Patient reported outcome measurement: Learning to walk before we run

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Volumn 103, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 129-132

  Maynard, Alan ^a   Bloor, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 77950654468     PISSN: 01410768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2010.090477     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Lunacy Act 1845 - The Regulation of the care and treatment of lunatics (8 & 9 Vict. c. 100)
2. Nightingale F. Some Notes on Hospitals. 3rd edn. London: Longmans, Green and Co.; 1863
3. Department of Health and Social Security. Priorities in Health and Personal Social Services in England: a consultative document. London: HMSO; 1976
4. Darzi A. High quality care for all: NHS Next Stage Review final report, Cm 7432. London: The Stationery Office; 2008
5. Cutler DM, Huckman RS, Landrum MB. The Role of Information in Medical Markets: An Analysis of Publicly Reported Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery. Cambridge, MA: NBERWorking Paper 10489; 2004
6. See http://heartsurgery.cqc.org.uk
7. See www.sf36.org
8. See www.euroqol.org/
9. Health Survey for England. See http://www.ic.nhs.uk/ statistics-and-data- collections/health-and-lifestylesrelated-surveys/health-survey-for-england
10. Vallance Owen A, Cubbin S,Warren V, Matthews B. Outcome monitoring to facilitate clinical governance; experience from a national programme in the independent sector. J Public Health 2004;26:187-192 (Pubitemid 39030857)
11. Atkinson A. Atkinson Review: Final Report. London: HMSO; 2005
12. Devlin NJ, Parkin D, Browne J. Using the EQ-5D as a performance measurement tool in the NHS. Discussion Paper Series No. 09/03. London: City University, Department of Economics; 2009
13. House of Commons Health Committee. First Report: NHS Next Stage Review. HC53-1. London: The Stationery Office; 2009
14. Browne J, Jamieson L, Lewsey J, et al. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Elective Surgery: Report to the Department of Health. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2007. See http://www. lshtm.ac.uk/hsru/research/PROMs-Report-12-Dec-07.pdf
15. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-B:185-190 (Pubitemid 26096988)
16. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1998;80-B:63-69 (Pubitemid 28048491)
17. Garratt AM, Macdonald LM, Ruta DA, Russell IT, Buckingham JK, Krukowski ZH. Towards measurement of outcome for patients with varicose veins. Qual Health Care 1993,2:5-10