Predictors of non-adherence to the prescribed follow-up in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL);Preditores de não aderência ao seguimento preconizado para mulheres com lesão intraepitelial escamosa de alto grau (HSIL)

Saude e Sociedade

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 325-333

  do Nascimento, Maria Isabel ^a   Koifman, Rosalina Jorge ^b   Mattos, Inês Echemique ^b   Monteiro, Gina Torres Rego ^b  

^a Hospital Geral de Nova Iguaçu HGNI RJ   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adherence; Follow up; High squamous intraepithelial lesion; Uterine cervix

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950751334     PISSN: 01041290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-12902009000200015     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ABERCROMBIE, P. D. Improving adherence to abnormal Pap smears follow-up. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, v.30, n.1, p. 80-8, 2001.
2. BASTANI, R. et al. Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening. Cancer, v. 101, n. 5 suppl, p. 1188-200, 2004.
3. BINGHAM, A. et al. Factors affecting utilization of cervical cancer prevention services in low-resources settings. Salud Publica de México, v. 45, suppl 3, p. s408-16, 2003.
4. BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Assistência à Saúde. Instituto Nacional do Câncer. Câncer do colo do útero: informações técnicogerenciais e ações desenvolvidas. Rio de Janeiro, 2002.
5. COKER, A. L. et al. What predicts adherence to follow-up recommendations for abnormal Pap tests among older women? Ginecologic Oncology, v.105, p. 74-80, 2007.
6. EGGLESTON, K. S. et al. Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal pap test. Journal of Women's Health, v.16, n. 3, p. 311-30, 2007a.
7. EGGLESTON, K. S.; COKER, A. L.; LUCHOK K. J. Adherence to recommendations for follow-up to abnormal Pap tests. Obstetrics & Gynecology, v. 109, n. 6, p. 1332-41, june 2007b.
8. ELUF-NETO, J. e NASCIMENTO, C. M. Cervical cancer in Latin America. Seminars in Oncology, v. 28, n. 2, p. 188-197, 2001.
9. ENGELSTAD, L. P. et al. Abnormal pap smear follow- up in a high-risk population. Cancer Epidemiol, Biomarkers & Prevention, v. 10, p.1015-20, 2001.
10. ETHERINGTON, I. J. et al. Video colpography: a new technique for secondary cervical screening. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, v. 104, p.150-3, 1997.
11. FYLAN, F. Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behavior. British Journal of General Practice, v. 48, n. 433, p. 1509-14, 1998.
12. HARTZ, L. E.; FENAUGHTY, A. M. Management choice and adherence to follow-up after colposcopy in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1. Obstetrics & Gynecology, v. 98, n. 4, p. 674-9, 2001.
13. KHANNA, N. e PHILLIPS, M. Adherence to care plan in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a review of barriers and interventions. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, v. 14, p.123-30, 2001.
14. LINDAU, S. T.; BASU, A.; LEITSCH, A. S.; Health Literacy as a predictor of follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear: a prospective study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, v. 21, n. 8, p. 829-34, 2006.
15. MONNET, E. et al. Quality of follow-up of women with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL) cervical smears: results from a population-based organized screening programme. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, v. 113, n.2, p. 234-9, apr. 2004.
16. PASKETT, E. D.; PHILLIPS, K. C.; MILLER, M. E. Improving compliance among women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Obstetrics & Gynecology, v. 86, p. 353-9, 1995.
17. PEREIRA, C. R. N. et al. Human papillomavirus prevalence and predictors for cervical cancer among high-risk women from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, v. 17, p. 651-60, 2007.
18. QUADROS, C. A. T.; VICTORA, C. G.; COSTA, J. S. D. Coverage and focus of a cervical cancer prevention program in southern Brazil. Panamerican Journal of Public Health, v.16, n. 4, p. 223-32, 2004.
19. SANTIAGO, S. M.; ANDRADE, M. G. G. Avaliação de um programa de controle do câncer cérvico-uterino em rede local de saúde da Região Sudeste do Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 19, n. 2, p. 571-8, 2003.
20. TAKACS, P.; CHAKHTOURA, N.; DE SANTIS, T. Videocolposcopy improves adherence to follow-up compared to regular colposcopy: a randomized trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, v. 270, n. 3, p. 182-4, 2004.
21. VETRANO, G. et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: risk factors for persistence and recurrence in adolescents. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, v. 28, n.3, p.189-92, 2007.
22. YABROFF, K. R.; KERNER, J. F.; MANDELBLATT, J. S. Effectiveness of interventions to improve follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening. Preventive Medicine, v. 31, p. 429-39, 2000.
23. ZAPKA, J. G. et al. A framework for improving the Quality of Cancer Care: The case of breast and cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers & Prevention, v. 12, p. 4-13, 2003.
24. ZEFERINO, L. C. et al. Organization of cervical cancer screening in Campinas and surrounding region, São Paulo State, Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 22, n. 9, p.1909-14, 2006.