Exploring best-fit hazard functions and lifetime regression models for urban weekend activities: Case study

Journal of Transportation Engineering

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 255-266

  Zhong, Ming ^a   Hunt, John Douglas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Regression models; Transportation models; Travel demand; Travel patterns

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE COMPONENTS; ACTIVITY DURATION; ACTIVITY PARTICIPATION; ACTIVITY PATTERNS; ACTIVITY-BASED; ALBERTA; CALGARY; DEMOGRAPHIC GROUPS; FUTURE APPLICATIONS; HAZARD FUNCTION; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TESTS; NON-PARAMETRIC; PARAMETRIC MODELS; PERSONAL MOBILITY; REGRESSION MODEL; ROUNDING PROBLEM; SEMIPARAMETRIC MODELS; SIGNIFICANT FACTORS; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; TRANSPORTATION MODEL; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL DEMAND; TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING; TRAVEL PATTERNS;

HAZARDS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; PLANNING; RESEARCH; TRANSPORTATION;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

FORECASTING METHOD; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL DEMAND; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; URBAN AREA;

ALBERTA; CALGARY; CANADA;

EID: 77950687654     PISSN: 0733947X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2010)136:3(255)     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allison ML, Srinivasan S, Bhat CR. An exploratory analysis of weekend activity patterns in the San Francisco Bay Area. Proc., 84th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2005, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
2. Bhat CR. Duration modeling. Handbook of transport modelling 2000, 91-111. D. A. Hensher, K. J. Button, eds., Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.
3. Bhat CR, Lockwood A. On distinguishing between physically active and physically passive episodes and between travel and activity episodes: An analysis of weekend recreational participation in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract. 2004, 38(8):573-592. TRPPEC, 0965-8564, 10.1016/j.tra.2004.04.002.
4. Bhat CR, Srinivasan S. A multidimensional mixed ordered-response model for analyzing weekend activity participation. Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol. 2005, 39(3):255-278. TRBMDY, 0191-2615, 10.1016/j.trb.2004.04.002.
5. Chu YL. Modeling workers' daily non-work activity participation and duration. Proc., 84th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2005, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
6. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 1972, 34:187-220. JSTBAJ, 0035-9246.
7. D'Agostino RB, Stephens MA. Goodness-of-fit techniques 1986, Marcel Dekker, New York.
8. Doherty ST, Lee-Gosselin M, Burns K, Andrey J. Household activity rescheduling in response to automobile reduction scenarios. Transp. Res. Rec. 2002, 1807:174-181. TRREDM, 0361-1981, 10.3141/1807-21.
9. Ettema D, Borgers A, Timmermans H. Simulation model of activity scheduling behaviour. Transp. Res. Rec. 1995, 1413:1-11. TRREDM, 0361-1981.
10. Traffic congestion and reliability: Linking solutions to problems. 2004a, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), FHWA, U.S. DOT, (Dec. 6, 2006), http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/congestion_report_04/congestion_report.pdf.
11. 2001 national household transportation survey. 2004b, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), FHWA, U.S. DOT, (Nov. 18, 2006), http://nhts.ornl.gov/2001/pub/STT.pdf.
12. Gärling T, Kwan MP, Golledge RG. Computational-process modelling of household activity scheduling. Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol. 1994, 28(5):355-364. TRBMDY, 0191-2615, 10.1016/0191-2615(94)90034-5.
13. Gavaghan DJ, Moore AR, McQay HJ. An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analysis in pain using simulations of patient data. Pain 2000, 85:415-424. ZZZZZZ, 0304-3959, 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00302-4.
14. Gilbert C. A duration model of automobile ownership. Transp. Res. 1992, 26(2):97-114. TRREBK, 0041-1647, 10.1016/0191-2615(92)90001-D.
15. Hamed MM, Easa SM. Integrated modeling of urban shopping activities. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 1998, 124(3):115-131. JUPDDM, 0733-9488, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1998)124:3(115).
16. Hamed MM, Mannering FL. Modeling travelers' postwork activity involvement: Toward a new methodology. Transp. Sci. 1993, 27(4):381-394. TRSCBJ, 0041-1655, 10.1287/trsc.27.4.381.
17. Hensher DA, Mannering FL. Hazard-based duration models and their application to transport analysis. Transport Rev. 1994, 14(1):63-82. ZZZZZZ, 0033-8974, 10.1080/01441649408716866.
18. Higgins JP T, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327:557-560. ZZZZZZ, 0959-8138, 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
19. Hunt JD, Atkins DM. Characteristics of weekend travel in Calgary. Proc., Transportation Revolutions: Proc. of the 39th Annual Conf. of the Canadian Transportation Research Forum 2004, Canadian Transportation Research Forum (CTRF), Calgary, Canada.
20. Hunt JD, Stefan K, McMillan P. Microsimulating weekend travel by households in Calgary. Proc., 2005 Transportation Association of Canada Conf. 2005, Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), Calgary, Canada.
21. Kitamura R. Applications of models of activity behavior for activity based demand forecasting. Proc., Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conf. 1996, USDOT, New Orleans.
22. Lawless JF. Statistical models and methods for lifetime data 2003, Wiley, Hoboken, N.J.
23. Lewis PA W. Distribution of the Anderson-Darling statistic. Ann. Math. Stat. 1961, 32(4):1118-1124. AASTAD, 0003-4851, 10.1214/aoms/1177704850.
24. Lockwood AM, Srinivasan S, Bhat CR. An exploratory analysis of weekend activity patterns in the San Francisco Bay Area. Proc., 84th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2005, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
25. Mannering FL, Hamed MM. Occurrence, frequency, and duration of commuters' work-to-home departure delay. Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol. 1990, 24(2):99-109. TRBMDY, 0191-2615, 10.1016/0191-2615(90)90022-Q.
26. Miller EJ, Roorda MJ. Prototype model of household activity/travel scheduling. Transp. Res. Rec. 2003, 1831:114-121. TRREDM, 0361-1981, 10.3141/1831-13.
27. Mohammadian A, Doherty ST. A hazard model for the duration of time between planning and execution of an activity. Proc., Conf. on Progress in Activity-Based Analysis 2004, International Conference on Recent Advances in Retailing and Services Science (EIRASS), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
28. Nam D, Mannering F. An exploratory hazard-based analysis of highway incident duration. Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract. 2000, 34:85-102. TRPPEC, 0965-8564, 10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00065-2.
29. Comparative analysis, weekday and weekend travel with NPTS integration for the RT-HIS: Regional travel-household interview survey. 2000, Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) Quade and Douglas, Inc., Rep. Prepared for the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council and the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority, Inc.
30. Paselk TA, Mannering FL. Use of duration models for predicting vehicular delay at a US/Canadian border crossing. Transportation 1994, 21:249-270. TRPOB6, 0049-4488, 10.1007/BF01099213.
31. Sall EA, Bhat CR, Reckinger J. An analysis of weekend work activity patterns in the San Francisco Bay Area. Proc., 84th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2005, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
32. Stathopoulos A, Karlaftis MG. Modeling duration of urban traffic congestion. J. Transp. Eng. 2002, 128(6):587-590. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:6(587).
33. Wang WQ, Chen HB, Bell M. A study of the characteristics of traffic incident duration on motorways. Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Traffic and Transportation Studies 2002, 1101-1108. ASCE, Reston, Va.
34. Washington S, Karlaftis M, Mannering F. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis 2003, CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.