Academia, surveillance, and the fbi: A short history

Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance

Volumn 10, Issue , 2008, Pages 151-174

  White, Scott G ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950695319     PISSN: 15216136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1521-6136(07)00207-2     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. ALA. (2007a). ALA core values statement. From corevaluesstatement/ corevalues.htm. http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/statementspols/Retrieved August 4, 2007.
2. ALA. (2007b). The freedom to read statement. Retrieved August 27, 2007, from http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/statementspols/ftrstatement/ freedomreadstatement.htm
3. ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union. (2002). How the USA Patriot Act expands law enforcement ''sneak and peek'' warrants. Privacy and Technology: General Bulletin
4. March 7. From http://www.aclu.org/Privacy/Privacy.cfm?ID=9769&C=39. Retrieved December 6, 2002.
5. Adas, J. (2002). New York Congressman Nadler calls USA Patriot Act extreme danger to civil rights. Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, 21(6), 57.
6. Albitz, B. (2005). Dude, we are my civil rights? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31, 284-286.
7. Babson, J., Lebowitz, L. &Viglucci, A. (2001). Terrorist tickets booked in library. Courier Mail, News, September 19, p. 7. Retrieved March 11, 2003, from Lexis/Nexis database
8. Badash, L. (2000). Science and McCarthyism. Minerva, 38, 53-80.
9. Badash, L. (2003). From security blanket to security risk: Scientists in the decade after Hiroshima. History and Technology, 19(3), 241-256.
10. Baker, N. V. (2002). The law: The impact of antiterrorism policies on separation of powers - Assessing John Ashcroft's role. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 765-778.
11. Blackstock, N. (1988). COINTELPRO: The FBI's secret war on political freedom. New York: Pathfinder.
12. Brasol, B. (1969). The elements of crime: Psycho-social interpretation. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.
13. Carson, B. M. (2006). Legally speaking - John Doe and the Patriot Act. Against the Grain, 18(4), 70-72.
14. Chang, N. (2001). The USA Patriot Act: What's so patriotic about trampling on the Bill of Rights? From . Retrieved August 18, 2007. http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/reports/docs/USA-PATRIOT-ACT.pdf
15. Clymer, A. (2002). Threats and responses: privacy; librarians get advice on handling government requests for information on readers. New York Times, December 12, A30.
16. Cohen, H., &Minow, M. (2006). Intellectual freedom in libraries: Then and now. Advances in Librarianship, 30, 73-101.
17. Cole, D. (2003). Enemy aliens, double standards and constitutional freedoms in the war on terror. New York: The New Press.
18. Cowan, A. L. (2006). Librarian is still John Doe, despite Patriot Act revision. The New York Times, March 21, p. B3.
19. Davis, J. K. (1992). Spying on America: The FBI's counterintelligence program. Westport, CT: Praeger.
20. Davis, J. K. (1997). Assault on the Left: The FBI and the sixties antiwar movement. Westport, CT: Praeger.
21. Directors, Then and Now. (2007). Federal Bureau of Investigations website. From http://www.fbi.gov/libref/directors/hoover.htm
22. Doyle, C. (2002). The USA Patriot Act: A Sketch. CRS Report for Congress, Order code RS21203, April 18. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress: Washington, DC.
23. Doyle, C. (2005). USA Patriot Act: Background and comparison of House- and Senate-approved reauthorization and related legislative action. CRS Report for Congress, Order code RL33027, August 9, 2005. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress: Washington, D.C.
24. Fallis, D. S., &Cha, A. E. (2001). Agents following suspects' lengthy electronic trail; Web of connections used to plan attack. Washington Post, Final Edition, October 4, p. A24.
25. Foerstel, H. N. (1991). Surveillance in the stacks: The FBI's library awareness program. New York: Greenwood Press.
26. Foerstel, H. N. (1999). Freedom of information and the right to know: The origins and applications of the Freedom of Information Act. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
27. Foerstel, H. N. (2004). Refuge of a scoundrel: The Patriot Act in libraries. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
28. Fuchs, R. F. (1963). Academic freedom: Its basic philosophy, function, and history. Law and Contemporary Problems, 28(3), 431-446.
29. Gellman, B. (2005). The FBI's secret scrutiny: In hunt for terrorists, bureau examines records of ordinary Americans. The Washington Post, November 6, p. A01.
30. Gentry, C. (1991). J. Edgar Hoover: The man and the secrets. New York: Norton.
31. Hoffman, B. (1998). Inside terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.
32. Jaeger, P. T., Bertot, J. C., &McClure, C. R. (2003). The impact of the USA Patriot Act on collection and analysis of personal information under the foreign intelligence surveillance act. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 295-314.
33. Jaeger, P. T., McClure, C. R., Bertot, J. C., &Snead, J. T. (2004). The USA Patriot Act, the foreign intelligence surveillance act, and information policy research in libraries: Issues, impacts and questions for libraries and researchers. The Library Quarterly, 74, 99-121.
34. Jerome, F. (2003). The Einstein file: J. Edgar Hoover's secret war against the world's most famous scientist. New York: St. Martin's Press.
35. Johnson, L. K. (1988). A season of inquiry, congress and intelligence. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
36. Johnson, L. K. (2004). Congressional supervision of America's secret agencies: The experience and legacy of the Church committee. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 3-14.
