Semantic integration of collection description: Combining CIDOC/CRM and dublin core collections application profile

D-Lib Magazine

Volumn 15, Issue 7-8, 2009, Pages

  Lourdi, Irene ^a,b   Papatheodorou, Christos ^a,c   Doerr, Martin ^d  

^a IONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^c Athena Research Centre   (Greece)

^d INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950675337     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10829873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1045/july2009-papatheodorou     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allen, S.M. 2002. Nobody knows You're a dog (or library, or museum, or archive) on the internet: The convergence of three cultures. Proceedings of the 68th IFLA General Conference and Council, Glasgow - Scotland.
2. Amann, B., I. Fundulaki, M. Scholl, C. Beeri, and A-m. Vercoustre. 2001. Mapping XML fragments to community web ontologies. Proceedings Fourth International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB'2001).
3. Amann, B., C. Beeri, I. Fundulaki, and M. Scholl. 2002 Ontology-Based Integration of XML Web Resources Source, Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference on The Semantic Web, Sardinia, Italy, June 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Eds Springer, 117-131. .
4. Buckland, M. 1992. Redesigning library services: A manifesto. Chicago: American Library Association, ISBN-0-8389-0590-0.
5. Crofts, N., M. Doerr and T. Gill. 2003. The CIDOC conceptual reference model: A standard for communicating cultural contents. Cultivate Interactive, 9. Available at .
6. Cruz, I.F., X. Huiyong, and H. Feihong. 2004. An ontology-based framework for XML semantic integration. Proceedings of the 8th International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium, Coimbra, Portugal, Coimbra, Portugal. IEEE Computer Society, 217-226. .
7. Cruz, I.F. and H. Xiao. 2005. The role of ontologies in data integration. Engineering Intelligent Systems, 13(4): 245-52. Available at .
8. Day, M. 1996. Metadata: Mapping between metadata formats. in UKOLN: The UK Office for Library and Information Networking. Available from .
9. Dawson, F. and T. Howes, 1998. RFC 2426 - vCard MIME Directory Profile, .
10. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). 1990. "Knowledge Sharing Effort (KSE)", Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, .
11. Doerr, M. 2003. The CIDOC conceptual reference module an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine, 24(3): 75-92. Available at .
12. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, "Dublin Core Metadata Glossary", Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, .
13. Dublin Core Collection Description Task Group, "Dublin Core Collections Application Profile", Dublin Core Collection Description Task Group, .
14. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, "Dublin Core Metadata Element Set", Version 1.1, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, .
15. Foulonneau, M., T. Cole, T. Habing, and S. Shreeves. 2005. Using collection descriptions to enhance an aggregation of harvested item-level metadata. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, Denver, Colorado, USA. .
16. Gill, T. 2004. Building semantic bridges between museums, libraries and archives: The CIDOC conceptual reference model. First Monday, 9(5). Available at .
17. Hakala, H. 2005. Collection mapping: Models and standards for international cooperation. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Collection Mapping, Helsinki, Finland. Available at .
18. Heaney, M. 2000. An analytical model of collections and their catalogues, UKOLN: The UK Office for Library and Information Networking. Available at .
19. Hong, B., L. Hongzhe, Y. Jiehua, and X. Hongwei. 2005. An ontology-based semantic integration for digital museums. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web-Age Information Management (WAIM 2005), Hangzhou, China. October 2005, Eds. Springer, 626-631. .
20. Hunter J. 2002, Combining the CIDOC CRM and MPEG-7 to Describe Multimedia in Museums, Proceedings of the Museums and the Web international conference, Boston, April 2002.
21. ICOM/CIDOC Documentation Standards Group and CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group, "Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model". Available at .
22. Kakali, C., I. Lourdi, T. Stasinopoulou, L. Bountouri, C. Papatheodorou, M. Doerr, and M. Gergatsoulis. 2007. Integrating Dublin Core metadata for cultural heritage collections using ontologies. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications (DC 2007), Singapore. Available at .
23. Kondylakis, H., D. Martin, and D. Plexousakis. 2006. Mapping language for information integration. Greece: Institute of Computer Science, Foundation of Research and Technology, 385. Available at .
24. Lagoze, C. and D. Fielding. 1998. Defining collections in distributed digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine (November 1998). doi:10.1045/november98-lagoze.
25. Lagoze, C., W. Arms, S. Gan, D. Hillmann, C. Ingram, D. Krafft, R. Marisa et al. 2002. Core services in the architecture of the national science digital library (NSDL). Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, Portland, Oregon, USA, ACM, 201-209. .
26. Lee, H. -L. 2000. What is a collection? Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(12). 3.0.CO;2-T>.
27. Lehti, P. and P. Bankhauser. 2004. XML data integration with OWL: Experiences & challenges. Paper presented at The Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT'04), Tokyo, Japan. .
28. Library of Congress, "Encoded Archival Description", Library of Congress, .
29. Lively, L. 1996. Managing information overload. New York: AMACOM.
30. MIT Libraries, "Metadata Reference Guide", MIT Libraries, .
31. Nam, Y-K., J. Coguen, and G. Wang. 2002. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, Proceedings of the Confederated International Conferences DOA, CoopIS and ODBASE 2002, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Lecture Notes on Computer Science, 2519, 1332-1344. .
32. National Information Standards Organization, "ANSI/NISO Z39.91 - 200x Collection Description Specification - DSFTU", National Information Standards Organization, .
33. Pierre, St M. and W. LaPlant, Jr. 1998. Issues in crosswalking content metadata standards. In NISO press. Available at .
34. Powell, A. RSLP collection description schema: Collection description schema. Available from .
35. Rajasekar, A., R., R. Moore, B. Ludascher, and I. Zaslavsky. 2002. The GRID adventures: SDSC's storage resource broker and web services in digital library applications. Proceedings of the Fourth All-Russian Scientific Conference RCDL'2002 Digital Libraries: Advanced Methods and Technologies, Digital Collections, Dubna, Russia. Vol 1/2.
36. Renear, A.H., K. Wickett, R. Urban, D. Dubin, and S. Shreeves. 2008. Collection/Item metadata relationships. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, Germany, September 2008. Available at .
37. Stasinopoulou, T., L. Bountouri, C. Kakali, I. Lourdi, C. Papatheodorou, M. Doerr, and M. Gergatsoulis. 2007. Ontology-based metadata integration in the cultural heritage domain. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, Hanoi, Vietnam. Springer-Verlag, 165-175. .
38. Tous, R., and J. Delgado. 2006. Contorsion: A semantic XPath processor. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Database Interoperability (InterDB 2005), Namur, Belgium, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 150(2) (3/23): 87-102. .
39. Wilson, P. 1996. Interdisciplinary research and information overload. Library Trends, 45(2): 192-203. Available from .
40. Woodley, M. 2000. Crosswalks: The path to universal access In Introduction to metadata: Pathways to digital information. Getty Information Institute.