Metaphors in design problem solving: Implications for creativity

International Journal of Design

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 21-33

  Casakin, Hernan Pablo ^a  

^a ARIEL UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Architecture; Creativity; Design Problem Solving; Metaphors

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950703181     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Antoniades, A. (1992). Poetics of architecture: Theory of design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
2. Birk, M. (1998). Frank Lloyd Wright and the prairie. New York: Universe.
3. Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (1996). Creative design of the Lotus bicycle: Implications for knowledge support systems research. Design Studies, 17(1), 71-90.
4. Carter, P. (1999). Mies van der Rohe at work. Hong Kong: Phaidon.
5. Casakin, H. P. (2004). Metaphors in the design studio: Implications for education. In P. Lloyd, N. Roozenburg, C. McMahon, & L. Brodhurst (Eds.), Proceedings of 2nd International Engineering and Product Design Education Conference-The Changing Face of Design Education (pp. 265-273). Delft: Nivo Press.
6. Casakin, H. P. (2006). Assessing the use of metaphors in the design process. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(2), 253-268.
7. Casakin, H. P., & Kreitler, S. (2005a). The determinants of creativity: Flexibility in design. In P. Rodgers, L. Brodhurst, & D. Hepburn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Engineering & Product Design Education International Conference (pp. 303-307). London: Taylor & Francis.
8. Casakin, H. P., & Kreitler, S. (2005b). The nature of creativity in design: Factors for assessing individual creativity. In J. S. Gero, & N. Bonnardel (Eds.), Proceedings of International Workshop on Studying Designers (pp. 87-100). Sydney: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
9. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glasser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121-152.
10. Colquhoun, A. (2002). Modern architecture. Oxford: University Press.
11. Coyne, R. (1995). Designing information technology in the postmodern age: From method to metaphor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
12. Coyne, R. (1997). Creativity as commonplace. Design Studies, 18(2), 135-141.
13. Cross, N. (1997). Descriptive models of creative design: Application to an example. Design Studies, 18(4), 427-455.
14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity-Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
15. Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.
16. Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199-253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Gero, J. S. (2000a). Computational models of innovative and creative design processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 64(2-3), 183-196.
19. Gero, J. S. (2000b). Creativity, emergence, and evolution in design. Knowledge Based Systems, 9(7), 435-448.
20. Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Guilford, J. P. (1981). Potentiality for creativity. In J. C. Gowan, J. Khatena, & E. P. Torance (Eds.), Creativity: Its educational implications (2nd ed., pp. 1-5). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
22. Hanna, R., & Barber, T. (2001). An inquiry into computers in design: Attitudes before-attitudes after. Design Studies, 22(3), 255-281.
23. Heap, J. (1989). The management of innovation and design. London: Cassell.
24. Hsiao, S., & Chou, J. (2004). A creativity-based design process for innovative product design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 34(5), 421-443.
25. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Lawson, B. R. (2004). Schemata, gambits and precedent: Some factors in design expertise. Design Studies, 25(5), 443-457.
29. Lesgold, A. (1991). Problem-solving. In R. Stemberg, & E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 188-213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Levine, N. (1996). The architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Medin, D., & Ross, B. (1990). Cognitive psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
32. Milgram, R., & Arad, R. (1981). Ideational fluency as a predictor of original problem-solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 568-572.
33. Milgram, R., & Davidovich, N. (2006). Creative thinking as a predictor of teacher effectiveness at three levels: Elementary, secondary, and higher education. In Proceedings of the 26th International Congress of Applied Psychology [CD-ROM]. Athens, Greece.
34. Nagai, Y., & Taura, T. (2006). Formal description of conceptsynthesizing process for creative design. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition (pp.443-460). Berlin: Springer.
35. Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem-solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36. Ortony, A. (1991). Metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Rowe, P. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Rubinstein, G. (2003). Authoritarism and its relation to creativity: A comparative study among students of design, behavioral sciences and law. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 695-705.
39. Schön, D. (1983). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. London: Temple Smith.
40. Snodgrass, A., & Coyne, R. (1992). Models, metaphors and the hermeneutics of designing. Design Issues, 9(1), 56-74.
41. Suwa, M., Gero, J. S., & Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and s-inventions of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies, 21(6), 539-567.
42. Ward, A. (1990). Ideology, culture and the design studio. Design Studies, 11(1), 10-16.