37. Keen, M. F. (2004). Stalking sociologists: J. Edgar Hoover's FBI surveillance of American sociology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
38. Kessler, R. (2003). The bureau: The secret history of the FBI. New York: St. Martin's Press.
39. Klinefelter, A. (2004). The role of librarians in challenges to the USA Patriot Act. North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology, 5(2), 219-226.
40. Kniffel, L. (2002). USA Patriot Act raises red flag over liberties. American Libraries, 33(1), 20.
41. Lesser, I. O. (1999). Countering the new terrorism. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
42. Levin, B. (2007). Trials for terrorists. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 195-218.
43. Lichtman, R. M. (2004). Louis Budenz, the FBI, and the ''list of 400 concealed communists'': An extended tale of McCarthy-era informing. American Communist History, 3, 25-54.
44. Martorella, G. (2006). Libraries in the aftermath of 9/11. The Reference Librarian, 94, 109-137.
45. Mazzetti, M., &Williams, M. (2007). In tribunal statement, confessed plotter of September 11 burnishes image as a soldier. New York Times, March 16, p. A15.
46. McFadden, R. (1987). F.B.I. in New York asks librarians' aid in reporting on spies. New York Times, September 18, p. A1.
47. Minow, M. (2002). The USA Patriot Act. Library Journal, 127(16), 52.
48. O'Connor, A. (2006). Librarians win as U.S. Relents on secrecy law. The New York Times, April 13, p. B1.
49. Oder, N. (2006). Gag order on ''John Doe'' lifted. Library Journal, 131(8), 22.
50. Osher, S. A. (2002). Privacy, computers and the Patriot Act: The fourth amendment isn't dead, but no one will insure it. Florida Law Review, 54, 521-542.
51. Phillips, H. (2005). Libraries and national security law: An examination of the USA Patriot Act. Progressive Libraries, 25, 28-42.
52. Pike, G. H. (2007). The Patriot Act illuminated. Information Today, 24(5), 17-18.
53. Powers, R. G. (1987). Secrecy and power: The life of J. Edgar Hoover. New York: Free Press.
54. Powers, R. G. (2004). Broken: The troubled past and uncertain future of the FBI. New York: The Free Press.
55. Pressley, S., &Blum, J. (2001). Hijackers may have accessed computers at public libraries; Authorities investigating possible Internet communications. The Washington Post, September 17, p. A4.
56. Price, D. H. (2004). Threatening anthropology: McCarthyism and the FBI's surveillance of activist anthropologists. Durham: Duke University Press.
57. Privacy and Security. (2003, February 3). Editorial. San Francisco Chronicle, p. D4. Retrieved March 13, from Lexis/Nexis Academic Universe.
58. Puzzanghera, J. (2002). Terrorist's Internet use may betray them; FBI is following up on tracks they left behind. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, News, September 21, p. 14A. Retrieved March 10, 2003, from Lexis/Nexis Academic Universe.
59. Raab, C. (2006). Fighting terrorism in an electronic age: does the Patriot Act unduly compromise our civil liberties. Duke Law and Technology Review, 3. From http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2006dltr0003. html. Retrieved August 9, 2007.
60. Rabban, D. M. (1990). A functional analysis of ''Individual'' and ''Institutional'' academic freedom under the first amendment. Law and Contemporary Problems, 53(3), 227-301.
61. Rackow, S. H. (2002). How the USA Patriot Act will permit governmental infringement upon the privacy of Americans in the name of ''intelligence'' investigations. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 150, 1651-1696.
62. Rauch, J. (1955). Area institute programs an African studies. The Journal of Negro Education, 24(Fall), 409-425.
63. Reynolds, T. (2002). Collateral damage: Information, intellectual freedom, and the war on terrorism. Alki, 18, 28-30.
64. Rodriguez, C. D. (2001). Preserving the balance between security and liberty, October 17. FDCH Press Release.
65. Rosenbaum, D. (2001). A nation challenged: questions of confidentiality; Competing principles leave some professionals debating responsibility to government. The New York Times, November 23, p. 7B. Retrieved March 22, 2007 from Lexis/Nexis Academic Universe.
66. Schulhofer, S. J. (2002). The enemy within: Intelligence gathering, law enforcement, and civil liberties in the wake of September 11. New York: The Century Foundation Press.
67. Solove, D. J. (2004). Reconstructing electronic surveillance law. George Washington Law Review, 72, 1701-1747.
68. Stielow, F. (1993). The FBI and library spying: A World War II precedent. American Libraries, 24(8), 709-711.
69. Strickland, L. S. (2002). Information and the war against terror, III: New Information-related laws and the impact on civil liberties. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 28(3), 23-27.
70. Strickland, L. S. (2003). Civil liberties vs. intelligence collection: Foreign intelligence surveillance act speaks in court. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 1-12.
71. Swire, P. P. (2005). Reply: Section 214. Pen register and trap and trace authority under FISA; section 215. Access to business recods under FISA. In: S. A. Baker &J. Kavanagh (Eds)), Patriot debates: Experts debate the USA Patriot Act. Chicago: ABA Publishing.
72. Taylor, H. (2001). Overwhelming public support for increasing surveillance powers. The Harris Poll, #49, October 3, 2001. From www.harrisinteractive.com. Retrieved November 15, 2002.
73. Wallace, M. (2003). The American axis: Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, and the rise of the Third Reich. New York: St. Martin's Press.
74. Warwick, S. (2005). Will the academy survive 9/11? Scholarship, security and United States government policy. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 573-593.
75. Woolston, H. (1942). Free speech in wartime. American Sociological Review, 7(2), 185-193.
76. Zanini, M. (1999). Middle Eastern terrorism and netwar. Studies in Conflict &Terrorism, 2(3), 247-256.