Dynamics based alignment of proteins: An alternative approach to quantify dynamic similarity

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Münz, Márton ^a   Lyngsø, Rune ^a   Hein, Jotun ^a   Biggin, Philip C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACKBONE DYNAMICS; DYNAMIC MOTIONS; DYNAMIC SIMILARITIES; HIGHLY-CORRELATED; MOLECULAR MOTIONS; PROTEIN DYNAMICS; STRUCTURAL ALIGNMENTS; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY;

DATA REDUCTION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION;

PROTEINS;

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 77950667485     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-188     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Dodson G, Verma CS. Protein flexibility: Its role in structure and mechanism revealed by molecular simulations. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 2006, 63(2):207-219. 10.1007/s00018-005-5236-7, 16389462.
2. Teilum K, Olsen JG, Kragelund BB. Functional aspects of protein flexibility. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 2009, 1-17.
3. Boehr DD, Dyson HJ, Wright PE. An NMR perspective on enzyme dynamics. Chemical Reviews 2006, 106(8):3055-3079. 10.1021/cr050312q, 16895318.
4. Henzler-Wildman KA, Lei M, Thai V, Kerns SJ, Karplus M, Kern D. A hierarchy of timescales in protein dynamics is linked to enzyme catalysis. Nature 2007, 450(7171):913-916. 10.1038/nature06407, 18026087.
5. Hammes-Schiffer S, Benkovic SJ. Relating protein motion to catalysis. Annual Review of Biochemistry 2006, 75:519-541. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142800, 16756501.
6. Smock RG, Gierasch LM. Sending signals dynamically. Science 2009, 324(5924):198-203. 10.1126/science.1169377, 19359576.
7. Ma J. Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular complexes. Structure 2005, 13:373-380. 10.1016/j.str.2005.02.002, 15766538.
8. Hall BA, Kaye SL, Pang A, Perera R, Biggin PC. Characterization of Protein Conformational States by Normal-Mode Frequencies. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129(37):11394-11401. 10.1021/ja071797y, 17715919.
9. Keskin O, Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behaviour. Biophys J 2000, 78:2093-2106. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76756-7, 1300801, 10733987.
10. Karplus M, Kuriyan J. Molecular dynamics and protein function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(19):6679-6685. 10.1073/pnas.0408930102, 1100762, 15870208.
11. Karplus M, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Biol 2002, 9:646-652. 10.1038/nsb0902-646, 12198485.
12. Cox K, Sansom MSP. One membrane protein, two structures and six environments: A comparative molecular dynamics simulation study of the bacterial outer membrane protein PagP. Molecular Membrane Biology 2009, 26(4):205-214. 10.1080/09687680902788967, 19280380.
13. Lama D, Sankararamakrishnan R. Anti-apoptotic Bcl-XL protein in complex with BH3 peptides of pro-apoptotic Bak, Bad, and Bim proteins: Comparative molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics 2008, 73(2):492-514.
14. Yaneva R, Springer S, Zacharias M. Flexibility of the MHC class II peptide binding cleft in the bound, partially filled, and empty states: A molecular dynamics simulation study. Biopolymers 2009, 91(1):14-27. 10.1002/bip.21078, 18767126.
15. Zacharias M, Springer S. Conformational flexibility of the MHC Class alpha1-alpha2 domain in peptide bound and free states: A molecular dynamics simulation study. Biophysical Journal 2004, 87(4):2203-2214. 10.1529/biophysj.104.044743, 1304646, 15454423.
16. Pang A, Arinaminpathy Y, Sansom MSP, Biggin PC. Comparative Molecular Dynamics: Similar folds and similar motions?. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2005, 61:809-822.
17. Papaleo E, Riccardi L, Villa C, Fantucci P, De Gioia L. Flexibility and enzymatic cold-adaptation: A comparative molecular dynamics investigation of the elastase family. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Proteins and Proteomics 2006, 1764(8):1397-1406.
18. Spiwok V, Lipovová P, Skálová T, Dusková J, Dohnálek J, Hasek J, Russell NJ, Králová B. Cold-active enzymes studied by comparative molecular dynamics simulation. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2007, 13(4):485-497. 10.1007/s00894-006-0164-5, 17235516.
19. Maguid S, Fernandez-Alberti S, Ferrelli L, Echave J. Exploring the common dynamics of homologous proteins. Application to the globin family. Biophysical Journal 2005, 89(1):3-13. 10.1529/biophysj.104.053041, 1366528, 15749782.
20. Carnevale V, Raugei S, Micheletti C, Carloni P. Convergent dynamics in the protease enzymatic superfamily. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128:9766-9772. 10.1021/ja060896t, 16866533.
