R:reply. Political Analysis, 11 (1):77–85.
25. Hurtado, O. 1985. Political Power in Ecuador, Boulder:Westview Press.
26. King, G. 1997. A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem:Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data, Princeton:Princeton University Press.
27. Liu, B. 2001a. Racial contexts and white interests:beyond black threat and white tolerance. Political Behavior, 23:157–180. June
28. Liu, B. 2001b. The positive effect of black density on white crossover voting:reconsidering social interaction theory,. Social Science Quarterly, 82:602–615. September
29. Lluco, M. 2000. Personal interview, June
30. Lluco, M. 2000. Personal interview, June
31. Lublin, D, and Voss, DS. 2002. Context and francophone support for the sovereignty of Quebec:an ecological analysis,. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 35:75–101. March
32. Lucas, K. 2001. La Rebelión de los Indios, Quito:Abya Yala.
33. Macas, L. 1999. Los desafíos del movimiento indígena frente a la crisis. Boletín del Instituto Científico de Culturas Indígenas, 1 (1):1–5.
34. Macas, L. 2000. Personal interview, May
35. McDonald, RH, and Ruhl, JM. 1989. Party Politics and Elections in Latin America, Boulder:Westview Press.
36. Meisch, LA. 1994. “We will not dance on the tomb of our grandparents”:“500 years of resistance” in Ecuador. The Latin American Anthropological Review, 4 (2):55–74.
37. Mijeski, KJ, and Beck, SH. 2004. Ecuador's Indians in the 1996 and 1998 elections:assessing Pachakutik's performance. The Latin Americanist, XLVII (3&4):46–74. Winter/Spring
38. Mijeski, KJ, and Beck, SH. 2001. The state of Ecuador's indigenous movement:the view from above,. SECOLAS Annals, 33:70–86.
39. Murillo, M. 2002. personal interview, June
40. Núñez, J. 1995. “ La democracia en Ecuador:actualidad y perspectivas, ”. In La Democracia en América Latina:Actualidad y Perspectivas, Edited by:Casanova, P. González, and Rosenmann, MR. 285–323. Mexico:La Jornada Ediciones.
41. Rivera Vélez, F, and Ramírez Gallegos, F. 2005. “ Ecuador:democracy and economy in crisis ”. In The Andes in Focus:Security, Democracy and Economic Reform, Edited by:Crandall, R, Paz, G, and Roett, R. 183–228. Boulder:Lynne Rienner.
42. Pacari, N. 1996. Ecuador:taking on the neoliberal agenda. NACLA Report on the Americas, 29 (5):23–32.
43. Pallares, A. 2002. From Peasant Struggles to Indian Resistance:the Ecuadorian Andes in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, OK:University of Oklahoma Press.
44. Roberts, KM, and Wibbels, E. 1999. Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America:a test of economic, institutional and structural explanations. American Political Science Review, 93 (3):575–609.
45. Robinson, WS. 1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15:351–357.
46. Rubio, AO. 1954. Legislación Indigenista del Ecuador, Vol. 17, Ediciones Especiales, Mexico:Instituto Indigenista Interamericano.
47. Salazar, E. 1981. “ The Federación Shuar and the colonization frontier, ”. In Cultural Transformations in Modern Ecuador, Edited by:Whitten, NE. 589–613. Urbana:University of Illinois Press.
48. Talahua, G. 2003. personal interview, 11 August
49. Tamba, F. 1993. “ Las luchas de las comunidades indígenas en la zona de Olmedo, ”. In Historia de la Organización Indígena en Pichincha, 25–30. Quito:Abya-Yala. ed. Federación Indígena Pichincha Runacunapac Riccharimui
50. Tribunal Supremo Electoral. 2004. http://www.tse.gov.ec/resultados2004/
51. Van Cott, DL. 2000. Party system development and indigenous populations in Latin America:the Bolivian case. Party Politics, 6 (2):155–174.
52. Voss, DS. 2004. “ Using Ecological Inference for contextual research:when aggregation bias is the solution as well as the problem, ”. In Ecological Inference:New Methodological Strategies, Edited by:King, G. 69–96. New York:Cambridge University Press.
53. Voss, DS, and Lublin, D. 2001. Black incumbents, white districts:an appraisal of the 1996 congressional elections. American Politics Research, 29:141–182. March
54. Walsh, CE. 2001. “ The Ecuadorian political irruption:uprisings, coups, rebellions, and democracy, ”. In in Nepantla:Views From South, 173–204. Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
55. Weiss, W. 1999. From New Social Movements to Emergent Blocs:Coalitions and Power in Ecuador 1995–1996, Unpublished manuscript
56. Zamosc, L. 1994. Agrarian protest and the Indian movement in the Ecuadorian highlands,. Latin American Research Review, 29 (3):37–68.
57. Zamosc, L. 2004. “ The Indian movement in Ecuador:from politics of influence to politics of power, ”. In The Struggle for Indigenous Rights in Latin America, Edited by:Postero, NG, and Zamosc, L. 131–157. Brighton:Sussex Academic Press.
58. Zibechi, R. 2004. “ Dangerous liaisons:center-left governments and the grassroots ”. Americas Program, Interhemispheric Resource Center, 7 December, http://www.americaspolicy.org/reports/2004/0412movements.html