Using linguistic techniques for schema matching

ICSOFT 2006 - 1st International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, Proceedings

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 115-120

  Unal, Ozgul ^a   Afsarmanesh, Hamideh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Collaborative networks; Linguistic matching; Schema matching

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC GENERATION; COLLABORATIVE NETWORK; COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS; DATABASE SCHEMAS; INTEGRATION SYSTEMS; LINGUISTIC TECHNIQUES; SCHEMA MATCHING; SCHEMAS; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; SIMILARITY METRICS;

BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; SEMANTICS; SYNTACTICS;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 77950691045     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. ENBI (2005). European Network for Biodiversity Information (IST 2001-00618). http://www.enbi.info.
2. Camarinha-Matos, L. M. and H. Afsarmanesh (2005). Collaborative networks: A new scientific discipline. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 16(4-5): 439-452.
3. Cleverdon, C. W. and E. M. Keen (1966). Factors determining the performance of indexing systems, vol 2: Test results, Aslib Cranfield Research Project. Cranfield Institute of Technology.
4. Do, H. H. and E. Rahm (2002). COMA - A System for Flexible Combination of Schema Matching Approaches. In 28th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB
5. Doan, A., J. Madhavan, et al. (2002). Learning to Map between Ontologies on the Semantic Web. In World- Wide Web Conf. (WWW-2002).
6. Fellbaum, C. (1998). An Electronic Lexical Database., Cambridge: MIT press.
7. Jaccard, P. (1912). The distribution of flora in the alpine zone. The New Phytologist 11(2): 37-50.
8. Jaro, M. A. (1995). Probabilistic linkage of large public health. Statistics in Medicine: 14:491-498.
9. Lesk, M. (1986). Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: how to tell a pine code from an ice cream cone. In 5th SIGDOC Conference.
10. Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Cybernetics and Control Theory 10(8): 707-710.
11. Madhavan, J., P. A. Bernstein, et al. (2001). Generic Schema Matching with Cupid. In 27th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB).
12. Melnik, S., H. Garcia-Molina, et al. (2002). Similarity Flooding: A Versatile Graph Matching Algorithm and its Application to Schema Matching. In 18th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).
13. Miller, R. J., L. M. Haas, et al. (2000). Schema Mapping as Query Discovery. In 26th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB).
14. Mitra, P., G. Wiederhold, et al. (2001). A scalable framework for the interoperation of information sources. International Semantic Web Working Symposium.
15. Monge, A. E. and C. Elkan (1996). The Field Matching Problem: Algorithms and Applications. In 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
16. Pedersen, T., S. Banerjee, et al. (2003). Maximizing Semantic Relatedness to Perform Word Sense Disambiguation. Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota.
17. Rijsbergen, C. J. v. (1979). Information Retrieval, Butterworths, London.
18. Salton, G. and C. S. Yang (1973). On the specification of term values in automatic indexing. Journal of Documentation(29): 351-372.
19. Unal, O. and H. Afsarmanesh (2006). Interoperability in Collaborative Network of Biodiversity Organizations. In Proc. of PRO-VE'06 - Virtual Enterprises and Collaborative Networks, Accepted for Publication.
20. Wu, Z. and M. Palmer (1994). Verb Semantics and Lexical Selection. 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.