21. Zen A, Carnevale V, Lesk AM, Micheletti C. Correspondences between low-energy modes in enzymes: dynamics-based alignment of enzymatic functional families. Protein Sci 2008, 17(5):918-929. 10.1110/ps.073390208, 2327282, 18369194.
22. Zen A, de Chiara C, Pastore A, Micheletti C. Using dynamics-based comparisons to predict nucleic acid binding sites in proteins: an application to OB-fold domains. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(15):1876-1883. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp339, 19487258.
23. Fanning AS, Anderson JM. PDZ domains: Fundamental building blocks in the organization of protein complexes at the plasma membrane. Journal of Clinical Investigation 1999, 103(6):767-772. 10.1172/JCI6509, 408156, 10079096.
24. Van Ham M, Hendriks W. PDZ domains - Glue and guide. Molecular Biology Reports 2003, 30(2):69-82. 10.1023/A:1023941703493, 12841577.
25. Harris BZ, Lim WA. Mechanism and role of PDZ domains in signaling complex assembly. Journal of Cell Science 2001, 114(18):3219-3231.
26. Jelen F, Oleksy A, Smietana K, Otlewski J. PDZ domains - Common players in the cell signaling. Acta Biochimica Polonica 2003, 50(4):985-1017.
27. Jemth P, Gianni S. PDZ Domains: Folding and Binding. Biochemistry 2007, 46(30):8701-8708. 10.1021/bi7008618, 17620015.
28. Hung AY, Sheng M. PDZ domains: Structural modules for protein complex assembly. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2002, 277(8):5699-5702. 10.1074/jbc.R100065200, 11741967.
29. Tonikian R, Zhang Y, Sazinsky SL, Currell B, Yeh J-H, Reva B, Held HA, Appleton BA, Evangelista M, Wu Y, et al. A Specificity Map for the PDZ Domain Family. PLoS Biol 2008, 6(9):e239. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060239, 2553845, 18828675.
30. Chen JR, Chang BH, Allen JE, Stiffler MA, MacBeath G. Predicting PDZ domain-peptide interactions from primary sequences. Nature Biotechnology 2008, 26(9):1041-1045. 10.1038/nbt.1489, 2655215, 18711339.
31. Ponting CP. Evidence for PDZ domains in bacteria, yeast, and plants. Protein Science 1997, 6(2):464-468. 2143646, 9041651.
32. De Los Rios P, Cecconi F, Pretre A, Dietler G, Michielin O, Piazza F, Juanico B. Functional Dynamics of PDZ Binding Domains: A Normal-Mode Analysis. 2005, 89(1):14-21. 1366512, 15821164.
33. Law AB, Fuentes EJ, Lee AL. Conservation of side-chain dynamics within a protein family. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131(18):6322-6323. 10.1021/ja809915a, 2678171, 19374353.
34. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. Journal of Molecular Biology 1993, 233(1):123-138. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1489, 8377180.
35. Aung A, Tan K-L. MatAlign: Precise protein structure comparison by matrix alignment. J Bioinf Comp Biol 2006, 4:1197-1216.
36. Beique JC, Andrade R. PSD-95 regulates synaptic transmission and plasticity in rat cerebral cortex. Journal of Physiology 2003, 546(3):859-867. 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.031369, 2342599, 12563010.
37. Holm L, Park J. DaliLite workbench for protein structure comparison. Bioinformatics 2000, 16(6):566-567. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.6.566, 10980157.
38. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 1970, 48(3):443-453. 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4, 5420325.
39. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends in Genetics 2000, 16(6):276-277. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2, 10827456.
40. Liao D-I, Qian J, Chisholm DA, Jordan DB, Diner BA. Crystal structures of the photosystem II D1 C-terminal processing protease. Nat Struc Bio 2000, 7:749-753.
41. Krojer T, Garrido-Franco M, Huber R, Ehrmann M, Clausen T. Crystal structure of DegP (HtrA) reveals a new protease-chaperone machine. Nature 2002, 416(6879):455-459. 10.1038/416455a, 11919638.
42. Wilken C, Kitzing K, Kurzbauer R, Ehrmann M, Clausen T. Crystal Structure of the DegS Stress Sensor: How a PDZ Domain Recognizes Misfolded Protein and Activates a Protease. Cell 2004, 117(4):483-494. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00454-4, 15137941.
43. Lindahl E, Hess B, Spoel D. GROMACS 3.0: A package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 2001, 7:306-317.
44. Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJC. GROMACS: fast, flexible and free. J Comput Chem 2005, 26:1701-1718. 10.1002/jcc.20291, 16211538.
45. Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS potential functions for proteins. Energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc 1988, 110:1657-1666.
46. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 1953, 21:1087-1092.
47. Johnson DS, Aragon CR, McGeoch LA, Schevon C. Optimization by Simulated Annealing: An Experimental Evaluation; Part I, Graph Partitioning. Operations Research 1989, 37(6):865-892.